Free Order on Motion for Sanctions - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 59.3 kB
Pages: 1
Date: May 17, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 466 Words, 2,777 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22985/39.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Sanctions - District Court of Connecticut ( 59.3 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Sanctions - District Court of Connecticut
.)[>r"i..iJ ....._....j_ . ,J_ ___, __ H-.-_“ -i-——_
ase 3:03-cv-O10?§iA_vC Document 39 Filed 05/14/2004 Pggeyg mIm$6m
. ·. . `__, ,i (W)
I <5\ UNTIED ESTATES DISTRICT COURT I
I°’ DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
:> 1
$.1 GJ
Ii ,§ DOLORES FONSECA. ET AL Q D|V.NO. 3:03 CV1055 (AVC)
to ui ,
r: .o
rc Plaintiff ; I
2 ii I
LF cg JASON ALTERIO, ET AL :
Q E Defendants I April ‘I, 2004 ;:;—;I:';
in _ __" " GTQYQGQ
E B Q gg; DEFENDANT, JASON ALTER|OS' MOTION FOR S§5ISI_§TIQI§|S
is H se is it
§ E mj Q_ giigjrsuant to Rule 37(b)(2) and 37 (d) of the Federal Rule§c£CivL_r·Ij°roce$re,
M .:r -__ cv: · gt ··
I, S if g:Bef t Jason Alterio moves for sanctions against the Plaintiffsgor f@ing to attend
‘·" E ~—£=: . . . . .
g ig §dep6fs_}1t_tons and canceling depositions in a non-timely manner. The depositions of
I .°’ ···~· “?"““
E .§ 6 DelFres Fonseca and Ralph Fonseca were scheduled at the City Attorney‘s office in I
*0 · .
ic; 5 2 Bridgeport for December 29, 2003 at 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. respectively by the I
rg Q; E if Defendants, Jorge Larrequi and City of Bridgeport, through counsel. Counsel for the N
ra 0 I 0
gl XI Q PEI Defendant, Jason Alterio drove from New Jersey to attend these depositions.
.:.3 - ·,>
é 2 é 8 Approximately, ten minutes before the deposition was to commence, counsel for the
o :>-I .
Q3 § .¤ > Plaintiffs telephoned the City Attorney‘s Office and indicated that neither he nor his
. ·o
GJ w cu
gg 1 clients would be attending the deposition. PIaintiff’s counsel did not file any motions I
.9}..; I
CD an
Q ·° with the court regarding the depositions. The Plaintiffs have repeatedly canceled I
0 » .
U1 O ;Ir I
5, Q » depositions on extremely short notice even after the incident described in this motion. I
ui o 3 *
.o E
GJ -I-J `
Lt? O'}
mi o ·
.£‘.1 U ‘
E··|* tg 1
• qi .
· .. F2 rx; Si I
iltiil-I ·-i Q .
·-wr-r DS
ru cv 0 I
Q C: g O Cmvtoa, Fr.oMAN, Grzoss, SAcr2AMoNa&DALv, P.C.— Juars 43415 I
E` IU *1 U1 378 sosrora POST Roxio-P.o.oRAwER9B6-omues,cr 06477-0965 I
TELEPHONE (203)795-1211 - Fax (i!03)795·1215 ~ r-rAMoar~i (2U3)2BB—2132 I
\•V\NW.CBnLOffIOFFl8Y1.C0l1'1 \
é Q ml r _r r_r-r-r - V - V - V I 7 - V 2 - V V T in tx ri`r:§r--;T::é_;it}-_ if 5--- {:7;
_; ‘ i *7* ·* is 4-.7 ij;i;‘ij??j’sf#e$€€s=s
_Q_Qf`;°i ''‘’ ` ‘ ‘ TT K *7 V TEE asses
__,_,_,_ I 'I”I'I I `i`I `f`'i i `iii -`’‘ ’
. [ I