Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I _. . . // Case 3:03-cv-00669-CFD Document 14 Filed 10/28/2003 Page 1 of1 _
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT .. . I __
JOEL M. ELLIS Z CIVIL ACTIONINO.- __ I ._ _
I ` Plaintiff, 3 ' " /*; ` " ·
I ‘ I 3:O3CVO669 (CFD)?/I
I v. I * a.._ . . ·
I MARTIN P. GOLD I
I and BUTLER, NORRIS & COLD : I
I Defendants : October 6, 2003 I
,....,..LaL.,.M..m.A... .I,I. .--.,.. I
PLAINTlFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWERS AND I
OBJECTIONS TO THE DEFENDANT’S FIRST SET OF INTERIQGATORIES I
&hLD_I3§mQ@I§..EQ.B..E.B.Q.l2U.QIt.QN I
qi I __: The plaintiff in the above matter, Joel M. Ellis, hereby files this motion for
C.) 1 ; I
I··-· t
IU.; Qfsextension of time of 21 days or until October 29, 2003 to file his answers and
gw Igg’$objections to the defendants first set of interrogatories and requests for I
Ii,. W *=·n* I
`ilproduction. The grounds for the motion are that the requests for production are
{$35 I ' I
{tit extensive and the plaintiff needs more time to search his records to respond.
3 §This is the plaintiff’s first motion for extension ot time regarding these maLters.
M
G U _ The plaintiff‘s counsel ahs discussed this motion for extension of time with I
the defendants counsel, Bernard E. Jacques, and he has indicated he does not
object to the extension of time.
I
VVHEREFORE, the Court should grant the motion. I
ORAL ARGUNIENT NOT REQUESTED
I
‘*"’*W
*·’·"s·