Free Order on Motion for Reconsideration - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

§__ ase 3:03-cv-01055-AVC Document 100 Filed 10/31 /2006 _ Page 1 of 1 ‘
Case 3r03—cv-01055~AVC Document 95 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 1 of 6
l * K Z, . .
l' , .
_ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ·
, DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT V Y
DOLORES FONSECA, RAFAEL S : NO.: 3:03-cv-01055 (AVC)
FONSECA and MELANIE :
FONSECA, minor, ppa _ S : _ =
Plaintms, 1 :
vs. ' : A
JASON ALTERIO, JORGE LARREGUI, A
_ AND CITY OF BRIDGEPORT, :
Defendants. ‘ : AUGUST 15, 2006 V
. · g MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
’ _ _ Defendant, Jason Alterio, respectfully requests the Court to reconsider its ruling dated July 28,
2006, denying Defendant Jason Alterio’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment conceming plaintiffs
false arrest claim. In support of this motion, the defendant first asks the Court to apply its determination
that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a deprivation of liberty to the false arrest claim. Second,
defendant Alterio requests that the Court consider developing case law supporting the Defendant’s claim
I andthe Second Circuit Court of Appeals opinion, that the issuance of a summons without significant
` restrictions does not implicate a Fourth Amendment violation. Finally, the Defendant asks the Court to
f consider undisputed facts which may have been overlooked, but which clearly indicate that the plaintiff
A did not suffer a deprivation of liberty. A totality of the above factors should be applied in the Court’s
consideration as to whether or not the mere issuance of a summons is sufficient to support plaintiff s
ii Fourth Amendment claim. 2
S 3:O3CVO1055 (AVC) October 2005 Because . "‘>
; · I · “ ,— * · _ the »WlCgE1$i1'1· motion f
. 1;;coge1ole1ra‘»;1or1 was not f1led and served w1th;i.n ten (10) days ref the filing gf
,€ €CJ.S101'1. . . from wh1ch sqeh relief j_,g Sought H D Cgnh C· " °
the mot;1on is DENIED as untimely. - I . fr, I R' 7 (C) ’
so oRDERED. p ~` < y p _~i , ppgp___p
.. ll A it . nn _, I . 1#’ii€§
p 1 Al U ii i r