Free Status Report - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I T I
Case 3:03-cv-OO6E%CFD Document 20 Filed O2/@2004 Page 1 of 4 I
. . I
I I ‘a:a I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ` `U‘D ' I I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT .,, W W ,_ _ I
(HARTFORD) {III MII M (I I-T9 Ii; M3 ;
= ¥.#; iI?%§.iI-F CUIIIII"
J O EL M. ELLIS, : CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3 :03iC0`if I
PLAINTIFF, :
Anrm P. oorn, I
· ND BUTLER, NORRIS & GOLD : I
DEFENDANTS : FEBRUARY 9, 2004 I
RESPONSE BY PARTIES TO ORDER RE: STATUS
The parties are filing their Joint Status Report setting forth the infomation described
» - low with the Clerk of the Court in Hartford, and if there is a disagreement, the different
sponses are set forth following the request.
A. Nature of the Case
l. Briefly describe the nature of this matter, the parties,
the relief requested, and any relationship this case
may have to other pending actions.
RESPONSE: Plaintiff has brought an age discrimination
case arising from the termination of his
employment with the defendants
2. Are there any motions pending? If so, list them.
RESPONSE: Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order
dated January 26, 2004. Plaintiff plans on
filing a response as well as a Motion to '
Compel.
B ·J/32036/4/66524Svl
0 f09:'04-l·lRT/
I
I
I
I

Case 3:03-cv-OO6€%CFD Document 20 Filed O2/$2004 Page 2 of 4 [
B. Discovery
l, Is discovery completed?
RESPONSE: No. l
If not, how much additional time is requested?
RESPONSE: Three to six months.
Will there be a request for modification of the Q
Scheduling Order?
Response; vas.

What will be the request?
RESPONSE: An extension of deadlines between three to
six months. l
C. Settlement
l. When was the last settlement conference and who
conducted it?
RESPONSE: None, a tentatively scheduled conference
with Judge Smith was subject to cancellation
due to scheduling conference and counsel has
not proposed new dates as of today.
2. Are there any outstanding reports due any party or
the person conducting the settlement conference?
RESPONSE: No .
3. Do the parties believe a settlement conference would
be beneficial at this time? I
RESPONSE: The parties believe a settlement conference
may be beneficial.
2 l
B J/32036/4/665248vl
0 109/omnrr R

Case 3:03-cv-OOGSQSCFD Document 20 Filed O2/@2004 Page 3 of 4
i
D. Trial Pre aration
l. When will the case be ready for trial?
RESPONSE: Upon completion of discovery with in six g
months . ` E
2. What additional preparation, other than previously
discussed, is required?
RESPONSE: Deposition of plaintiff and the four
defendants. There may be other others
required who work at the defendant law firm.
3. Are there additional pleadings to be filed?
RESPONSE: No.
If no, when is it due?
RESPONSE: N/A.
4. Has a joint trial memorandum been tiled?
RESPONSE: No.
If not, when is it due?
RESPONSE: Unknown.
PLAINTIFF,
By: g 2
Eliot B. er ten (ct0 213)
Gersten & Clifford
214 Main Street
Hartford, CT 06106
Tel: 860-527-7044 I
Fax: 860-527-4968 I
His Attorney E
3
EJ/32036/4/665248vl
0 rowoenarx

l
Case 3:03-cv-OO6@CFD Document 20 Filed O2/@004 Page 4 of 4
l
DEFENDANTS, I
By: / i
Bern d E. Jac , Esq.
Pepe Hazard LLP
Goodwin Square J
225 Asylum Street l
Hartford, CT 06103-4302
Tel: 860-241-2662
Fax: 860-522-2796
Their Attorney
» l
4 l
B J/32036/4/66524Svl a
u /09/04-HRT.'