Free Case Transferred In - District Transfer - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:05-cv-00773-JJF Document 38-7 Case 3:05-cv-02669-MHP Document 5

Filed 07/05/2005 Page 11 of 1 Filed 01/12/2006 Page of 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 DAVID E. LIPTON, et al., 7 Plaintiffs, 8 9 10 INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant. ___________________________________/ The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a United States District Judge because either: XX (1) One or more of the parties has requested reassignment to a United States District Judge or has v. No. C-05-02669 EDL NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

not consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge, or (2) One or more of the parties has sought a type of judicial action (e.g., a temporary restraining

order) that a United States Magistrate Judge may not take without the consent of all parties, the necessary consents have not been secured, and time is of the essence. The CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE previously scheduled for November 1, 2005, at 10:00 a.m. on Magistrate Judge Laporte's calendar will NOT be held.

Dated: July 5, 2005

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk United States District Court /s/ By: Lili M. Harrell Deputy Clerk