Free Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 86.6 kB
Pages: 3
Date: October 30, 2003
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 694 Words, 4,748 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22946/25.pdf

Download Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Connecticut ( 86.6 kB)


Preview Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Connecticut
N"- `'"' "”"'*`F “‘`‘ “‘;‘_““ '“_‘;*—*·“—W·*— —————·-—;——-—~~—~w—-l·L—--.;.~%M.Y_._. ..I..
Case 3:03-cv-01016-WWE Document 25 Filed 10/30/2003 Page 1 of 3 i
· l
l 1 11=, l
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECT%§t]IErj jg A Q2 Ll 0 l
F _ I
%= ,aa_ eg; i_f:lil3`i`iZ*?’.€Ci i3QL?i JULIE DILLON RIPLEY MILLER, ,1tlQR3’¤bsAelv¤b16 (RNC)(DFM)
Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant, ,
— against- i
MERRILL LYNCH CREDIT CORPORATION, ,
October 29, 2003
Defendant and Counterclaimant.
l
` JOINT MOTION REGARDING PRE-TRIAL ISSUES
In furtherance of the efficient administration of this proceeding, the parties to this l
action collectively bring this Joint Motion Regarding Pre—Trial Issues (the "Joint Motion"). The
parties respectfully request that the Court grant the following relief: (i) that Plaintiff be
permitted to add an affirmative defense; and (ii) that the schedule for expert disclosure be revised y
without impacting the discovery cut—off date.
I
The parties are g seeking to extend the final discovery deadline of January I2,
2004. This is the second motion to amend the dates in the Pre—Tria1 Schedule, and there is good
cause to grant this Joint Motion. First, Plaintiff is seeking to amend its Reply to Defendant’s
counterclaim and in the interest of efficiency, Defendant is not objecting to this amendment. l
Second, Defendant is seeking additional time to complete non-rebuttal expert
reports required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. The reports are currently due on November I0, 2003, and
Defendant foresees that, despite reasonable diligence, additional time will be necessary. Plaintiff l
I
does not object to an extension of the time to exchange non-rebuttal expert reports, provided that

the extension applies to both parties. An adjustment to the pre-trial schedule can be ordered
l
L<5°‘¢(=;r¥?\f-;$¤;L·§•·5:|-;¢5i•—; ${7- T l I ” ` ’ T" '— ('J ¥<‘·l—5 { Lil} ¤éd:}2éJ}L1kJ$é»L1¤i R3-i é?5 3%%* -E’¥·§

xg-<=?¤q=?T-éj=:***f'”?*E*;E“7r·5—-L-T ' " · **-3*;- ¢·<-S-£<-;—:ci=;l;i{:;;g¢;{§5T;?‘~,,g;-r-;;‘ijg;1_;;;; T__;·_i;;;,;_»;_q%;__.a,g.,=,Q;;e.1:·.:·g;;s;;¤; z,;.;;,§H;;,;£g_y,; _ii;;i;y.i.i;.,;;@·.;=,,,,;.;€

UCT_2S—C%%3eI3i00§6v-O1O16—\llIIW§SIDI5olt[lifthent 25 Filed 10/30/2003 Page 2 or 3 P. as/aa
_ I
l
without impacting the discovery cut-off date. Accordingly, the parties seek to amend the pre-
I trial schedule as indicated below. ‘ - _
Afier-reviewing the Joint_1\/lotion, and finding good cause, the Court hereby l
I 2 I. osnaasz — i
(i) Plaintiff is granted leave to amend its Reply to Defendant’s Counterclaim to
I . add the affirmative defense that the mortgage and note were unconscionable;
(ii) The schedule for expert discovery is amended as follows: 1
Non-Rebuttal Expert Reports: November 26, 2003 J
. I Non-Rebuttal Expert Depositions: December I0, 2003
Rebuttal Expert Reports: December 30, 2003 1
_ Rebuttal Expert Depositions: January 12, 2004 `
. Hon. Donna F. Martinez
‘ ‘ United States Magistrate Judge I
Dated: October 28, 2003 g ‘
BEGOS & HORGAN LLP . PAUL, I—IAS'I`1NGS, JANOFSKY & · I N
_` WALKER LLP `
Bytg é Byi
Patrick W. Begos, 19090 Douglas C. Conroy, etl 1555 {
327 Riverside Avenue s Thomas P. Friedman, et24947 _____ _ ____ I
Westport, CT 06880 1055 Washington Boulevard ““
Te1ephone:(203) 226-9990 Stamford, CT 06901-2217 g
Facsirnile:(203) 222-4833 Telephone: (203) 961-7400
Email: [email protected] Facsimile: (203) 359-3031
Counsel for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Email: [email protected]
Defendant [email protected] .
JULIE DILLON RIPLEY MILLER Counsel for Defendant and Counterclaimant
_ MERRILL LYNCH CREDIT g
( conronanon g
s ( R i
1
10x2sx200a TUE 18:23 [TX/RX N0 usa} una

Case 3:03-cv-01016-WWE Document 25 Filed 10/30/2003 Page 3 of 3
‘
I
I
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I
This is to certify that on this 29th day of October, 2003, a copy of the foregoing JOINT
MOTION REGARDING PRE-TRIAL ISSUES was delivered via U.S. first class mailto:
Patrick W. Begos, Esq.
BEGOS & HORGAN, LLP
327 Riverside Avenue
Westport, CT 06880
Thomas P. Friedman I
STM/261974.1
ll4I3.0002l I
I
I
I
I

I
I