Free Motion for Protective Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 65.1 kB
Pages: 3
Date: March 23, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 459 Words, 2,963 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22985/35.pdf

Download Motion for Protective Order - District Court of Connecticut ( 65.1 kB)


Preview Motion for Protective Order - District Court of Connecticut
I" I
i · Case 3:03-cv-0105 -AVC Document 35 Filed O3/2§/2004 Page 1 of3 E
I C) CD I I
I I \
i ·D *
E .; L,
i
ZGUU MAH? · . -
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT `“3 A !U` S? '
U X}-Yi. K.?ff;§i;"“§f`·*" W —~ I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I
OLORES EONSECA, RAFAEL : DOCKET NO. I
ONSECA and MELANIE I
HONSECA, a minor, ppa, ; 03—CV—1055 (AVC)
Plaintiffs, : {
I
SON ALTERIO, a Bridgeport police : Q
officer, in his individual capacity; :
RGE LARREGUI, a Bridgeport police : E
officer, in his individual capacity; l
a d the CITY OF BRIDGEPORT, a :
nicipal corporation,
Defendants. 5
: MARCH 22, 2004
MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER N
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26, the plaintiff Dmlores Fonseca,
I
e al, respectfully requests this court enter an Order sustaining i
h's objection to Notice of Deposition dated March 16, 2004 for 5
M lanie Fonseca. In support thereof, plaintiffs represent: `
1. A notice of deposition dated March 16, 2004 was
r ceived by counsel for the plaintiffs on March 18, 2004
p rporting to notice the deposition of Melanie Fonseca for March
2 , 2004 at 2:00 p.m.. This notice is not timely under the
f deral rules since it is less than one week before the
d position.
3
. 4;;-——— ———.
: .
i— 5-_»__ qi-_' A-


-ll._.*_ l__ ( _,


7 7 "_”__”'“"““““7'““"”'"“““"“”"“_”'“*"`“"`
\
I ‘ Case 3:03-cv-01055-AVC Document 35 Filed O3/23/2004 Page2of3
7 w 7
2. The plaintiff, Melanie Fonseca, is a seven year old
that is emotionally and fragile after seeing her mother beaten in
his traumatic incident. i
3. Plaintiffs offered defendants’ counsel an agreement in
hich they may take the deposition of plaintiff Melanie Fonseca ¤
ik a controlled environment, such as a psychiatrist office. X
Dffendants have not responded to plaintiffs offer which was sent
today via facsimile.
l
} Wherefore, the plaintiffs respectfully request that this ,
c urt enter an order directing that the defendant not take the
d position of Melanie Fonseca except under controlled conditions. I
THE PLAINTIFFS 5
DOLOBES FONSECA, ET AL
WILLIAM B. BARNES, ESQ.
(CTOO268) `
Rosenstein & Barnes
llOO Kings Hwy. East,
Fairfield, CT 06825
(203) 367-7922
[ 2
7 7 1
· . '—"A`"_‘_"`"_'_"_'_V

F `A-LF". ' I —;t"”-_-`
( , Case 3:03-cv-01055-AVC Document 35 Filed 03/23/2004 Page30f3
CERTIFICATION }
A copy of the foregoing was mailed first class mail, postage ’
p epaid, on March 22, 2004 to:
B rbara Brazzel—Massaro, Esq. Diane Benevides, Esq.
A sociate City Attorney Cantor, Floman, Gorss, Kelly, F
O fice of the City Attorney Amendola & Sacramone
B idgeport City Hall Annex 378 Boston Post Road _
999 Broad St. Orange CT 06477
B ldgepoxt, CT 06604 \
WILLIAM B. BARNES, BBQ.
l
K a l
l
1
1
5