Free Order on Motion to Dismiss - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I Case 3:03-cv-01011-AWT Document 24 Filed 10/14/2003 Page 1 of 1 i
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT N
é
Z I
NICHOLAS CAGGIANIELLO, NEIL : CASE NO. 303CVI 01 I(AWT)
HOWARD and THOMAS FALCO, on : I
behalf of themselves and all other similarly :
situated employees of FSO PrivatAir. Inc. : l
PLAINTIFFS. "r _
vs. ;
FSG PRIVATAIR, INC. and in "their i
individual and official capacities DAVID C. :
I--IURLEY, HUGH I·`. RIEGAN, THOMAS H. :
MILLER and THOMAS I`,. CONNELLY 1
DEI·`I.€NDAN'I`S. II-§I..Y I. EIIIIB j
l
MOTION T() DISIVIISS
Dcl`endants I·`S(i I’I·ix·nt.\ir. Inc l"i}l'l\`LII.`·.iI`N-I. David C`. Hurley. Hugh I'. Regan. Thomas H.
2 Miller and Thomas L. Connelly, by their attorney, move the court pursuant to F.R.C.P. I2 (b) for an i
V1 ' ' .
fj order dismissing; the above·entitled action on the grounds that the court does not have subject I
‘“ I
gg matter jurisdiction over the Fair Labor Standards Act claims asserted by the plaintiifs and that the I
{,2 \ plaintiffs have tailed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The defendant ESG I
§ PrivatAir. Inc. is an air carrier and subject to Title II ofthe Railway Labor Act under 45 U .S.C. §
¤ .
ig IRI. Thcr·et`orc. PSG PrivaLAir is exempt from the Il air Labor Standards Act as an air carrier
8
2 A pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 21 3(b) (3).
r a
5 at s
E E if t
E ft 2* NO ORAL ARGUIVIENT REQUESTED i
if r
rtl E.;
tl 2 E