/ We 2:91 -cv-001 80-RNC Document 492 Filed 12/21 /2004
P l 0
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT "" "
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ,
ZUUU BEC 20 A ll= IU l
P..I., etal., : CIVIL NO. _ __ _, H _
Plaintiffs, ; zsicvooi so (RNC)- = s y ¤_ a _{t_Q,g_ €Z0=iJlIT ¤
{ v_ ; ._.· H 2.1:. X
STATE or cormecrtcur, ct ai. { _ _
_ X5 Defendants. : DECEMBER 17, 2004
V MOTION TO FILE REPLY BRIEF l
I THAT EXCEEDS PAGE LIMIT I
l * l
` The plaintiffs request permission to tile a Reply brief that exceeds the ten page limit set .
I l
forth in paragraph 7(ci), Fe. R. Civ. P. In support of this motion, the plaintiffs represent that I
i defendants’ Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for an Award of Costs and
i Att0meys’ Fees raises novel and complex issues that were not addressed in Plaintiffs’ Motion i
B I for an Award of Costs and Attomeys’ Fees. As the proper resolution of these issues is i
I important to the future of this litigation and to securing the benefits of the Settlement
3 Agreement to the class as a whole, plaintiffs request permission to exceed the page limit so that
Q the issues ra.ised by defendants can be fully and completely addressed.
Q Ln ·‘ It-- i
J' · l
_ KI KENT .
S p_ fj PLAINTIl§FS N
I". E.:) il-ll ` U
Ig cw {ff By drgigéi. C 4 l/ F
•=¤¤·.:» David C. Shaw, 1
Q ~- `S__‘I. , Fed. Bar No. ct05239 i
§ Ii}- 34 Jerome Ave., Suite 210
A Bloomfield, CT 06002
(860) 242-1238
)~ Email dcshaw(r.Qcttel.net
3 ` l
’\ . `
L .
r l