Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I .- _ IV . '] __ / , . I,] I W.
I _ I Case 3:03-cv-01011-AWT Document 31 Filed 12/24/Lp 3 I|§IigI¢)|(eof—*=1/ I li?}/Y/}
I
55% I I e
UNITED STATES DISTRICT C URT I I J Q
DISTRICT OF CONNECTIC T
I I -- · — i ·- I Y
I I I. ..= - I ~ · I ' * I
, NICHOLAS CAGGIANIELLO, NEIL : _ . p I — I p I
I . HOWARD and THOMAS FALCO, on behalf CA E NO. I):03CVl0l lI(AWT) Q I .` - .· ` ` I
'U . . . ..,,,‘._·,I.·=.·¤
I g of themselves and all other similarly situated : I "
p g employees of FSG Privatair, Inc.
I O I
f, piaimirrs, I
Z : Oct ber 28,I2003
I *‘ I
[ ni vs. :
M I
I I I
lg FSG PRIVATAIR, INC., and in their I
‘; individual and official capacities DAVID C. _ I
#1 HURLEY, HUGH F. REGAN, THOMAS H. j
II MILLER and THOMAS L. CONNELLY ` I
2 I
Q Defendants.
a -`"``````"`"“`”“`_```“`"`"`”``"`“—` I
if PLAINTIFFS’ PROPOSED CASE MANA EMEN PLAN
$
fl, I. CERTIFICATION I
G
§ Pursuant to the Court’s order at oral argument on Oc ober 9, I2003, the
a I I
_ E1 undersigned counsel for the plaintiffs understood the parties were inptructed to jointly file ,
H I
§· their respective positions and proposals on matters concemii g discoI¤ery with the court
U
g pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. l6(b) and 26(f), and L. Civ. R. l (b) andI26(e). Pursuant to
1j I I
I I
g said rules and court order, counsel attempted to schedule tel phonic Iconferences with
& I
Q defense counsel however messages and faxes left with defe e coun el for this purpose I
.¤ I
. Ig went unanswered. With receipt of defendants’ Proposed Ca e Man gernent Plan, dated
U
E October 23, 2003, plaintiff s counsel now hereby submits a ropose case management
·|··’
fi +5 plan which is a variation of the revised draft proposed plann ng mee ing report forwarded
5 Q 0'I I
§ via facsimile to defendants’ counsel on October 24, 2003, a er seveIaI phone messages I
It
lf! O 5 i
u EE Q
ii P; Ii I I
. a E Ja r I
GJ I I
5 2 E I
....2. - -_.L LI-.. I I A L I I