Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I *4% %se 2:91 -cv-001 NC Document 475 Filed 12€1§/2003 Page 1 of 1
I I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ,
I I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
E P.J., et al., : CIVIL NO.:
~ I Plaintiffs, : 291CVOOI80 (RNC)
I tt i
STATE OF CONNECTICUT, A
t BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al. ; ,.I..‘j; jig " `*j__;_ I
I Defendants. : DECEMBER 10, 22
:Tg§·I·;;; ; —* ,,-
I ` MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME ,0 I
. ;5"..`? ` I
I I The plaintiffs move for a one—week enlargement of time to serve their t . Cj-\ I
I Expert Advisory Panel Report to the United States District Court on the Expert Advisory Panel ` I
l ` I ` I
I I and defendants. In support of this motion the plaintiffs represent the following:
M· _ ` 1. The Court Order dated November 15, 2003 provides that plaintiffs must submit their
\
ig ". comments to the Expert Advisory Panel Report on the Expert Advisory Panel and
1
x. defendants by no later than December 12, 2003.
· l
Q I 2. Plaintiffs are unable to complete and serve their comments by that date due to the
xl I I fact that p1aintiffs’ counsel, Attomey David Shaw, has three days of hearings
0 I Il scheduled during the week beginning December 7, 2003 and is required to submit
O@ I comments to a settlement proposal in ARC/Connecticut v. O ’Meara, No.3:0l CV
{Q` E 1%:31 (JBA) by no later than December 12, 2003. I _ I
N ::3 _ I
Q3. l@6;1ey Ralph Urban, counsel for the defendants has been contacted. He indicates
I as mx It___ Q?
I _t_·-;;’i Z @es not oppose a one~week enlargement of time. I
. ..iqne§¤r·e I
. I Q LU glj I
, II, ‘ if
l
I I
2 1
- - . ~.I . - ‘ · r_ .~ - - - -_ - . .-` -- , . - · — A .·-*·*" :1 L*r=-_l_=‘·.-‘=‘:i·f¢—2Fr¤`?·-F¤*i5·£f#v,2·`·=‘a'_i-_!G?*'.5x.¤I§r*·€Q*§3~gFl}3§{%§;fi>$‘%>&*¥l!$*$f¤*'>3"#>¥~':l§l‘$\'»€7¥2’!¥“?‘7\¢Q¥¢li¥5’E _ "¢ ? ' ·r·‘·:— " Q * 2 * i' -*?' —