Free Case Transferred In - District Transfer - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:05-cv-00773-JJF Document 38-11 Filed 07/07/2005 Page 1 1 of 2 Case 3:05-cv-02669-MHP Document 9 Filed 01/12/2006 Page of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

FREDERICK P. FURTH (No. 38438) MICHAEL P. LEHMANN (No. 77152) THOMAS P. DOVE (No. 51921) ALEX C. TURAN (No. 227273) THE FURTH FIRM LLP 225 Bush Street, 15th Floor San Francisco, California 94104-4249 Telephone: (415) 433-2070 Facsimile: (415) 982-2076 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Michael Brauch and Andrew Meimes (N.D. Cal. Case No. C:05-2743 (BZ)) (Additional Counsel are listed on Signature Page) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION DAVID E. LIPTON, et al., on behalf of ) themselves and all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) vs. ) ) INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware ) corporation, ) ) Defendant. ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. C:05-2669 (MHP) DECLARATION OF MICHAEL P. LEHMANN IN SUPPORT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED

1. I am counsel of record for plaintiffs Michael Brauch and Andrew Meimes in the case of Brauch v. Intel Corp., No. C:05-2743 (BZ) (N.D. Cal., filed July 5, 2005) ("Brauch"). 2. I submit this declaration pursuant to Civ. Local Rule 7-11(a) in support of the Brauch plaintiffs' motion to have the Brauch case and the cases of Konieczka v. Intel Corp., No. C:05-2700 (MHP) (N.D. Cal., filed June 30, 2005) ("Konieczka"); Prohias v. Intel Corp., No. C:05-2699 (JL) (N.D. Cal., filed June 30, 2005) ("Prohias"); Niehaus v. Intel Corp., No. C:05-2720 (JCS) (N.D. Cal., filed July 1, 2005) ("Niehaus"); Hamilton v. Intel Corp., No. C:05-2721 (JCS) (N.D. Cal., filed July 1, 2005) ("Hamilton"); Baxley v. Intel Corp., No. C:05-2758 (EMC) (N.D. Cal., filed July 6, 2005) ("Baxley"); and Lipton v. Intel
56536.1

DECLARATION OF MICHAEL P. LEHMANN IN SUPPORT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED

Case 1:05-cv-00773-JJF Document 38-11 Filed 07/07/2005 Page 2 2 of 2 Case 3:05-cv-02669-MHP Document 9 Filed 01/12/2006 Page of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Corp., No. C:05-2669 (MHP) (N.D. Cal., filed June 29, 2005) ("Lipton") treated as related cases within the meaning of Civ. Local Rule 3-12(a). 3. I contacted attorneys at the firm of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, who represent the plaintiffs in the cases other than Brauch listed above and they have agreed that these cases should be treated as related cases. 4. I have not been able to contact anyone representing Intel Corporation. To the best of my knowledge, no counsel has made an appearance on its behalf in any of these cases. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States and the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 7th day of July, 2005 in San Francisco, California. By: /s/ Michael P. Lehmann Michael P. Lehmann

-2DECLARATION OF MICHAEL P. LEHMANN IN SUPPORT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED
56536.1