Free Case Transferred In - District Transfer - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:05-cv-00773-JJF Document 38-12 Case 3:05-cv-02669-MHP Document 10

Filed 07/07/2005 Page 11 of 4 Filed 01/12/2006 Page of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA [PROPOSED] RELATED CASE ORDER A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been filed. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. As the judge assigned to the earliest filed case below that bears my initials, I find that the more recently filed case(s) that I have initialed below are related to the case assigned to me, and such case(s) shall be reassigned to me. Any cases listed below that are not related to the case assigned to me (Lipton v. Intel Corp., No. C:05-2669 (MHP)) are referred to the judge assigned to the next-earliest filed case for a related case determination. No. C:05-2700 (MHP) Konieczka v. Intel Corp. (N.D. Cal., filed June 30, 2005)

I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. _______ No. C:05-2699 (JL) Prohias v. Intel Corp. (N.D. Cal., filed June 30, 2005)

I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. _______ No. C:05-2720 (JCS) Niehaus v. Intel Corp. (N.D. Cal., filed July 1, 2005)

I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. _______ No. C:05-2721 (JCS) Hamilton v. Intel Corp. (N.D. Cal., filed July 1, 2005)

I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. _______ No. C:05-2743 (BZ) Brauch v. Intel Corp. (N.D. Cal., filed July 5, 2005)

I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. _______ No. C:05-2758 (EMC) Baxley v. Intel Corp. (N.D. Cal., filed July 6, 2005)

I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. _______

56538.1

1

Case 1:05-cv-00773-JJF Document 38-12 Case 3:05-cv-02669-MHP Document 10

Filed 07/07/2005 Page 22 of 4 Filed 01/12/2006 Page of 4

ORDER Counsel are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the initials of the newly assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the dates for the conference, disclosures and report required by FRCivP 16 and 26 accordingly. Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be renoticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines set by the ADR Local Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned judge. Dated: ______________________ ____________________________ Hon. Marilyn H. Patel United States District Judge

56538.1

2

Case 1:05-cv-00773-JJF Document 38-12 Case 3:05-cv-02669-MHP Document 10

Filed 07/07/2005 Page 33 of 4 Filed 01/12/2006 Page of 4

CLERK'S NOTICE The court has reviewed the motion and determined that no cases are related and no reassignments shall occur. Richard W. Wieking, Clerk Dated: ___________________ By: _________________________ Deputy Clerk

56538.1

3

Case 1:05-cv-00773-JJF Document 38-12 Case 3:05-cv-02669-MHP Document 10

Filed 07/07/2005 Page 44 of 4 Filed 01/12/2006 Page of 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on the date stated below, I lodged a copy of this order with each judicial officer and I mailed a copy to each counsel of record or pro se party in the cases listed above. Richard W. Wieking, Clerk Dated: ___________________ By: _________________________ Deputy Clerk

56538.1

4