Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

¤- ———-—-T»
Case 3:03-cv-00674-WWE Document 27 Filed 1 1/1/9/2004 Page 1 of 1 I
‘ 1 1 O Q) 1
QL? UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
UM.;
_3_ _J_ RICHARD SCHIRILLO, AUGUSTO CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:O3C\/674(WWE)
~._·ij2__ __9__ CORRELA, RANDOLPH BOND, and
__Pj¤__ _!_;_ RONALD BRENTON
Y-I =‘ Plaintiffs,
if gg 1 v .
( __i. WA i
z ir . . - I U
g, Ii OF STRATFORD, and in their j 55;; -.1;
I I '. 3, in L-Cvidual and official capacities EILEEN i '; `-_' _ g -5 I ` `
;;. ` g° M HY, MICHAEL FEENEY, DORINDA _ IQ-E UA ;
I ’ B Q LFR, I MARK BARNHART, JACK _ "U -
O : ' ESSOR, MICHAEL SINGH, and . _. Ii rg? I
gig pq ,, 1 S _ ; ‘ 1RA gZAL]K 2 - 1 E »- I
-_wj J: g .. lg-I Defendants. November l2, 004 or I
§ “````""‘`‘```‘‘‘```‘`‘”``‘ ` .
*1 1 1
E. ·"‘` I *§ OPTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME REGARDING FILING MEMORANDUM IN
* I . 7i.__ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT -
- ""'*` - -»m¤¤£ Pursuant to D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 7(b), the Plaintiffs, Richard Schiiillo, Augusto Correia, and
Randolph Bond, respectfully request that the court grant an extension of time to tile a Memorandum in I
Opposition to Defendants', Town of,Stratford, Eileen Murphy, Michael Feeney, Dorinda Borer, Mark
Barnhart, and Jack Oberneser, Motion for Summary Judgement from on or about October 21, 2004 to
December 3l, 2004.
Counsel for all parties have been contacted regarding their consent to this motion. Attorney Richard
Buturla, who represents the moving parties on the motion, consents to this motion. Attorney Arthur Laske,
III, who represents Defendants Michael Singh and Sandra Zalik, also consents to this motion.
I
This extension is requested for good cause in that counsel for the undersigned Plaintiffs have been ¤
working diligently on Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgement but have been I
1 I
..,_. ““"‘“""""""""”""_””"_|