Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

la 2:91 -cv—001 80-RNC Document 488 Filed 11/29/2004 Page 1 of 1

F ILED I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ZIIUII NUV 22 P I: 59
?.Â¥.$._ DISITRICT COURT .
IIN? IF {TC if
P.J., et al., : CIVIL NO. J
Plaintiffs, ·: 291C\/001 80 (RNC) I, /(/I
R V. Z
STATE OF CONNECTICUT, et al.
Defendants. : NOVEMBER 19, 2004
It MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
The plaintiffs move for a ten day enlargement of the time t0 file a Reply to the
defendants’ Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Further Attorneys’ Fees
and Costs. In support of this Motion the plaintiffs represent the following:
l. The pIaintiffs’ Motion for Attomeys’ Fees and Costs was filed on October 4,
2004. [Doc. ## 482, 483.]
2 2. Defendants’ Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and
\E Costs was filed on November 17, 2004 [Doc. #485].
eg 3. Under Local Rule 7(d) plaintiffs’ Reply brief is due on December l, 2004.
2 4. Plaintiffs are unable to file their Reply by December I, 2004 due to plaintiffs’
I-··
Q •T$Qoun§§"s vacation during the week beginning November 22, 2004 and briefs that are due in
65 <=> Q5
KH tiikitxhington Board of Education, N0. 3:02CV252 (SRU) during that same period of
"= gh I
.. e. e-·· #1:: I
3; 5
.\ mm é {,..2
"" Ec; Yi} , -
r‘ · I
*-.____ '
TZ; .
-;. ee; A; gg Q. Q C, - .. - - - __ to __ to lfnfnfl I A I I if I- if I-
F;. aq -; ag Q, Y-_ 2;,, - .. tt __ to __ to __ to __ lflfnflfn . I n I- T I- if--