Free Memorandum in Support of Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

. .77.7.7 I. . . . ...... —·-·•·»-·J»·-•-1-»· -·••···•-•-··¤·· `111 i 1
Case 3:03-cv-00712-1/VWE Document 51 Filed O6103$2004 Page 1 of 3
1 - ,a.a 1 .. , 1 1
• 1
I. 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E 1
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT 1
1 1
GERTRUDE BAYONNE, :
Plaintiff,
: CIVIL ACTION NO. 1 1
v. : 303 CV 0712 (WWE) 1 ‘
PITNEY BOWES, INC., THE PITNEY -1 1
BOWES, INC. LONG TERM : 1
DISABILITY PLAN, THE PITNEY : 11111;;; gg 1 1
Bowes, 1Nc. Lowe TERM ; ;11;;¤> %
1 DISABILITY PLAN ; 153 gi; "TI 1 1
ADMINISTRATOR AND THE PITNEY : gf; N F
BOWES, INC. DISABILITY : §f§1Q*3` °° 1
DEPARTMENT, : Sa cs: U EI I
- 5%** E2 ”*‘ 1
' * Sra · QJ 1
Defendants. : MAY 28, 2004 ~-.4 1__;_,· 1 1
w¤ 1
NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING
Please take notice that the Defendants have manually tiled the following document:
l. Defendants? Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment;
2. Def`e1rdants’ Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff s Motion for Partial 1
Summary Judgment and in Support of Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment;
3. Defendants’ Local Rule 56(a)(l) Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of 1
Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment;
4. Local Rule 56(a)(2) Statement in Response to Plaintiffs Statement in Support of Motion
for Partial Summary Judgment on Her ERISA Section 502(a)(l)(B) and (a)(3) Claims;
5. Defendants’ Objections to Evidence Submitted in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for
Partial Summary Judgment; 1
6. Defendants’ Appendix of Exhibits in Support of its Cross—Motion for Partial Summary 1
Judgment ‘ 1 1
These documents have not been filed electronically because the electronic file size of the 1 1
document exceeds 1.5 megabytes. This document has been manually served on all parties.
1
r I 1 i _
4117 41 in f1=?{ —_z11r1i; T- i _ rr _- or I- Ir I- Ir i` Q'
ding_1i)q11__1iTi;%;111_¥1$1 _ I " is " is is ·;· .i ;-

.. = .11
1 Case 3:03-cv-OO71€V\1WE Document 51 Filed 06/QSEOO4 Page 2 of 3 1
1 DEFENDANTS
1
1
Theodore J. Tucci (ct05249)
[email protected]
Erin 0’Brien Choquette (ct18585)
I [email protected]
Robinson & Cole LLP 1
280 Trumbull Street 1 1
Hanford, CT 06103 1 .
Tel. No.: (860) 275-8210 1 1 1
Fax No.: (860) 275-8299 1 1 1
Nicole A. Diller (ct25573) 1 ,
[email protected] 1
Sandra R. McCand1ess (ct16494) 1
[email protected] 1 1
Joanne M. Krakora (ct25574) g
[email protected] 1 1
Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP 1
ess Market sneer, 6*** Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105 ‘
Tel. No.: (415) 882-5000 1 1
Fax No.: (415) 543-5472 1
1 1
Attorneys for Defendants 1 1
1 1 1
1 `
11 1
1E
11
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1 1
1 1
1 1
1. 1
1.
' 1 I
1
1 1 1
.. 2 - 1 1 1
1 1
1 1 1
....t..t "'j"*""' ""*

‘ `i_1
I Case 3:03-cv-OO712T\NWE Document 51 Filed 06/O<32’%OO4 Page 3 of 3 l I
• \`_-_/ __‘/
l l
I CERTIFICATE OF smkvrca l
I This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing pleadings were mailed via first class mail,
I I
I postage prepaid, to counsel for Plaintiff addressed as follows: I
Mark P. Carey
Carey & Associates, P.C. I
I 71 Old Post Road South, Suite One
Southport, CT 06890 I I
l l I
this 28th day of May 2004. I
Erin O’Brien Choquette I

I I
I I
ll i T
ll I
l
li
I I
li I
I! I .
ll
ll
l .
l I
ll
ll
lg I
Ia
,|
I!
l i
l. I
l
I l
I
l I
.
l
- 3 .. I
-;... "’”"'”