Free Case Transferred In - District Transfer - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF

Document 20

Filed 01/18/2006 ADRMOP, CLOSED, Page 1 of 3 E-Filing, RELATE, STAYED

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:05-cv-03094-MHP

Juskiewicz v. Intel Corporation Assigned to: Hon. Marilyn H. Patel Demand: $0 Cause: 15:15 Antitrust Litigation Plaintiff Karol Juskiewicz on behalf of himself & all others similarly situated

Date Filed: 07/29/2005 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 410 Anti-Trust Jurisdiction: Federal Question represented by Joseph M. Patane Law Offices of Joseph M. Patane 2280 Union Street San Francisco, CA 94123 415/563-7200 Fax: 415/346-0679 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Mario Nunzio Alioto Trump Alioto Trump & Prescott LLP 2280 Union Street San Francisco, CA 94123 415/563-7200 Fax: 415/346-0679 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V. Defendant Intel Corporation a Delaware Corporation represented by Christopher B. Hockett Bingham McCutchen LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 415-393-2000 Fax: 415-393-2286 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Joy K. Fuyuno Bingham McCutchen LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 415-393-2000 Fax: 415-393-2286 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed 07/29/2005

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF #

Document 20

Filed 01/18/2006 Docket Text

Page 2 of 3

1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT & Jury Trial Demanded - [Summons Issued] against Intel Corporation, [Filing Fee: $250.00, Receipt Number 3374935]. Filed by Plaintiff Karol Juskiewicz. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2005) Additional attachment(s) added on 11/9/2005 (tn, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 08/01/2005) SUMMONS Issued as to Intel Corporation. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/01/2005) 2 ADR SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Statement due 11/21/2005 & Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/28/2005 04:00 PM. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order).(tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2005) (Entered: 08/01/2005) CASE DESIGNATED for Electronic Filing. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/01/2005) 3 NOTICE OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman recused.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 8/4/2005. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2005) (Entered: 08/04/2005) 4 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Samuel Conti for all further proceedings. Judge Bernard Zimmerman no longer assigned to case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 8/5/05. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2005) (Entered: 08/05/2005) 5 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 8/5/05. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2005) (Entered: 08/05/2005) 6 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Maxine M. Chesney for all further proceedings. Judge Samuel Conti no longer assigned to case. Signed by EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE on 8/8/05. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2005) (Entered: 08/08/2005) 7 ORDER OF RECUSAL signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 8, 2005. Judge Maxine M. Chesney recused. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2005) (Entered: 08/08/2005) 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Jeffrey S. White for all further proceedings. Judge Maxine M. Chesney no longer assigned to case. Signed by EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE on 8/11/05. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2005) (Entered: 08/11/2005) 9 INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER: Case Management Conference set for 11/18/2005 01:30 PM. Case Management Statement due by 11/10/2005.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/12/05. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2005) (Entered: 08/15/2005) 10 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE FILING DATE FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT by Intel Corporation. (Hockett, Christopher) (Filed on 8/17/2005) (Entered: 08/17/2005) 11 ORDER GRANTING 10 Stipulation to Continue Filing Date for Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on August 18, 2005. (jswlc3, COURTSTAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2005) (Entered: 08/18/2005) 12 Statement of Facts DEFENDANT INTEL CORPORATION'S FED. R. CIV. PROC. 7.1 AND CIVIL L.R. 3-16 DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS filed byIntel Corporation. (Hockett, Christopher) (Filed on 8/26/2005) (Entered: 08/26/2005) 13 ORDER RELATING CASE to C 05-2669 MHP; Case reassigned to Judge Marilyn H. Patel for all further proceedings; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 10/4/2005. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2005) (Entered: 10/04/2005) 14 CLERK'S NOTICE re: Failure to E-File and/or Failure to Register as an E-Filer re: #1

07/29/2005 07/29/2005

07/29/2005 08/04/2005

08/05/2005

08/05/2005 08/08/2005

08/08/2005

08/11/2005

08/15/2005

08/17/2005

08/18/2005

08/26/2005

10/04/2005

10/20/2005

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20 Class Action Complaint. (gba, COURTFiled 01/18/2006 10/20/2005) (Entered: STAFF) (Filed on Page 3 of 3 10/20/2005) 10/28/2005 15 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES PENDING THE OUTCOME OF THE MOTION TO TRANSFER AND COORDINATE OR CONSOLIDATE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1407 by Intel Corporation. (Fuyuno, Joy) (Filed on 10/28/2005) (Entered: 10/28/2005) 16 ORDER STAYING CASE pending MDL determination; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 10/31/2005. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2005) (Entered: 11/01/2005) 17 Letter from Joy K. Fuyuno re MDL Transfer Order of November 8, 2005. (Attachments: # 1 MDL Transfer Order)(Fuyuno, Joy) (Filed on 11/17/2005) (Entered: 11/17/2005) 18 ORDER STATISTICALLY DISMISSING CASE pending MDL determination; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 1/5/2006. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2006) (Entered: 01/05/2006) 19 ORDER of Transfer by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to transfer case to USDC for the District of Delaware (In Re Intel Corporation, Inc., Antitrust Litigation MDL - 1717). (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2006) (Entered: 01/11/2006) 20 Certified copy of transfer order, docket sheet along with the original case file sent to USDC for the District of Delaware (MDL - 1717). (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2006) (Entered: 01/11/2006)

11/01/2005 11/17/2005 01/05/2006

01/10/2006

01/11/2006

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
01/18/2006 09:02:41 PACER Login: ud0037 Description: Billable Pages: 2 Client Code: Cost: 0.16 Docket Report Search Criteria: 3:05-cv-03094-MHP

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-2 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 1

Filed 07/29/2005 Page 11 of 20 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 20

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-2 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 1

Filed 07/29/2005 Page 22 of 20 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 20

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-2 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 1

Filed 07/29/2005 Page 33 of 20 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 20

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-2 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 1

Filed 07/29/2005 Page 44 of 20 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 20

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-2 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 1

Filed 07/29/2005 Page 55 of 20 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 20

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-2 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 1

Filed 07/29/2005 Page 66 of 20 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 20

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-2 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 1

Filed 07/29/2005 Page 77 of 20 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 20

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-2 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 1

Filed 07/29/2005 Page 88 of 20 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 20

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-2 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 1

Filed 07/29/2005 Page 99 of 20 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 20

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-2 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 1

Filed 07/29/2005 Page 10 of 20 Filed 01/18/2006 Page 10 of 20

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-2 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 1

Filed 07/29/2005 Page 11 of 20 Filed 01/18/2006 Page 11 of 20

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-2 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 1

Filed 07/29/2005 Page 12 of 20 Filed 01/18/2006 Page 12 of 20

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-2 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 1

Filed 07/29/2005 Page 13 of 20 Filed 01/18/2006 Page 13 of 20

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-2 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 1

Filed 07/29/2005 Page 14 of 20 Filed 01/18/2006 Page 14 of 20

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-2 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 1

Filed 07/29/2005 Page 15 of 20 Filed 01/18/2006 Page 15 of 20

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-2 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 1

Filed 07/29/2005 Page 16 of 20 Filed 01/18/2006 Page 16 of 20

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-2 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 1

Filed 07/29/2005 Page 17 of 20 Filed 01/18/2006 Page 17 of 20

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-2 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 1

Filed 07/29/2005 Page 18 of 20 Filed 01/18/2006 Page 18 of 20

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-2 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 1

Filed 07/29/2005 Page 19 of 20 Filed 01/18/2006 Page 19 of 20

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-2 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 1

Filed 07/29/2005 Page 20 of 20 Filed 01/18/2006 Page 20 of 20

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-3 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 2-1

Filed 07/29/2005 Filed 01/18/2006

Page 1 of 1 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) KAROL JUSKIEWICZ ) Plaintiff(s) ) ) C 05-03094 BZ -v) ) ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT INTEL CORPORATION ) CONFERENCE Defendant(s) ) ______________________________) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is assigned to the Honorable Bernard Zimmerman. When serving the complaint or notice of removal, the plaintiff or removing defendant must serve on all other parties a copy of this order, the handbook entitled "Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California," the Notice of Assignment to United States Magistrate Judge for Trial, and all other documents specified in Civil Local Rule 4-2. Counsel must comply with the case schedule listed below unless the Court otherwise orders. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is assigned to the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Multi-Option Program governed by ADR Local Rule 3. Counsel and clients must familiarize themselves with that rule and with the handbook entitled "Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California." CASE SCHEDULE [ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM]

Date Event Governing Rule ------------------------------------------------------------------------07/29/2005 Complaint filed 11/07/2005 Last day to meet and confer re initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan 11/07/2005 Last day to file Joint ADR Certification with Stipulation to ADR process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference 11/21/2005 Last day to complete initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report, file/serve Case Management Statement, and file/serve Rule 26(f) Report 11/28/2005 Case Management Conference in Ctrm G, 15th Floor, SF at 4:00 PM FRCivP 26(f) & ADR LR 3-5 Civil L.R. 16-8

FRCivP 26(a)(1) Civil L.R.16-9

Civil L.R. 16-10

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-4 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 2-2 1

Filed 07/29/2005 Filed 01/18/2006

Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2
(Rev. 01/2002)

STANDING ORDERS 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6. Motions for summary judgment shall be accompanied by a statement of 5. Unless expressly requested by the Court, documents should not be faxed 4. Any proposed order in a case subject to electronic filing shall be sent by 3. A copy of any brief or other document containing a legal citation shall be 2. Civil law and motion is heard on the first and third Wednesdays of every 1. Within 30 days of filing a complaint, plaintiff shall serve and file either a

written consent to Magistrate Judge Zimmerman's jurisdiction or a written request for reassignment to a district judge. Within 30 days of being served with a complaint or third party complaint, a defendant or third party defendant shall serve and file either a written consent to Magistrate Judge Zimmerman's jurisdiction or a written request for reassignment to a district judge.

month at 10:00 a.m. Criminal law and motion is heard on the second and fourth Wednesdays of every month at 1:30 p.m.

submitted to chambers on a diskette formatted preferably in WordPerfect 5, 6, 8 or 9. A chambers copy of any document may be submitted on CD-ROM with hypertext links to exhibits.

e-mail to: [email protected]. This address is to be used only for proposed orders unless otherwise directed by the court.

to chambers but should be filed or lodged in accordance with the Local Rules of Court. The Court should not be routinely copied on correspondence between counsel.

the material facts not in dispute supported by citations to admissible evidence. The

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-4 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 2-2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: January 17, 2002 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7.

Filed 07/29/2005 Filed 01/18/2006

Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2

parties shall file a joint statement of undisputed facts where possible. If the parties are unable to reach complete agreement after meeting and conferring, they shall file a joint statement of the undisputed facts about which they do agree. Any party may then file a separate statement of the additional facts that the party contends are undisputed. A party who without substantial justification contends that a fact is in dispute is subject to sanctions.

Parties are reminded that most procedural questions are answered in the

Local Rules or these Standing Orders. Parties should not contact Chambers for answers to procedural questions. The Local Rules are available for public viewing at the Court's internet site - http://www.cand.uscourts.gov.

BERNARD ZIMMERMAN United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-5 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 3

Filed 08/04/2005 Page 11 of 1 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\MISC\JUSKIEWICZ RECUSAL.ORD.wpd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KAROL JUSKIEWICZ Plaintiff(s), v. INTEL CORPORTION, Defendant(s).

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. C05-3094 BZ NOTICE OF RECUSAL

I hereby recuse myself in the above action. Dated: August 4, 2005

Bernard Zimmerman United States Magistrate Judge

25 26 27 28 1

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-6 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 4

Filed 08/05/2005 Page 11 of 2 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94102

_____________

www.cand.uscourts.gov Richard W. Wieking Clerk General Court Number 415.522.2000

August 5, 2005 CASE NUMBER: CV 05-03094 BZ CASE TITLE: KAROL JUSKIEWICZ-v-INTEL CORPORATION REASSIGNMENT ORDER GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned to the San Francisco division. Honorable SAMUEL CONTI for all further proceedings. Counsel are instructed that all future filings shall bear the initials SC immediately after the case number.

ALL MATTERS PRESENTLY SCHEDULED FOR HEARING ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RENOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THE CASE HAS BEEN REASSIGNED.
Date: 8/5/05 FOR THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE:

________________________________ Clerk

NEW CASE FILE CLERK: Copies to: Courtroom Deputies Log Book Noted Special Projects Entered in Computer 8/5/05AS

CASE SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATOR: Copies to: All Counsel

Transferor CSA

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-6 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 4

Filed 08/05/2005 Page 22 of 2 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-7 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 5

Filed 08/05/2005 Page 11 of 1 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. INTEL CORPORATION Defendant. / KAROL JUSKIEWICZ Plaintiff, No. C-05-3094-SC ORDER OF RECUSAL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: I, the undersigned judge of the court, finding myself disqualified in the above-entitled action,

15 hereby recuse myself from this case and request that the case be reassigned pursuant to the 16 provisions of General Order 44 paragraph E.2 of the Assignment Plan. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 8/5/05 SAMUEL CONTI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE All pending dates of motions, pretrial conferences and trial are hereby vacated and will be reset by the newly assigned judge. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-8 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 6

Filed 08/08/2005 Page 11 of 2 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94102

_____________

www.cand.uscourts.gov Richard W. Wieking Clerk General Court Number 415.522.2000

August 8, 2005 CASE NUMBER: CV 05-03094 SC CASE TITLE: KAROL JUSKIEWICZ-v-INTEL CORPORATION REASSIGNMENT ORDER GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned to the SAN FRANCISCO division. Honorable MAXINE M. CHESNEY for all further proceedings. Counsel are instructed that all future filings shall bear the initials MMC immediately after the case number.

ALL MATTERS PRESENTLY SCHEDULED FOR HEARING ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RENOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THE CASE HAS BEEN REASSIGNED.
Date: 8/8/05 FOR THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE:

________________________________ Clerk

NEW CASE FILE CLERK: Copies to: Courtroom Deputies Log Book Noted Special Projects Entered in Computer 8/8/05HA

CASE SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATOR: Copies to: All Counsel

Transferor CSA

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-8 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 6

Filed 08/08/2005 Page 22 of 2 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-9 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 7

Filed 08/08/2005 Page 11 of 1 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 KAROL JUSKIEWICZ, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant. / No. C 05-03094 MMC ORDER OF RECUSAL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

I, the undersigned Judge of the Court, finding myself disqualified in the aboveentitled action, hereby recuse myself from this case and request that the case be reassigned pursuant to the provisions of the Assignment Plan. All pending dates of motions, pretrial conferences and trial are hereby vacated and are to be reset by the newly assigned Judge. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 8, 2005 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-10 Filed 08/11/2005 Page 1 1 of 2 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 8 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94102

_____________

www.cand.uscourts.gov Richard W. Wieking Clerk General Court Number 415.522.2000

August 11, 2005 CASE NUMBER: CV 05-03094 MMC CASE TITLE: KAROL JUSKIEWICZ-v-INTEL CORPORATION REASSIGNMENT ORDER GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned to the SAN FRANCISCO division. Honorable JEFFREY S. WHITE for all further proceedings. Counsel are instructed that all future filings shall bear the initials JSW immediately after the case number.

ALL MATTERS PRESENTLY SCHEDULED FOR HEARING ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RENOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THE CASE HAS BEEN REASSIGNED.
Date: 8/11/05 FOR THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE:

________________________________ Clerk

NEW CASE FILE CLERK: Copies to: Courtroom Deputies Log Book Noted Special Projects Entered in Computer 8/11/05HA

CASE SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATOR: Copies to: All Counsel

Transferor CSA

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-10 Filed 08/11/2005 Page 2 2 of 2 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 8 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-11 Filed 08/15/2005 Page 1 1 of 4 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 9 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 4

1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 7 8 9 10 11 v. INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant. / KAROL JUSKIEWICZ, Plaintiff, No. C 05-03094 JSW ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

12
For the N orthern D istrict of C alifornia

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: The above matter having been reassigned to the Honorable Jeffrey S. White, it is hereby ordered that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and Civil L. R. 16-10, a Case Management Conference shall be held in this case on November 18, 2005, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. The parties shall appear through lead counsel to discuss all items referred to in this Order and with authority to enter stipulations, to make admissions, and to agree to further scheduling dates. The parties shall file a joint case management statement and proposed order no later than five (5) court days prior to the conference. If any party is proceeding without counsel, separate statements may be filed by each party. Any request to reschedule the date of the conference shall be made in writing, and by stipulation if possible, at least ten (10) calendar days before the date of the conference and must be based upon good cause. Lead counsel shall meet and confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) prior to the Case Management Conference with respect to those subjects set forth below. The statements shall not exceed twelve (12) pages in length and shall address the following items in the following order:

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-11 Filed 08/15/2005 Page 2 2 of 4 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 9 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

1.

A brief description of the basis for this Court's subject-matter jurisdiction, whether any issue exists regarding personal jurisdiction or venue, and whether any parties remain to be served;

2.

A brief description of the case and defenses, the several key factual events underlying the action, and a brief description of any related proceeding, including any administrative proceedings;

3.

A brief description of the legal issues genuinely in dispute, including whether there are any dispositive or partially dispositive issues appropriate for decision by motion or by agreement;

4.

A brief description of the procedural history of the matter, including a list of all pending motions and their current status;

United States District Court

12
For the N orthern D istrict of C alifornia

5.

A brief description of the scope of discovery to date, including whether there has been a full and timely compliance with the initial disclosure requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26;

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 9. 8. 7. 6.

A formal, agreed-upon plan of the discovery each party intends to pursue, including, but not limited to, based upon the nature of the case, the scope and duration of the discovery and whether the parties can limit discovery in any manner, such as using phased discovery to or limiting the scope of initial discovery matters, as well as a list of key witnesses who the parties deem essential to prove their claims or defenses, and the information each party deems essential to obtain from the other party to prove their claims or defenses; A brief description of the motions each party intends to pursue before trial, the extent to which new parties will be added or existing parties deleted, and the extent to which evidentiary, claim-construction or class certification hearings are anticipated; A brief description of the relief sought, including the method by which damages are computed; ADR efforts to date and a specific ADR plan for the case, whether the parties have complied with Civil L. R. 16-8(b) regarding ADR certification, and the prospects for 2

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-11 Filed 08/15/2005 Page 3 3 of 4 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 9 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12. 13. 11. 10.

settlement including whether either party wishes to have a settlement conference with another judge or magistrate; Whether all parties will consent to assignment of the case to a magistrate judge to conduct all further proceedings including trial; Proposed deadlines and court dates, including a discovery cut-off, hearing dispositive motions, pretrial conference and trial date, the anticipated length of trial, the approximate number of witnesses, experts and exhibits, whether the case will be tried by jury or to the Court, whether it is feasible to bifurcate issues for trial or reduce the length of the trial by stipulation, use of summaries or statements, or other expedited means of presenting evidence; A current service list for all counsel, including telephone and facsimile numbers; To the extent not specifically addressed above, all other items set forth in Civil L. R. 16-10. 14. In order to assist the Court in evaluating any need for disqualification or recusal, the parties shall disclose to the Court the identities of any person, associations, firms, partnerships, corporations or other entities known by the parties to have either (1) financial interest in the subject matter at issue or in a party to the proceeding; or (2) any other kind of interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding. If disclosure of non-party interested entities or persons has already been made as required by Civil L. R. 3-16, the parties may simply reference the pleading or document in which the disclosure was made. In this regard, counsel are referred to the Court's Recusal Order posted on the Court website at the Judges Information link at www.cand.uscourts.gov. IT IS SO ORDERED.

United States District Court

12
For the N orthern D istrict of C alifornia

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: August 12, 2005 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-11 Filed 08/15/2005 Page 4 4 of 4 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 9 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

United States District Court

12
For the N orthern D istrict of C alifornia

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-12 Case 3:05-cv-03197-MHP Document 10-1

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/18/2006

Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-12 Case 3:05-cv-03197-MHP Document 10-1

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/18/2006

Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2

3:05-cv-03094-JSW Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-13 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 10 11

Filed 08/17/2005 Page 1 1 of 3 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 3 08/18/2005

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Bingham McCutchen LLP DAVID M. BALABANIAN (SBN 37368) CHRISTOPHER B. HOCKETT (SBN 121539) JOY K. FUYUNO (SBN 193890) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 Facsimile: (415) 393-2286 Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

KAROL JUSKIEWICZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant.

No. C-05-3094-BZ JSW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE FILING DATE FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

IT IS STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL AS FOLLOWS: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Karol Juskiewicz and Defendant Intel Corporation hereby stipulate that Intel Corporation's response to Plaintiff's complaint shall be due either 60 days after transfer of the above captioned case pursuant to any motion to coordinate or consolidate pre-trial proceedings per 28 U.S.C. Section 1407 or, in the alternative, 45 days after any such motion has been denied. The parties request this extension of time to answer or otherwise respond because the plaintiffs in Brauch, et al. v. Intel Corp., No. C 05-2743 (BZ)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATE
SF/21630890.1

3:05-cv-03094-JSW Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-13 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 10 11

Filed 08/17/2005 Page 2 2 of 3 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 3 08/18/2005

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

(N.D. Cal., filed July 5, 2005), a related matter, have filed a petition to coordinate or consolidate pre-trial proceedings per 28 U.S.C. Section 1407, and the above-styled action has been identified as a related action to that petition. As a result the outcome of the pending petition will impact significantly the schedule of this case. This is the first stipulation between the parties. Because this litigation has just begun, granting such a stipulation will not have any negative impact on the schedule of this case. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED. DATED: August 11, 2005 Bingham McCutchen LLP

By:

/s/ Joy K. Fuyuno JOY K. FUYUNO Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

DATED: August 16, 2005 Trump, Alioto, Trump and Prescott

By:

/s/ Mario N. Alioto MARIO N. ALIOTO Attorneys for Plaintiff Karol Juskiewicz

2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATE
SF/21630890.1

3:05-cv-03094-JSW Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-13 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 10 11

Filed 08/17/2005 Page 3 3 of 3 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 3 08/18/2005

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATE
SF/21630890.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE DATE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Intel Corporation's response to Plaintiff's complaint shall be due either 60 days after transfer of the above captioned case pursuant to any motion to coordinate or consolidate pre-trial proceedings per 28 U.S.C. Section 1407, or, in the alternative, 45 days after any such motion has been denied. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August18 2005 ___, _________________________ Honorable Bernard Zimmerman United States Magistrate Judge
Honorable Jeffrey S. White United States District Court Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-14 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 12

Filed 08/26/2005 Page 11 of 2 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP DAVID M. BALABANIAN (SBN 37368) CHRISTOPHER B. HOCKETT (SBN 121539) JOY K. FUYUNO (SBN 193890) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

KAROL JUSKIEWICZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant.

No. 05-3094 DEFENDANT INTEL CORPORATION'S FED. R. CIV. PROC. 7.1 AND CIVIL L.R. 3-16 DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

SF/21633125.1

DEFENDANT'S FED. RULE CIV. PROC. 7.1 AND CIVIL L.R. 3-16 DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-14 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 12

Filed 08/26/2005 Page 22 of 2 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
SF/21633125.1

Pursuant to Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the undersigned certifies that there is no parent company and no publicly held entity that owns 10% or more of Intel. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-16, the undersigned certifies that as of this date, other than the named parties, there is no such interest to report. DATED: August 26, 2005 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP

By:

/s/ Joy K. Fuyuno Joy K. Fuyuno Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

2

DEFENDANT'S FED. RULE. CIV. PROC. 7.1 AND CIVIL L.R. 3-16 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-15 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 13

Filed 10/04/2005 Page 11 of 2 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-15 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 13

Filed 10/04/2005 Page 22 of 2 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-16 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 14

Filed 10/20/2005 Page 11 of 2 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 KAROL JUSKIEWICZ Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION Defendant. NO. CV 05-03094 MHP CLERK'S NOTICE RE: FAILURE TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY AND/OR REGISTER AS AN EFILER / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16

On 7/29/05, counsel for Plaintiff filed a Class Action Complaint manually, on paper. This case has been designated for electronic filing, pursuant to Local Rule 5-4 and General Order 45.

17 18 19 at Section III that cases assigned to judges who participate in the e-filing program "shall be presumptively 20 21 PDF format within 10 days, as an attachment in an e-mail message directed to the judges chamber's "PDF" 22 email box listed at http://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov. (Click on the Judges button and follow the procedure listed 23 24 mentioned filing. All subsequent papers should be e-filed. 25 26 Further, General Order 45 provides at Section IV (A) that "Each attorney of record is obligated to become 27 an ECF User and be assigned a user ID and password for access to the system upon designation of the action 28 there). Do not e-file a document which has been previously filed on paper, as is the case with the above designated" as e-filing cases. Therefore, counsel for Plaintiff should submit the Class Action Complaint, in The above mentioned paper document has been filed and docketed. However, General Order 45 provides

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-16 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 14

Filed 10/20/2005 Page 22 of 2 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

as being subject to ECF." Counsel in this case who have not yet registered as ECF Users must do so immediately. Forms and instructions for registering can be found on the Court's Web site at

ecf.cand.uscourts.gov. Dated: October 20, 2005 Gina Agustine-Rivas Deputy Clerk

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-17 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 15

Filed 10/28/2005 Page 11 of 4 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP DAVID M. BALABANIAN (SBN 37368) CHRISTOPHER B. HOCKETT (SBN 121539) JOY K. FUYUNO (SBN 193890) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 Facsimile: (415) 393-2286 Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

KAROL JUSKIEWICZ, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant.

No. C-05-3094-MHP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES PENDING THE OUTCOME OF THE MOTION TO TRANSFER AND COORDINATE OR CONSOLIDATE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1407

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

WHEREAS, on July 28, 2005, Plaintiff filed the instant action in the Northern District of California ("Juskiewicz Action"); WHEREAS, on or about July 11, 2005, the plaintiffs in Brauch, et al. v. Intel Corp., No. C 05-2743 (BZ) (N. D. Cal., filed July 5, 2005), a related matter, moved before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation ("MDL"), to transfer and coordinate or consolidate for pre-trial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 407 ("MDL Motion"), and the Juskiewicz Action has been identified as a related action subject to that motion;

SF/21642109.1

Case No. C 05-3094 (MHP)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-17 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 15

Filed 10/28/2005 Page 22 of 4 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
SF/21642109.1

WHEREAS, on or about October 4, 2005, Judge Patel issued a Related Case Order relating this case to an earlier filed case assigned to her, and canceling or staying certain but not all dates, events and deadlines in the action; WHEREAS, to date, a decision has not been rendered on the MDL Motion; WHEREAS, the outcome of the MDL Motion will impact significantly the schedule of this case; THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, by and among counsel for Plaintiff Juskiewicz, and counsel for Defendant Intel Corporation, that any events, dates or deadlines set by the Local Rules or Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including the Local Rules for Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR Local Rules") and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26, and any deadlines established in any case management order applicable to this case should be stayed pending the outcome of the aforementioned MDL Motion; and IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by the aforementioned parties that if a case management conference is rescheduled by the Court, the parties shall adjust the dates for any conference, disclosures or reports required by the Local Rules or Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including the ADR Local Rules and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26 accordingly. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED. Dated: October 28, 2005 TRUMP, ALIOTO, TRUMP & PRESCOTT By: /s/ Mario N. Alioto Mario N. Alioto Attorneys for Plaintiff Karol Juskiewicz

2

Case No. C 05-3094 (MHP)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-17 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 15

Filed 10/28/2005 Page 33 of 4 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 4

1 2

Dated: October 28, 2005

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP By: /s/ Joy K. Fuyuno Joy K. Fuyuno Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
SF/21642109.1

3

Case No. C 05-3094 (MHP)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-17 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 15

Filed 10/28/2005 Page 44 of 4 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES PENDING THE OUTCOME OF THE MDL MOTION Any events, dates or deadlines set by the Local Rules or Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including the Local Rules for Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR Local Rules") and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26, and any deadlines established in any case management order applicable to this case are hereby stayed pending the outcome of the motion to transfer and coordinate or consolidate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 ("MDL Motion"). Upon the determination of the MDL Motion, if it is necessary for the Court to reschedule a case management conference, the parties shall adjust the dates for any conference, disclosures or reports required by the ADR Local Rules and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26 accordingly. The parties shall notify the Clerk of Court within 10 days of the decision on the MDL Motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: Honorable Marilyn H. Patel United States District Court Judge

SF/21642109.1

Case No. C 05-3094 (MHP)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-18 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 16

Filed 11/01/2005 Page 11 of 4 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-18 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 16

Filed 11/01/2005 Page 22 of 4 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-18 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 16

Filed 11/01/2005 Page 33 of 4 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-18 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 16

Filed 11/01/2005 Page 44 of 4 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-19 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 17-1

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/18/2006

Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-19 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 17-1

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/18/2006

Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-20 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 17-2

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/18/2006

Page 1 of 4 Page 1 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-20 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 17-2

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/18/2006

Page 2 of 4 Page 2 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-20 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 17-2

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/18/2006

Page 3 of 4 Page 3 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-20 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 17-2

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/18/2006

Page 4 of 4 Page 4 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-21 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 18

Filed 01/05/2006 Page 11 of 1 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 1

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-22 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 19

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 11 of 8 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-22 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 19

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 22 of 8 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-22 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 19

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 33 of 8 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-22 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 19

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 44 of 8 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-22 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 19

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 55 of 8 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-22 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 19

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 66 of 8 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-22 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 19

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 77 of 8 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-22 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 19

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 88 of 8 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-23 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 20

Filed 01/11/2006 Page 11 of 2 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94102

_____________

www.cand.uscourts.gov Richard W. Wieking Clerk General Court Number 415.522.2000

January 11, 2006 United States District Court for the District of Delaware Lockbox 18 844 North King Street Boggs Federal Building Wilmington, Delaware 19801 RE: In Re Intel Corporation, Inc., Antitrust Litigation - MDL - 1717 CV 05-2830 MHP 05-894 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2831 MHP 05-895 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2834 MHP 05-896 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2858 MHP 05-897 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2859 MHP 05-898 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2882 MHP 05-899 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2897 MHP 05-900 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2898 MHP 05-901 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2916 MHP 05-902 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2957 MHP 05-903 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3028 MHP 05-904 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3094 MHP 05-905 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3197 MHP 05-906 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3271 MHP 05-907 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3272 MHP 05-908 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3273 MHP 05-909 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3277 MHP 05-910 JJF (D/DE)

Dear Clerk, Pursuant to an order transferring the above captioned cases to your court, transmitted herewith are: (U) (U) (U) Certified copy of docket entries Certified copy of TRANSFERRAL ORDER Original case file documents

(U) Please be advised that the above entitled action was previously designated to the Electronic Case Filing program. You can access electronically filed documents through PACER referencing the Northern District of California case number at https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov Please acknowledge receipt of the above documents on the attached copy of this letter.

Case 1:05-cv-00905-JJF Document 20-23 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 20

Filed 01/11/2006 Page 22 of 2 Filed 01/18/2006 Page of 2

Sincerely, RICHARD W. WIEKING, Clerk

by: Gina Agustine-Rivas Case Systems Administrator Enclosures Copies to counsel of record