Free Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

|l
E ' Case 3:03-cv-OO@'j-DJS Document 29-4 Fi|e%18/31/2003 Page 1 of 3 `
I UNITED STATES Drsrmcr counT F l E. E D
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT · 2

; ROBERT KALMAN, ; PRISQNER a
? Plaintiff US Dlfililiitti fitlléjill
V _ . . . NBli"'J£¥“~ *0;* i`
· . Civil Action 0. 3: 03cv B7 i
(DJS) (TPS) 3
ROBERT BERGER, et al., : . \
’ Defendants, October 29, 2003 g
STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS
Pursuant to Rule 9(c) 1 of this court’s Local Rules of Civil Procedure, i
I !
; the plaintiff Robert Kalman, submits the following list of undisputed facts
I that entitle him to summary judgement on his claim of denial of due process N
- _ of law.
l l. On January 10, 2003 defendants Robert Berger, John Ryan, Janet
Williams, Silvia Cancela and Susan Blair, held a hearingpursuant to the
. provisions of Connecticut General Statutes, Section l7a—583. ,
2. On February 21, 2003 defendants Robert Berger, John Ryan, Janet
l
Q Williams, Silvia Cancela and Susan Blair, issued a memorandum of decision
= finding that plaintiff "Robert Kalman is so violent that he requires
confinement within a maximunnsecurity setting"
I 3. The defendant Robert Berger, John Ryan, Janet Williams, Silvia Cancela
l and Susan Blair stated in the Memorandum of decision that "Further the
l 1


"
i E Case 3:03-cv-O@1-DJS Document 29-4 Filegiy/31/2003 Page 2 of 3 N
N
“ Board orders that the confinement of Robert Kalman be under maximum- N
security conditions? ,
4. Pursuant to Connecticut General Statues, Section 17a-599, defendant
Robert Berger, John Ryan, Janet Williams, Silvia Cancela and Susan Blair N
ordered the plaintiff confined to the Whiting Forensic Institute. _ N
; 5. The plaintiff is presently confined under the most restrictive setting at the N
Institute under conditions of maximum—security. N
October 29, 2003 N
. Respectfully submitted, -
Robert Kalman
Whiting Forensic Institute
P. O. Box 70 O’Brien Drive
Middletown, CT 06457-0070
a
t
i N
E I
{
f 2 N

l _ I _ _
A - Case 3:03—cv-0@ -DJS Document 29-4 Filed 19/31/2003 Page 3 of 3 {
l _ I _ E
N CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that a copy of the forgoing Statement of Undis uted l
I Facts, was mailed in accordance with Rule 5 (b) of the Federal Rules of I s
Q Civil Procedure on this 29th, day of October 2003 to: y
Richard J. Lynch » E
Assistant Attorney General
E 55 Elm Street, P. O. Box 120 X
$ Hartford, CT 06141 — 0120
Robert Kalman, Pro se,
l