Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

.---._,_..,,.,.- _..._ _ .-_.......-....._..._....._......_;.......M......_ ___ ____ i
. l Case 3:03-cv-00712-\§\/WE Document 58 Filed 06/17/2004 Page 1 of 1
@0 , 1 ‘_ r 1
UN]1TED STATES DISTRICT COURT l
msrmcr OF coNNEcT1cUT ZUUM JUN I5 D it 0-,
COUNT
GERTRUDE BAYONNE, : 11.·~ . wm; :~*%JR"1Z C OR':`1 1
Plaintiff,
: CIVIL ACTION NO.
v. : 303 CV 0712 (WWE)
PITNEY BOWES, INC., THE PITNEY
BOWES, INC. LONG TERM :
Q I1 DISABILITY PLAN, THE PI'I`NEY :
g; BOWES, INC. LONG TERM :
_ Q DISABILITY PLAN : _
, Z 5 ADMINISTRATOR AND THE PITNEY :
§_% ¤ 8 Bowes, 1Nc. DISABILITY ;
Q gg DEPARTMENT, :
1 g I E .. = 1
ck g Defendants. : JUNE 14, 2004 1
\
1 I ¤ z W » 1
:2 E N 1, 1
*" ‘€ E § @ Q 1
E e { gg ENDANTS’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TI ME 1
(_ gg MJ FOR FILING OF DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS 1
\ / ""' -*5 22*-J 1
LL Pursuant Qgule 6 of the FederalRules of Civil Procedure, and Rule 7(b)(1) of the Local
§
Rules of Civil Prgcedure, the Defendants in the above-captioned matter respectfully request the 1
Court extend the deadline for tiling dispositive motions until October 15, 2004. On May 6, 1
2004, this Court granted plaintiffs motion to extend the June 1, 2004, discovery deadline in this 1
1
case to September 1, 2004. Previously, the Court had set a June 1, 2004, discovery completion
deadline and August 2, 2004, for the tiling of dispositive motions. Plaintiff had not requested 1
an extension of the previous dispositive motion deadline, and the Court therefore did not address
the dispositive motion deadline in its May 6 ruling.
1
1