UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUTZUUU SEP — ‘| A H; 3 8
M2;. %§,.F1*?i`i .
P.J., etal., : CIVIL NO. i A I ` y
Plaintiffs, : 291 CVOOI 80 (RNC) J i
v_ _ ; CMA)
STATE OF CONNECTICUT, etal. C
Defendants. : SEPTEMBER 3, 2004
MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME l
. The plaintiffs move for a two day enlargement of the time within which their
i comments to the Expert Advisory Panel on the Third Annual Report of the Connecticrrt p
ibepartment ar Education are due. In support of this Motion the plaintiffs representethatgdue
, to the holiday weekend and three days—·of‘hearings plaintiffs’ counsel must unexpectedly i
rc · cz
o - - .
» U2 attend on September 3'°, 7th and Sth, it will not be possible to complete plaintiffs’ comments
·cs :> I
B" S to the Third Annual Report by September 8, 2004. _
o ci I y
(D E1 Opposing counsel, Attorney Urban, has been contacted and indicates he takes no
E 5 position on this request. Plaintiffs represent that it is their understanding that this two day, ,
cz -
G ‘ , Z dela will not otherwiserdisruptrthe schedule for the completion and submission of
CD 4.> y I .
rr
. Q (D comments to the Court by the Expert Advisory Panel as provided in the Court Order dated
<' F8
O r D!. {
g 0 ASSA 4 Jl11‘1C 15,2004. % , _ I_ _ I M I y . I.·fgM;,
*5 r"‘ This is the second enlargement `of timerequested with respect tothis time limitation:
LI :r I V ,` . M,. `~` ‘i · `I ,, » ` , †t . ` [
¤> er I -» I- I - I .
(fbi";) S _, R; ¤I;‘{·` I_ \'.j yr
=¤ X a .2 . 2 C
§ CA `fii
°"'