Free Memorandum in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

. .77.7.7 I. . . . ...... —·-·•·»-·J»·-•-1-»· -·••···•-•-··¤·· il`. 0 I
Case 3:03-cv-00702%/VWE Document 55 Filed O5028$2004 Page 1 of 3
. - ,a.a 0 .. , 0 0
• 0
I. 0
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 0 0
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT 0
0 0
GERTRUDE BAYONNE, :
Plaintiff,
: CIVIL ACTION NO. 0 |
v. : 303 CV 0712 (WWE) 0 0
PITNEY BOWES, INC., THE PITNEY -0 0
BOWES, INC. LONG TERM : 0
DISABILITY PLAN, THE PITNEY : ,,,0;;; gg 0 0
Bowes, 1Nc. Lowe TERM ; ;,0;;¤> %
0 DISABILITY PLAN ; 053 gi; "TI 0 0
ADMINISTRATOR AND THE PITNEY : gf; N F
BOWES, INC. DISABILITY : §f§0Q*3` °° 0
DEPARTMENT, : Sa cs: U EI I
- 5%** E2 ”*‘ 0
' * Sra · QJ 0
Defendants. : MAY 28, 2004 ~-.4 ,__;_,· 0 0
w¤ 0
NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING
Please take notice that the Defendants have manually tiled the following document:
l. Defendants? Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment;
2. Def`e1rdants’ Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff s Motion for Partial 0
Summary Judgment and in Support of Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment;
3. Defendants’ Local Rule 56(a)(l) Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of 0
Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment;
4. Local Rule 56(a)(2) Statement in Response to Plaintiffs Statement in Support of Motion
for Partial Summary Judgment on Her ERISA Section 502(a)(l)(B) and (a)(3) Claims;
5. Defendants’ Objections to Evidence Submitted in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for
Partial Summary Judgment; 0
6. Defendants’ Appendix of Exhibits in Support of its Cross—Motion for Partial Summary 0
Judgment ‘ 0 0
These documents have not been filed electronically because the electronic file size of the 0 0
document exceeds 1.5 megabytes. This document has been manually served on all parties.
0
r I , 0 _
4717 4* in fi=?{ —_zi1r1i; T- i _ rr _- or I- Ir I- Ir 0I` Q'
if-- 4, {Fay--ari 2%;- gwp $4 _ I " is " is is ·;· .i ;-

.. = .1Ll
I Case 3:03-cv-OO71€V\lWE Document 55 Filed O5/@@004 Page 2 of 3 i
1 DEFENDANTS
1
{
Theodore J. Tucci (ct05249)
[email protected]
Erin 0’Brien Choquette (ct18585)
I [email protected]
Robinson & Cole LLP 1
280 Trumbull Street 1 l
Hanford, CT 06103 1 .
Tel. No.: (860) 275-8210 1 l l
Fax No.: (860) 275-8299 1 R l
Nicole A. Diller (ct25573) 1 ,
[email protected] 1
Sandra R. McCand1ess (ct16494) 1
[email protected] l \
Joanne M. Krakora (ct25574) g
[email protected] 1 l
Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP 1
ess Market sneer, 6*** Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105 ‘
Tel. No.: (415) 882-5000 1 \
Fax No.: (415) 543-5472 A
1 1
Attorneys for Defendants l R
1 l 1
1 `
1 }
il
li
l 1
1 1
1 1
1 1 I
l 1
1 1
1. l
1.
' l I
1
1 1 [
.. 2 - 1 1
1 1
1 1 a
....t..t "'j"*""' ""*

‘ `i_1
I Case 3:03-cv-OO712T\NWE Document 55 Filed 05/2€2’%OO4 Page30f3 l I
• \`_-_/ __‘/
l l
I CERTIFICATE OF smkvrca l
I This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing pleadings were mailed via first class mail,
I I
I postage prepaid, to counsel for Plaintiff addressed as follows: I
Mark P. Carey
Carey & Associates, P.C. I
I 71 Old Post Road South, Suite One
Southport, CT 06890 I I
l l I
this 28th day of May 2004. I
Erin O’Brien Choquette I

I I
I I
ll i T
ll I
l
li
I I
li I
I! I .
ll
ll
l .
l I
ll
ll
lg I
Ia
,|
I!
l i
l. I
l
t l
I
l I
.
l
- 3 .. I
-;... "’”"'”