Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 166.9 kB
Pages: 4
Date: June 13, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 936 Words, 5,950 Characters
Page Size: 613.44 x 790.92 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22946/209.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 166.9 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-01016-WWE Document 209 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 1 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
BRIDGEPORT
-------— —·—· —---------- -··--· ~——- — --------—— —· ——------ - -------- ···-···- —-------——— ···X
JULIE DILLON RIPLEY MILLER, :
1 Case No. 03-CV-1016 (WWE)
Plaintiff, :
-—- against- June 13, 2007
MERRILL LYNCH CREDIT CORPORATION,
Defendant.
-----—— ··· -—-- - --------————— ·— -----------------———— ·-··-· -·-·------------ ·- ————~— X
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULES ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE
(DOC NOS. 195 AND 207)
WHEREAS, plaintiff served motions in limirze on April 4, 2007 (Doc. No. 195);
WHEREAS, by order dated May 23, 2007 (Doc. No. 203), the Court, sua sponte, adjourned
the trial of this action, from July 9, 2007 to August 13, 2007; the parties have advised the Court that
various attorneys’ and/or witnesses are unavailable on that date, they have requested the trial he
adjourned to a date on or about September 24, 2007, and they have been informed by Judge
Eginton’s clerk that she was marking September 24, 2007 as the new trial date; l
WHEREAS, defendant served motions in /imir/ze on June 5, 2007 (Doc. No. 207), plaintiffs 1
I
opposition to which is due June 26, 2007;
WHEREAS the parties began settlement discussions with Magistrate Judge Fitzsimmons on I
June 6, 2007, which discussions the Magistrate Judge has continued to at least June 14, 2007;
WHEREAS, in order to allow counsel to focus on potential settlement of the action, and due
to the adjournment of the trial, the parties jointly request that the briefing schedule be modified as
follows:
> Plaintiff s reply papers in further support of her motions in Zimine (Doc No. 195) shall be
served on or before June 29, 2007.

Case 3:03-ov—01016-WWE Document 209 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 2 of 4
> Plaintiff’s opposition to defendant’s motions in limirze (Doc. No. 207), shall be served on or
before July 13, 2007;
> Defendant’s reply papers in further support of its motions in limine (Doc. No. 207) shall be
served on or before July 31, 2007.
The parties have previously sought three extensions of the briefing schedule for plaintiff’ s
motions in limirze, all of which motions were granted: Document Nos. 196, 198 and 204; the parties
have not previously sought any extension ofthe briefing schedule for defendant’s motions in I imine.
Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court extend the briefing schedules on
the parties motions in limine pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.
After reviewing the Joint Motion and finding good cause, the Court hereby ORDERS:
_ > Plaintiff s reply papers in further support of her motions in Iimine (Doc No. 195) shall be
served on or before June 29, 2007.
> Plaintif1”s opposition to defendant’s motions in limine (Doc. No. 207), shall be served on or
before July 13, 2007;
> Defendant’s reply papers in further support of its motions in limine (Doc. No. 207) shall be
served on or before July 31, 2007.
Hon. Warren W. Eginton
Senior United States District Judge
KREBSBACH & SNYDER, P.C. BEGOS HORGAN & BROWN LLP
Attorneys for Defendant Attorneys for Plaintiff
5 E 6,4/ {Aga/xr [ ‘i‘i‘`i`
Bary S. G d (phv0165 ) atrick W. e os ct 19090)
55 Broadway, Suite 1600 327 Riverside Avenue
New York, NY 10006 Westport, CT 06880
212-825-9811 203~226-9990
212-825-9828 (fax) 203-222-4833 (fax)
[email protected] [email protected]
2

lur. 12. iegeeesrmrrsv-01 sterrsrrs srttsevvreet 209 Filed 06/14/2007 re?ess r Plaintiffs opposition to defenclarrfs motions in Iimine (Doe. No. 207), shall be served on or
before July 13, 2007;
> De1`er1c1ant’s reply papers in further support of its motions in lirnine (Doo. N0. 207) shall be
served on or before July 31, 2007.
The parties have previously sought three extensions of the briefing schedule 1i`UT])1El,1l1l1Zi`f’S p
motions in limine, all ofwhioli motions were granted: Doeurnent Nos. 196, 198 and 204; the parties
have not previously sought any extension ofthe briefing schedule for c1efenda.nt’s motions in [imma.
Accordingly, the panties respectfully request that the Court extend the briefing schedules on
the parties motions in Zimine pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.
After reviewing the Joint Motion and finding good cause, the Court hereby ORDERS:
> Plaintiffs reply papers in lirrther support of her inotions in limine (Doe No, 195) shell be g
served on or before June 29, 2007. "
> Plaintiffs opposition to def`endant’s motions in [inline (Doe. No. 207), shall be served on or
before July 13, 2007;
> Defiendanfs reply papers in further support of its motions or Iimirre (Doe. No. 207) shell be
served on or before July 3l, 2007.
Hon. Warren W. Eginton
Senior United States District Judge
KREBSBACH & SNYDER, P.C. BEGOS HORGAN Sc BROWN LLP
Attorneys for Defendant Attoryr Plaintiff`
Barry S. Giéld (p1rv01650) lgatrielc W. Begos (et 19090)
55 Broad ay, Suite l600 327 Riverside Avenue
New York, NY 10006 Westport, CT 06380
212-325-9811 203-226-9990
212-825-9828 (fax) 203-·222-4833 (fax)
[email protected] pwb@begosI1o1‘gan.oom
2

Case 3:03-cv—01016-WWE Document 209 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 4 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that a copy ofthe foregoing was mailed via first class mail, postage prepaid,
on June 13, 2007 to:
Barry S. Gold, Esq.
Krebsbach & Snyder, P.C.
55 Broadway, Suite 1600
New York, NY 10006
Jonathan S. Bowman, Esq.
Cohen & Wolf
1115 Broad Street
Bridgeport, CT 06604
Pgtrick W. Begos (ct 9090)
l

l