Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 157.4 kB
Pages: 4
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 848 Words, 5,636 Characters
Page Size: 613.44 x 790.92 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22946/216.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 157.4 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-01016-WWE Document 216 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 1 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
BRIDGEPORT
--—-—— — ·———— ·•········· ----—------------------ -• —-————— -· —-—------------------—— -·-·X
JULIE DILLON RIPLEY MILLER, 2
: Case No. 03-CV-1016 (WWE)
Plaintiff, :
—- against- July 25, 2007
MERRILL LYNCH CREDIT CORPORATION,
Defendant.
------—————~— ·• —-—------------------—---—-— --·· ——~-------------—--- -· -·——— ······X
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULES ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE
(DOC NOS. 195 AND 207) AND PRETRIAL MEMORANDA (DOC NO. 211) ,
WHEREAS, on or about July 20, 2007, after extensive discussions, the parties reached an
agreement in principle to settle this action;
WHEREAS, the parties have begun to prepare and negotiate the documents required to
effectuate the agreement; due to the nature of the prospective settlement, the parties expect that it
may take several weeks to reach a final agreement;
WHEREAS, to allow the parties to devote their efforts to completing the proposed settlement,
the parties jointly request that the Court modify the present1y—existing schedule, as follows: *
> Plaintiff s reply papers in further support of her motions in limirze (Doc No. 195) shall be E
delivered to defendant’s counsel on or before August 17, 2007;
> Plaintiffs opposition to defendant’s motions in limine (Doc. No. 207), shall be delivered to _
defendant’s counsel on or before August 17, 2007; I
> Defendant’s reply papers in further support of its motions in limirze (Doc. No. 207) shall be
delivered to plaintiff s counsel on or before August 24, 2007; and
> Pretrial memoranda shall be submitted on or before August 3 l, 2007.
The parties have previously sought seven extensions of the briefing schedule for plaintiff’s i
motions in Iimine: Document Nos. 196, 198, 204, 207, 209, 212 and 214; the parties have previously

Case 3:03-cv—01016-WWE Document 216 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 2 of 4
sought three extensions ofthe briefing schedule for defendant’s motions in limime: Document Nos.
207, 209 and 214. All of these motions were granted. The parties have not previously sought
extension ofthe schedule for submission of pretrial memoranda.
Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court extend the briefing schedules.
After reviewing the Joint Motion and finding good cause, the Court hereby ORDERS:
* Plaintiffs reply papers in further support of her motions in limine (Doc No. 195) shall be
delivered to defendant’s counsel on or before August 17, 2007;
> Plaintiffs opposition to defendant’s motions in Zimirze (Doc. No. 207), shall be delivered to
defendant’s counsel on or before August 17, 2007;
> Defendant’s reply papers in further support of its motions in liminc (Doc. No. 207) shall be
delivered to plaintiff’ s counsel on or before August 24, 2007; and
> Pretrial memoranda shall be submitted on or before August 31, 2007.
I-Ion. Warren W. Eginton
Senior United States District Judge
KREBSBACH & SNYDER, P.C. BEGOS HORGAN & BROWN LLP
Attorneys for Defendant Attorneys for Plaintiff
5 4% S Qg gg./g .
B rry S. G d (phv01650) P trick W. Begos ct 19090) I
55 Broadway, Suite 1600 327 Riverside Avenue '
New York, NY 10006 Westport, CT 06880
212-825-98ll 203-226-9990
[email protected] [email protected]
2

Case 3:03-cv—01016-WWE Document 216 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 3 of 4 _
sought three extensions ofthe briefmg schedule for defendant’s motions in limine: Document Nos.
207, 209 and 214. All of these motions were granted. The parties have not previously sought
extension ofthe schedule for submission of pretrial memoranda.
Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court extend the briefing schedules.
After reviewing the Joint Motion and finding good cause, the Court hereby ORDERS:
> Plaintiff" s reply papers in further support of her motions in limine (Doc No. 195) shall be
delivered to defendant’s counsel on or before August 17, 2007;
> Plaintiff s opposition to defendar1t’s motions in Iimfne (Doc. No. 207), shall be delivered to
defendant’s counsel on or before August 17, 2007; E
> Defendant’s reply papers in further support of its motions in limine (Doc. No. 207) shall be E
delivered to plaintiff s cotmsel on or before August 24, 2007; and ·
> Pretrial memoranda shall be submitted on or before August 31, 2007.
Hon. Warren W. E ginton .
. Senior United States District Judge {
KREBSBACH & SNYDER, P.C. BEGOS HORGAN & BROWN LLP
Attorneys for Defendant Attorney or Plai if ·
J
arry S. ol (phv01650) P trick W. Begos (ct 19090)
55 Broad ay, Suite 1600 327 Riverside Avenue
New York, NY 10006 Westport, CT 06880
212—825—98ll 203-226-9990
[email protected] [email protected] _
. l
l

Case 3:03-cv—01016-WWE Document 216 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 4 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that a copy ofthe foregoing was mailed via first class mail, postage prepaid,
on July 25, 2007 to:
Barry S. Gold, Esq.
Krebsbach & Snyder, P.C.
55 Broadway, Suite 1600
New York, NY 10006
Jonathan S. Bowman, Esq.
Cohen & Wolf
1115 Broad Street
Bridgeport, CT 06604
,%_ %/K 1
atrick W. Begos (ct19090) 5
l