Free Case Transferred In - District Transfer - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF

Document 16

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 4

ADRMOP, CLOSED, E-Filing, RELATE, STAYED

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:05-cv-03271-MHP

Juan v. Intel Corporation Assigned to: Hon. Marilyn H. Patel Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle Plaintiff Jose Juan

Date Filed: 08/10/2005 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 410 Anti-Trust Jurisdiction: Federal Question

represented by David Boies, III Straus & Boies, LLP 4041 University Drive 5th Floor Fairfax, VA 22030 703-764-8700 Fax: 703-764-8704 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Donald F. Drummond Drummond & Associates One California Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415-433-2261 Fax: 415-438-9819 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Ian Otto Straus & Boies LLP 4041 University Drive 5th Floor Fairfax, VA 22030 703-764-8700 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Timothy D. Battin Straus & Boies LLP 4041 University Dr. 5th Floor Fairfax, VA 22030 703-764-8700

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF

Document 16

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 4

Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED V. Defendant Intel Corporation a Delaware corporation represented by Christopher B. Hockett Bingham McCutchen LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 415-393-2000 Fax: 415-393-2286 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Joy K. Fuyuno Bingham McCutchen LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 415-393-2000 Fax: 415-393-2286 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed 08/10/2005

#

Docket Text 1 ANTI TRUST COMPLAINT: 28: USC 1332(D) UNREASONABLE RESTRAINT, ANTI-COMPETITIVE ACTIONS against defendant Intel Corporation ( Filing fee $ 250, receipt number 3375365.). Filed by petitioner Jose Juan. Jury Demand, Summons Issued. (db, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2005) Additional attachment(s) added on 8/24/2005 (tn, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 08/12/2005) CASE DESIGNATED for Electronic Filing. (db, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2005) (Entered: 08/12/2005) 2 ADR SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Statement due by 12/7/2005. Case Management Conference set for 12/14/2005 01:30 PM.. Signed by Judge Chen on 8/10/05. (db, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2005) Additional attachment(s) added on 8/12/2005 (tn, COURT STAFF). Additional attachment(s) added on 8/12/2005 (tn, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 08/12/2005) 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Intel Corporation. (Hockett, Christopher) (Filed on 9/12/2005) (Entered: 09/12/2005)

08/10/2005 08/10/2005

09/12/2005

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF

Document 16

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 3 of 4

09/12/2005

4 Statement of Facts DEFENDANT'S FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 7.1 AND CIVIL LOCAL RULE 3-16 DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS filed byIntel Corporation. (Hockett, Christopher) (Filed on 9/12/2005) (Entered: 09/12/2005) 5 ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/14/05. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2005) (Entered: 09/14/2005) 6 ORDER RELATING C 05-3271 EMC, C 05-3272 JL, C 05-3273 EMC, AND C 05-3277 EDL to C 05-2669 MHP; Case reassigned to Judge Marilyn H. Patel for all further proceedings; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 9/26/2005. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2005) (Entered: 09/29/2005) 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, filed by Intel Corporation. (Hockett, Christopher) (Filed on 10/3/2005) (Entered: 10/03/2005) 8 Declaration of Richard A. Ripley in Support of 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, filed byIntel Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C) (Related document(s)7) (Hockett, Christopher) (Filed on 10/3/2005) (Entered: 10/03/2005) 9 Proposed Order re 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, by Intel Corporation. (Hockett, Christopher) (Filed on 10/3/2005) (Entered: 10/03/2005) 10 ORDER by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel granting 7 defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re 7 1 Complaint, (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2005) (Entered: 10/05/2005) 11 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES PENDING THE OUTCOME OF THE MOTION TO TRANSFER AND COORDINATE OR CONSOLIDATE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1407 by Intel Corporation. (Fuyuno, Joy) (Filed on 11/1/2005) (Entered: 11/01/2005) 12 STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING CASE pending MDL determination; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 11/7/2005. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2005) (Entered: 11/08/2005) 13 Letter from Joy K. Fuyuno re MDL Transfer Order of November 8, 2005. (Attachments: # 1 MDL Transfer Order)(Fuyuno, Joy) (Filed on 11/17/2005) (Entered: 11/17/2005) 14 ORDER STATISTICALLY DISMISSING CASE pending MDL determination; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 1/5/2006. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2006) (Entered: 01/05/2006) 15 ORDER of Transfer by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to transfer case to USDC for the District of Delaware (In Re Intel Corporation, Inc., Antitrust Litigation - MDL - 1717). (gba, COURT

09/14/2005

09/29/2005

10/03/2005

10/03/2005

10/03/2005

10/05/2005

11/01/2005

11/08/2005

11/17/2005

01/05/2006

01/10/2006

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF

Document 16

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 4 of 4

STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2006) (Entered: 01/11/2006) 01/11/2006 16 Certified copy of transfer order, docket sheet along with the original case file sent to USDC for the District of Delaware (MDL - 1717). (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2006) (Entered: 01/11/2006)

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
01/18/2006 09:18:12 PACER Login: ud0037 Description: Billable Pages: 2 Client Code: Cost: 0.16 Docket Report Search Criteria: 3:05-cv-03271-MHP

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 11 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 22 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 33 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 44 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 55 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 66 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 77 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 88 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 99 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 10 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 10 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 11 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 11 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 12 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 12 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 13 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 13 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 14 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 14 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 15 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 15 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 16 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 16 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 17 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 17 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 18 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 18 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 19 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 19 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 20 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 20 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 21 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 21 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 22 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 22 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 23 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 23 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-3 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 2-1

Filed 08/10/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 1 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) JOSE JUAN ) Plaintiff(s) ) ) C 05-03271 EMC -v) ) ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT INTEL CORPORATION ) CONFERENCE Defendant(s) ) ______________________________) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is assigned to the Honorable Edward M. Chen. When serving the complaint or notice of removal, the plaintiff or removing defendant must serve on all other parties a copy of this order, the handbook entitled "Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California," the Notice of Assignment to United States Magistrate Judge for Trial, and all other documents specified in Civil Local Rule 4-2. Counsel must comply with the case schedule listed below unless the Court otherwise orders. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is assigned to the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Multi-Option Program governed by ADR Local Rule 3. Counsel and clients must familiarize themselves with that rule and with the handbook entitled "Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California." CASE SCHEDULE [ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM]

Date Event Governing Rule ------------------------------------------------------------------------08/10/2005 Complaint filed 11/23/2005 Last day to meet and confer re initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan 11/23/2005 Last day to file Joint ADR Certification with Stipulation to ADR process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference 12/07/2005 Last day to complete initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report, file/serve Case Management Statement, and file/serve Rule 26(f) Report 12/14/2005 Case Management Conference in Ctrm C, 15th Floor at 1:30 PM FRCivP 26(f) & ADR LR 3-5 Civil L.R. 16-8

FRCivP 26(a)(1) Civil L.R.16-9

Civil L.R. 16-10

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-4 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 2-2

Filed 08/10/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 4 Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL PRACTICE IN CASES ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE EDWARD M. CHEN (1/6/03)

The parties shall follow the General Orders of the Court for the Northern District of California, the Local Rules, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, except as expressly modified herein. Failure to comply with any of the rules and orders may be deemed sufficient grounds for monetary sanctions, dismissal, entry of default judgment, or other appropriate sanctions. The rules and orders are supplemented and modified as follows:

A. 1.

STANDING ORDER RE MOTIONS AND CONFERENCES Criminal Law and Motion is heard on Wednesdays at 9:30 a.m. Civil Law and

Motion is heard on Wednesdays at 10:30 a.m. Counsel need not reserve a hearing date in advance for civil motions. However, noticed dates may be reset as the Court's calendar requires. 2. 3. Case Management Conferences are heard on Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. Pretrial In cases that are randomly assigned to Judge Chen for all purposes, the parties are Conferences are heard on Wednesdays at 3:00 p.m. requested to file their written consent to the assignment of a U.S. Magistrate Judge for all purposes, or their written declination of consent, as soon as possible. 4. 5. 6. All scheduling questions should be addressed to Judge Chen's courtroom deputy, Law and motion matters may be submitted without argument upon stipulation of In all "E-Filing" cases, when filing papers that require the Court to take any Betty Fong, at (415) 522-2034. the parties and notification of the Court no later than two (2) court days before the hearing. action (e.g. motions, meet and confer letters, administrative requests), the parties shall, in addition to filing papers electronically, lodge with chambers a printed copy of the papers on three-hole punch paper (including all exhibits) by the close of the next court day following the day the papers are filed electronically. These printed copies shall be marked "EMC Chambers Copy" and shall be submitted to the Clerk's Office in an envelope clearly marked with the case number, "Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen," and "E-Filing Chambers Copy." Parties shall not file a paper copy of any document with the Clerk's

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-4 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 2-2

Filed 08/10/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 4 Page 2 of 4

Office that has already been filed electronically. A proposed order in an E-Filing case must be emailed to [email protected] as a WordPerfect attachment on the same day that it is E-Filed. With permission, Chambers' copes of documents may be submitted on CDROM with hypertext links to exhibits. 7. The Court can no longer supply a court reporter. If you wish to have this hearing

recorded by a court reporter rather than by electronic means, please arrange this privately.

B.

STANDING ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTES

This Standing Order applies to all disclosures and discovery motions assigned to Judge Chen and is intended to supplement the Civil Local Rules of this District regarding motion practice (Civil L. R. 7-1 et seq.) and the resolution of disclosure or discovery disputes (Civil L. R. 37-1 et seq.). 8. Discovery motions may be addressed to the Court in three ways. A motion may be noticed on not less than thirty-five (35) days notice pursuant to Civil L. R. 7-2. Alternatively, any party may seek an order shortening time under Civil L. R. 6-3 if the circumstances justify that relief. In emergencies during discovery events (such as depositions), the Court is available pursuant to Civil L. R. 37-1(b). In the event a discovery dispute arises, counsel for the party seeking discovery shall in good faith confer in person with counsel for the party failing to make the discovery in an effort to resolve the dispute without court action, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 and Civil L. R. 37-1(a). The meeting must be in person, except where good cause is shown why a telephone meeting is adequate. A declaration setting forth these meet and confer efforts, and the final positions of each party, shall be included in the moving papers. The Court will not consider discovery motions unless the moving party has complied with Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 and Civil L. R. 37-1(a). 9. Motions for sanctions shall be filed by separate motion in accordance with the Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 and Civil L. R. 37-3. The parties shall comply with their meet and confer obligations pursuant to Civil L. R. 37-1(a). Parties who refuse to meet and confer will be subject to sanctions pursuant to Civil L. R. 37-3. 10. Any party filing an Emergency or Ex Parte Application must contact Judge Chen's courtroom deputy clerk, Betty Fong, at 415/522-2034. PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-4 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 2-2

Filed 08/10/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 3 of 4 Page 3 of 4

11.

In responding to requests for documents and materials under Fed. R. Civ. P. 34,

all parties shall affirmatively state in a written response served on all other parties the full extent to which they will produce materials and shall, promptly after the production, confirm in writing that they have produced all such materials so described that are locatable after a diligent search of all locations at which such materials might plausibly exist. It shall not be sufficient to object and/or to state that "responsive" materials will be or have been produced. 12. In searching for responsive materials in connection with a request under Fed. R. Civ. P. 34, parties must search computerized files, emails, voicemails, work files, desk files, calendars and diaries, and any other locations and sources if materials of the type to be produced might plausibly be expected to be found there. 13. Privilege logs shall be promptly provided and must be sufficiently detailed and informative to justify the privilege. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5). No generalized claims of privilege or work product protection shall be permitted. With respect to each communication for which a claim of privilege or work product is made, the asserting party must at the time of its assertion identify: (a) all persons making and receiving the privileged or protected communication; (b) the steps taken to ensure the confidentiality of the communication, including affirmation that no unauthorized persons have received the communication; (c) the date of the communication; and (d) the subject matter of the communication. Failure to furnish this information at the time of the assertion may be deemed a waiver of the privilege or protection. 14. To the maximum extent feasible, all party files and records should be retained and produced in their original form and sequence, including file folders, and the originals should remain available for inspection by any counsel on reasonable notice. 15. As soon as a party has notice of this order, the party shall take such reasonable steps as are necessary to preserve evidence related to the issues presented by the action, including, without limitation, interdiction of any document destruction programs and any ongoing erasures of emails, voicemails, and other electronically recorded material to the extent necessary to preserve information relevant to the issues presented by the action. 16. Except for good cause, no item will be received in evidence if the proponent failed to produce it in the face of a reasonable and proper discovery request covering the item, regardless of whether a motion to overrule any objection thereto was made. DEPOSITIONS 17. Absent extraordinary circumstances, counsel shall consult in advance with opposing counsel and unrepresented proposed deponents to schedule depositions at mutually convenient times and places. Where an agreement cannot be reached as to any party deponent or

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-4 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 2-2

Filed 08/10/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 4 of 4 Page 4 of 4

a deponent represented by counsel of record, the following procedure may be invoked by the party seeking any such deposition. The party seeking such a deposition may notice it at least thirty (30) days in advance. If the noticed date and place is unacceptable to the deponent or the deponent's counsel, then within ten (10) days or receipt of the notice, the deponent or counsel for the deponent must reply and counter-propose in writing an alternative date and place falling within thirty (30) days of the date noticed by the party seeking the deposition. 18. Counsel and parties shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(d)(1). Deposition objections must be as to privilege or form only. Speaking objections are prohibited. When a privilege is claimed, the witness should nevertheless answer questions relevant to the existence, extent or waiver of the privilege, such as the date of a communication, who made the statement, to whom and in whose presence the statement was made, other persons to whom the contents of the statement have been disclosed, and the general subject matter of the statement, unless such information itself is itself privileged. Private conferences between deponents and attorneys in the course of interrogation, including a line of related questions, are improper and prohibited except for the sole purpose of determining whether a privilege should be asserted. SANCTIONS 19. copy. ________________________________ Edward M. Chen United States Magistrate Judge Failure to comply with this Order or the Local Rules of this Court may result in sanctions. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f), Civil L. R. 1-4.

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-5 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 3

Filed 09/12/2005 Page 11 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP DAVID M. BALABANIAN (SBN 37368) CHRISTOPHER B. HOCKETT (SBN 121539) JOY K. FUYUNO (SBN 193890) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE JUAN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

No. C-05-3271 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

IT IS STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL AS FOLLOWS: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Jose Juan and Defendant Intel Corporation hereby stipulate that Intel Corporation's response to Plaintiff's complaint be extended 30 days, up to and including October 12, 2005. This is the first stipulation between the parties. Because this litigation has just begun, granting such a stipulation will not have any negative impact on the schedule of this case. /// /// ///
Case No. C-05-3271

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
SF/21635197.1

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-5 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 3

Filed 09/12/2005 Page 22 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2

DATED: September 12, 2005 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
SF/21635197.1

By:

/s/ Joy K. Fuyuno Joy K. Fuyuno Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

DATED: September 12, 2005 DRUMMOND & ASSOCIATES

By:

/s/ Donald F. Drummond Donald F. Drummond Attorneys for Plaintiff Jose Juan

Case No. C-05-3271

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-5 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 3

Filed 09/12/2005 Page 33 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5

[Proposed] Order to Extend Response Time IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Intel Corporation shall have up to and including October 12, 2005 to respond to Plaintiff Jose Juan's complaint. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September ____, 2005

6 _____________________________ 7 United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
SF/21635197.1

Case No. C-05-3271

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-6 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 4

Filed 09/12/2005 Page 11 of 2 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP DAVID M. BALABANIAN (SBN 37368) CHRISTOPHER B. HOCKETT (SBN 121539) JOY K. FUYUNO (SBN 193890) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

JOSE JUAN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

No. C-05-3271 DEFENDANT'S FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 7.1 AND CIVIL LOCAL RULE 3-16 DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Pursuant to Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the undersigned certifies that there is no parent company and no publicly held entity that owns 10% or more of Intel. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-16, the undersigned certifies that as of this date, other than the named parties, there is no such interest to report. /// /// /// /// ///
Case No. C-05-3271

DEFENDANT'S FRCP 7.1 AND CIVIL L.R. 3-16 DISCLOSURES
SF/21635228.1

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-6 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 4

Filed 09/12/2005 Page 22 of 2 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

1 2

DATED: September 12, 2005 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
DEFENDANT'S FRCP 7.1 AND CIVIL L.R. 3-16 DISCLOSURES
SF/21635228.1

By:

/s/ Joy K. Fuyuno Joy K. Fuyuno Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

Case No. C-05-3271

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-7 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 5

Filed 09/14/2005 Page 11 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP DAVID M. BALABANIAN (SBN 37368) CHRISTOPHER B. HOCKETT (SBN 121539) JOY K. FUYUNO (SBN 193890) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE JUAN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

No. C-05-3271 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

IT IS STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL AS FOLLOWS: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Jose Juan and Defendant Intel Corporation hereby stipulate that Intel Corporation's response to Plaintiff's complaint be extended 30 days, up to and including October 12, 2005. This is the first stipulation between the parties. Because this litigation has just begun, granting such a stipulation will not have any negative impact on the schedule of this case. /// /// ///
Case No. C-05-3271

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
SF/21635197.1

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-7 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 5

Filed 09/14/2005 Page 22 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2

DATED: September 12, 2005 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
SF/21635197.1

By:

/s/ Joy K. Fuyuno Joy K. Fuyuno Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

DATED: September 12, 2005 DRUMMOND & ASSOCIATES

By:

/s/ Donald F. Drummond Donald F. Drummond Attorneys for Plaintiff Jose Juan

Case No. C-05-3271

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-7 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 5

Filed 09/14/2005 Page 33 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

[Proposed] Order to Extend Response Time IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Intel Corporation shall have up to and including October 12, 2005 to respond to Plaintiff Jose Juan's complaint.
UNIT ED

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September ____, 2005 14

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

D United States IS T RIC T OJudge District Edward M. Chen United States Magistrate Judge

ER

N

F

3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
SF/21635197.1

Case No. C-05-3271

A

C

LI

_____________________________
RT
H

FO

Judge E

dward M

. Chen

R NIA

RT U O

NO

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-8 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 6

Filed 09/29/2005 Page 11 of 2 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-8 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 6

Filed 09/29/2005 Page 22 of 2 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-9 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 7

Filed 10/03/2005 Page 11 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-9 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 7

Filed 10/03/2005 Page 22 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-9 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 7

Filed 10/03/2005 Page 33 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-9 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 7

Filed 10/03/2005 Page 44 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-9 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 7

Filed 10/03/2005 Page 55 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-10 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-1

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 11of 44 Page of

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-10 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-1

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 22of 44 Page of

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-10 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-1

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 33of 44 Page of

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-10 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-1

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 44of 44 Page of

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 11of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 22of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 33of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 44of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 55of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 66of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 77of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 88of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 99of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 10 of 11 Page 10 of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 11 of 11 Page 11 of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 11of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 22of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 33of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 44of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 55of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 66of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 77of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 88of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 99of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 10 of 17 Page 10 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 11 of 17 Page 11 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 12 of 17 Page 12 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 13 of 17 Page 13 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 14 of 17 Page 14 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 15 of 17 Page 15 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 16 of 17 Page 16 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 17 of 17 Page 17 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-13 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-4

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 11of 33 Page of

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-13 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-4

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 22of 33 Page of

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-13 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 8-4

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 33of 33 Page of

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-14 Filed 10/03/2005 Page 1 1 of 1 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 9 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 1

Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 9 Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-15 Filed 10/03/2005 Page 1 1 of 1 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 10 Filed 10/05/2005 Page 1of 1 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 1

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

ER

N

D IS T IC T R

OF

A

C

LI

FO

Ju

rilyn H dge Ma

. Patel

R NIA

RT U O

NO

RT

H

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-16 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 11

Filed 11/01/2005 Page 11 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP DAVID M. BALABANIAN (SBN 37368) CHRISTOPHER B. HOCKETT (SBN 121539) JOY K. FUYUNO (SBN 193890) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 Facsimile: (415) 393-2286 Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

JOSE JUAN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant.

No. C-05-3271-MHP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES PENDING THE OUTCOME OF THE MOTION TO TRANSFER AND COORDINATE OR CONSOLIDATE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1407

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

WHEREAS, on August 10, 2005, Plaintiff filed the instant action in the Northern District of California ("Juan Action"); WHEREAS, on or about July 11, 2005, the plaintiffs in Brauch, et al. v. Intel Corp., No. C 05-2743 (BZ) (N. D. Cal., filed July 5, 2005), a related matter, moved before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation ("MDL"), to transfer and coordinate or consolidate for pre-trial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 407 ("MDL Motion"), and the Juan Action has been identified as a related action subject to that motion;

SF/21642115.1

Case No. C 05-3271 (MHP)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-16 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 11

Filed 11/01/2005 Page 22 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
SF/21642115.1

WHEREAS, on or about September 29, 2005, Judge Patel issued a Related Case Order relating this case to an earlier filed case assigned to her, and canceling or staying certain but not all dates, events and deadlines in the action; WHEREAS, to date, a decision has not been rendered on the MDL Motion; WHEREAS, the outcome of the MDL Motion will impact significantly the schedule of this case; THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, by and among counsel for Plaintiff Juan, and counsel for Defendant Intel Corporation, that any events, dates or deadlines set by the Local Rules or Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including the Local Rules for Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR Local Rules") and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26, and any deadlines established in any case management order applicable to this case should be stayed pending the outcome of the aforementioned MDL Motion; and IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by the aforementioned parties that if a case management conference is rescheduled by the Court, the parties shall adjust the dates for any conference, disclosures or reports required by the Local Rules or Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including the ADR Local Rules and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26 accordingly. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED. Dated: November 1, 2005 DRUMMOND & ASSOCIATES By: /s/ Donald F. Drummond Donald F. Drummond Attorneys for Plaintiff Jose Juan

2

Case No. C 05-3271 (MHP)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-16 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 11

Filed 11/01/2005 Page 33 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Dated: November 1, 2005

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP By: ________/s/_Joy K. Fuyuno____ Joy K. Fuyuno Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES PENDING THE OUTCOME OF THE MDL MOTION Any events, dates or deadlines set by the Local Rules or Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including the Local Rules for Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR Local Rules") and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26, and any deadlines established in any case management order applicable to this case are hereby stayed pending the outcome of the motion to transfer and coordinate or consolidate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 ("MDL Motion"). Upon the determination of the MDL Motion, if it is necessary for the Court to reschedule a case management conference, the parties shall adjust the dates for any conference, disclosures or reports required by the ADR Local Rules and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26 accordingly. The parties shall notify the Clerk of Court within 10 days of the decision on the MDL Motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: Honorable Marilyn H. Patel United States District Court Judge

SF/21642115.1

3

Case No. C 05-3271 (MHP)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-17 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 12

Filed 11/08/2005 Page 11 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-17 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 12

Filed 11/08/2005 Page 22 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-17 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 12

Filed 11/08/2005 Page 33 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-18 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 13-1

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-18 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 13-1

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-19 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 13-2

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 4 Page 1 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-19 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 13-2

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 4 Page 2 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-19 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 13-2

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 3 of 4 Page 3 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-19 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 13-2

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 4 of 4 Page 4 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-20 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 14

Filed 01/05/2006 Page 11 of 1 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 1

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 11 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 22 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 33 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 44 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 55 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 66 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 77 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 88 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-22 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 16

Filed 01/11/2006 Page 11 of 2 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94102

_____________

www.cand.uscourts.gov Richard W. Wieking Clerk General Court Number 415.522.2000

January 11, 2006 United States District Court for the District of Delaware Lockbox 18 844 North King Street Boggs Federal Building Wilmington, Delaware 19801 RE: In Re Intel Corporation, Inc., Antitrust Litigation - MDL - 1717 CV 05-2830 MHP 05-894 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2831 MHP 05-895 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2834 MHP 05-896 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2858 MHP 05-897 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2859 MHP 05-898 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2882 MHP 05-899 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2897 MHP 05-900 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2898 MHP 05-901 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2916 MHP 05-902 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2957 MHP 05-903 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3028 MHP 05-904 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3094 MHP 05-905 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3197 MHP 05-906 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3271 MHP 05-907 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3272 MHP 05-908 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3273 MHP 05-909 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3277 MHP 05-910 JJF (D/DE)

Dear Clerk, Pursuant to an order transferring the above captioned cases to your court, transmitted herewith are: (U) (U) (U) Certified copy of docket entries Certified copy of TRANSFERRAL ORDER Original case file documents

(U) Please be advised that the above entitled action was previously designated to the Electronic Case Filing program. You can access electronically filed documents through PACER referencing the Northern District of California case number at https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov Please acknowledge receipt of the above documents on the attached copy of this letter.

Case 1:05-cv-00907-JJF Document 16-22 Case 3:05-cv-03271-MHP Document 16

Filed 01/11/2006 Page 22 of 2 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

Sincerely, RICHARD W. WIEKING, Clerk

by: Gina Agustine-Rivas Case Systems Administrator Enclosures Copies to counsel of record