Free Case Transferred In - District Transfer - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF

Document 16

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 4

ADRMOP, CLOSED, E-Filing, RELATE, STAYED

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:05-cv-03272-MHP

Dressed to Kill Custom Draperies LLC v. Intel Corporation Assigned to: Hon. Marilyn H. Patel Cause: 15:15 Antitrust Litigation Plaintiff Dressed to Kill Custom Draperies LLC

Date Filed: 08/10/2005 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 410 Anti-Trust Jurisdiction: Federal Question

represented by David Boies Straus & Boies LLP 4041 University Drive Fairfax, VA 22030 703-764-8700 Fax: 703-764-8704 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Donald F. Drummond Drummond & Associates One California Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415-433-2261 Fax: 415-438-9819 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Ian Otto Straus & Boies LLP 4041 University Drive 5th Floor Fairfax, VA 22030 703-764-8700 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Timothy D. Battin Straus & Boies LLP 4041 University Dr. 5th Floor Fairfax, VA 22030 703-764-8700 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF

Document 16

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 4

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED V. Defendant Intel Corporation represented by Christopher B. Hockett Bingham McCutchen LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 415-393-2000 Fax: 415-393-2286 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Joy K. Fuyuno Bingham McCutchen LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 415-393-2000 Fax: 415-393-2286 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed 08/10/2005

#

Docket Text 1 COMPLAINT /issued summons against Intel Corporation ( Filing fee $ 250, receipt number 3375364.). Filed byDressed to Kill Custom Draperies LLC. (ga, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2005) Additional attachment(s) added on 8/22/2005 (ga, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 08/12/2005) 2 ADR SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Statement due by 12/7/2005. Case Management Conference set for 12/14/2005 10:30 AM.. Signed by Judge James Larson on 8/10/05. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order)(ga, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2005) (Entered: 08/12/2005) CASE DESIGNATED for Electronic Filing. (ga, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2005) (Entered: 08/12/2005) 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Intel Corporation. (Hockett, Christopher) (Filed on 9/12/2005) (Entered: 09/12/2005) 4 Statement of Facts DEFENDANT'S FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 7.1 AND CIVIL LOCAL RULE 3-16 DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS filed byIntel Corporation. (Hockett, Christopher) (Filed on 9/12/2005) (Entered: 09/12/2005) 5 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME. Signed by Judge

08/10/2005

08/10/2005 09/12/2005

09/12/2005

09/13/2005

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF

Document 16

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 3 of 4

James Larson on 9/13/05. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2005) (Entered: 09/13/2005) 09/29/2005 6 ORDER RELATING CASES 05-3271 EMC, C 05-3272 JL, C 05-3273 EMC, AND C 05-3277 EDL to C 05-2669 MHP; Case reassigned to Judge Marilyn H. Patel for all further proceedings; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 9/26/2005(awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2005) (Entered: 09/29/2005) 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint filed by Intel Corporation. (Hockett, Christopher) (Filed on 10/3/2005) (Entered: 10/03/2005) 8 Declaration of Richard A. Ripley in Support of 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint filed byIntel Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C) (Related document(s)7) (Hockett, Christopher) (Filed on 10/3/2005) (Entered: 10/03/2005) 9 Proposed Order re 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint by Intel Corporation. (Hockett, Christopher) (Filed on 10/3/2005) (Entered: 10/03/2005) 10 ORDER by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel granting 7 defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2005) (Entered: 10/05/2005) 11 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES PENDING THE OUTCOME OF THE MOTION TO TRANSFER AND COORDINATE OR CONSOLIDATE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1407 by Intel Corporation. (Fuyuno, Joy) (Filed on 11/1/2005) (Entered: 11/01/2005) 12 STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING CASE pending MDL determination; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 11/7/2005. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2005) (Entered: 11/08/2005) 13 Letter from Joy K. Fuyuno re MDL Transfer Order of November 8, 2005. (Attachments: # 1 MDL Transfer Order)(Fuyuno, Joy) (Filed on 11/17/2005) (Entered: 11/17/2005) 14 ORDER STATISTICALLY DISMISSING CASE pending MDL determination; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 1/5/2006. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2006) (Entered: 01/05/2006) 15 ORDER of Transfer by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to transfer case to USDC for the District of Delaware (In Re Intel Corporation, Inc., Antitrust Litigation - MDL - 1717). (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2006) (Entered: 01/11/2006) 16 Certified copy of transfer order, docket sheet along with the original case file sent to USDC for the District of Delaware (MDL - 1717). (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2006) (Entered: 01/11/2006)

10/03/2005

10/03/2005

10/03/2005

10/05/2005

11/01/2005

11/08/2005

11/17/2005

01/05/2006

01/10/2006

01/11/2006

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF

Document 16

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 4 of 4

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
01/18/2006 09:33:17 PACER Login: ud0037 Description: Billable Pages: 2 Client Code: Cost: 0.16 Docket Report Search Criteria: 3:05-cv-03272-MHP

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 11 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 22 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 33 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 44 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 55 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 66 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 77 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 88 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 99 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 10 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 10 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 11 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 11 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 12 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 12 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 13 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 13 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 14 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 14 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 15 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 15 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 16 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 16 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 17 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 17 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 18 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 18 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 19 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 19 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 20 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 20 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 21 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 21 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 22 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 22 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-2 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 23 of 23 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 23 of 23

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-3 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 2-1

Filed 08/10/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 1 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) DRESSED TO KILL CUSTOM ) Plaintiff(s) ) ) C 05-03272 JL -v) ) ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT INTEL CORPORATION ) CONFERENCE Defendant(s) ) ______________________________) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is assigned to the Honorable James Larson. When serving the complaint or notice of removal, the plaintiff or removing defendant must serve on all other parties a copy of this order, the handbook entitled "Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California," the Notice of Assignment to United States Magistrate Judge for Trial, and all other documents specified in Civil Local Rule 4-2. Counsel must comply with the case schedule listed below unless the Court otherwise orders. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is assigned to the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Multi-Option Program governed by ADR Local Rule 3. Counsel and clients must familiarize themselves with that rule and with the handbook entitled "Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California." CASE SCHEDULE [ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM]

Date Event Governing Rule ------------------------------------------------------------------------08/10/2005 Complaint filed 11/23/2005 Last day to meet and confer re initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan 11/23/2005 Last day to file Joint ADR Certification with Stipulation to ADR process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference 12/07/2005 Last day to complete initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report, file/serve Case Management Statement, and file/serve Rule 26(f) Report 12/14/2005 Case Management Conference in Ctrm F,15th Floor,SF at 10:30 AM FRCivP 26(f) & ADR LR 3-5 Civil L.R. 16-8

FRCivP 26(a)(1) Civil L.R.16-9

Civil L.R. 16-10

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-4 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 2-2

Filed 08/10/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 3 Page 1 of 3

Magistrate Judge James Larson San Francisco Courtroom F, 15th Floor (415) 522-2112 James Larson, Magistrate Judge Wings Hom, Courtroom Deputy (415) 522-2046 Venice Thomas, Secretary (415) 522-2112 Kathleen Campbell, Career Law Clerk

NOTICES 1. Civil Law & Motion is heard on Wednesdays at 9:30 a.m. Counsel need not reserve a hearing date for civil matters, but should confirm the judge's availability in the legal newspapers and on the district court web site, www.cand.uscourts.gov. 2. Criminal motions are scheduled with the courtroom deputy for any Thursday morning at 9:30 a.m. when the judge is available. Motions are governed by the Federal Rules and the Civil and Criminal Local Rules. 3. Status and Case Management Conferences are heard on Wednesdays at 10:30 a.m. 4. Pretrial Conferences are heard Wednesdays at 11:00 a.m. 5. The Magistrate Judge's Settlement Conference Order is also available on the Court web site or from the Clerk's Office. 6. Parties with questions regarding scheduling of settlement conferences should contact Judge Larson's secretary, Venice Thomas, at (415) 522-2112. All other scheduling questions should be addressed to Judge Larson's courtroom deputy, Wings Hom, at (415) 522-2046.

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-4 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 2-2

Filed 08/10/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 3 Page 2 of 3

7. Discovery disputes in cases referred by the district court are handled in one of three ways: a. Motions noticed for a hearing before the district court and then referred to this court will be re-scheduled on Magistrate Judge Larson's Law and Motion calendar. Parties will be notified in writing. b. In disputes which arise after the case has been referred, but before a motion has been filed before the district judge, the parties shall follow the following procedure: Parties shall meet and confer in person, or, if counsel are located outside the Bay Area, by telephone, to attempt to resolve their dispute informally. A mere exchange of letters, telephone calls, or facsimile transmissions does not satisfy the requirement to meet and confer. If, after a good faith effort, the parties have not resolved their dispute, they shall prepare a concise joint statement without affidavits or exhibits, stating the nature and status of their dispute. If a joint statement is not possible, each side may submit a brief individual statement. The Court will advise the parties regarding the need, if any, for formal briefing or a hearing. Law and motion matters, including discovery motions, shall be filed in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-2. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-2(a), any papers filed in connection with any motion referred to Magistrate Judge Larson by a district judge must be filed in the Clerk's Office at the division where the chambers of the district judge is located, whether Oakland, San Francisco or San Jose. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-2(b), the courtesy copies of papers filed in connection with any motion assigned to Magistrate Judge Larson, including those in cases where the assigned district judge sits in Oakland, or San Jose, must be delivered to the Clerk's Office or to Magistrate Judge Larson's chambers, at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco. Any party seeking an award of attorney fees or other expenses as sanctions in connection with a discovery dispute shall file a separate motion as required by Civil Local Rule 37-1(e). c. Telephone conferences in discovery disputes are not encouraged but will be arranged at the court's discretion and are usually reserved for questions arising in the course of a deposition or other emergency. d. In cases referred to Magistrate Judge Larson for discovery, if a party wishes to file a document under seal, that party shall first file a written request for a sealing order setting forth the good cause and accompanied by a proposed order, as provided by Civil Local Rule 79-5.

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-4 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 2-2

Filed 08/10/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 3 of 3 Page 3 of 3

8. In all "E-Filing" cases when filing papers in connection with any motion for determination by the judge, the parties shall, in addition to filing papers electronically, lodge with chambers a printed copy of the papers by the close of the next court day following the day the papers are filed electronically. These printed copies shall be marked "Chambers Copy" and shall be submitted to the Clerk's Office, in an envelope clearly marked with the judge's name, case number and "E-Filing Chambers Copy." Parties shall not file a paper copy of any document with the Clerk's Office that has already been filed electronically.

9. Any proposed order in a case subject to electronic filing shall be e-filed. 10. Motions for summary judgment in cases assigned to Magistrate Judge Larson for trial shall be accompanied by a statement of the material facts not in dispute supported by citations to admissible evidence. The parties shall file a joint statement of undisputed facts wherever possible. If the parties are unable to reach complete agreement after meeting and conferring, they shall file a joint statement of the undisputed facts about which they do agree. Any party may then file a separate statement of the additional facts which the party contends are undisputed.

K:\lotus\domino\data\CAND\docs\Judges\jl\standingord-2004amended.wpd

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-5 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 3

Filed 09/12/2005 Page 11 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP DAVID M. BALABANIAN (SBN 37368) CHRISTOPHER B. HOCKETT (SBN 121539) JOY K. FUYUNO (SBN 193890) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DRESSED TO KILL CUSTOM DRAPERIES, LLC, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

No. C-05-3272 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

IT IS STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL AS FOLLOWS: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Dressed To Kill Custom Draperies, LLC and Defendant Intel Corporation hereby stipulate that Intel Corporation's response to Plaintiff's complaint be extended 30 days, up to and including October 12, 2005. This is the first stipulation between the parties. Because this litigation has just begun, granting such a stipulation will not have any negative impact on the schedule of this case. /// ///

Case No. C-05-3272

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
SF/21635210.1

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-5 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 3

Filed 09/12/2005 Page 22 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2

DATED: September 12, 2005 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
SF/21635210.1

By:

/s/ Joy K. Fuyuno Joy K. Fuyuno Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

DATED: September 12, 2005 DRUMMOND & ASSOCIATES

By:

/s/ Donald F. Drummond Donald F. Drummond Attorneys for Plaintiff Dressed To Kill Custom Draperies, LLC

Case No. C-05-3272

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-5 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 3

Filed 09/12/2005 Page 33 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6

[Proposed] Order to Extend Response Time IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Intel Corporation shall have up to and including October 12, 2005 to respond to Plaintiff Dressed To Kill Custom Draperies, LLC's complaint. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September ____, 2005

7 _____________________________ 8 United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
SF/21635210.1

Case No. C-05-3272

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-6 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 4

Filed 09/12/2005 Page 11 of 2 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP DAVID M. BALABANIAN (SBN 37368) CHRISTOPHER B. HOCKETT (SBN 121539) JOY K. FUYUNO (SBN 193890) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DRESSED TO KILL CUSTOM DRAPERIES, LLC, and all others similarly sitauted, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

No. C-05-3272 DEFENDANT'S FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 7.1 AND CIVIL LOCAL RULE 3-16 DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Pursuant to Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the undersigned certifies that there is no parent company and no publicly held entity that owns 10% or more of Intel. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-16, the undersigned certifies that as of this date, other than the named parties, there is no such interest to report. /// /// /// /// ///
Case No. C-05-3272

DEFENDANT'S FRCP 7.1 AND CIVIL L.R. 3-16 DISCLOSURES
SF/21635229.1

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-6 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 4

Filed 09/12/2005 Page 22 of 2 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

1 2

DATED: September 12, 2005 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
DEFENDANT'S FRCP 7.1 AND CIVIL L.R. 3-16 DISCLOSURES
SF/21635229.1

By:

/s/ Joy K. Fuyuno Joy K. Fuyuno Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

Case No. C-05-3272

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-7 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 5

Filed 09/13/2005 Page 11 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP DAVID M. BALABANIAN (SBN 37368) CHRISTOPHER B. HOCKETT (SBN 121539) JOY K. FUYUNO (SBN 193890) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DRESSED TO KILL CUSTOM DRAPERIES, LLC, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

No. C-05-3272 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] XXXXXXXX ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

IT IS STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL AS FOLLOWS: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Dressed To Kill Custom Draperies, LLC and Defendant Intel Corporation hereby stipulate that Intel Corporation's response to Plaintiff's complaint be extended 30 days, up to and including October 12, 2005. This is the first stipulation between the parties. Because this litigation has just begun, granting such a stipulation will not have any negative impact on the schedule of this case. /// ///

Case No. C-05-3272

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
SF/21635210.1

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-7 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 5

Filed 09/13/2005 Page 22 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2

DATED: September 12, 2005 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
SF/21635210.1

By:

/s/ Joy K. Fuyuno Joy K. Fuyuno Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

DATED: September 12, 2005 DRUMMOND & ASSOCIATES

By:

/s/ Donald F. Drummond Donald F. Drummond Attorneys for Plaintiff Dressed To Kill Custom Draperies, LLC

Case No. C-05-3272

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-7 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 5

Filed 09/13/2005 Page 33 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

[Proposed] Order to Extend Response Time IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Intel Corporation shall have up to and including October 12, 2005 to respond to Plaintiff Dressed To Kill Custom Draperies, LLC's complaint. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
SF/21635210.1

Case No. C-05-3272

A

C

LI

FO

m Judge Ja

es Larso

n

R NIA

DERED _____________________________ SO OR IT IS United States District Judge
UNIT ED

UNIT ED

13 Dated: September ____, 2005

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA
S

RT U O

S DISTRICT TE C TA

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

Judge James

Larson

R NIA

IT IS SO

ORDERED

RT U O

NO

RT

H

NO

RT
H

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-8 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 6

Filed 09/29/2005 Page 11 of 2 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-8 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 6

Filed 09/29/2005 Page 22 of 2 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-9 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 7

Filed 10/03/2005 Page 11 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-9 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 7

Filed 10/03/2005 Page 22 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-9 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 7

Filed 10/03/2005 Page 33 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-9 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 7

Filed 10/03/2005 Page 44 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-9 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 7

Filed 10/03/2005 Page 55 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-10 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-1

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 11of 44 Page of

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-10 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-1

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 22of 44 Page of

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-10 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-1

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 33of 44 Page of

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-10 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-1

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 44of 44 Page of

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 11of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 22of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 33of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 44of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 55of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 66of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 77of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 88of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 99of 11 Page of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 10 of 11 Page 10 of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-11 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 11 of 11 Page 11 of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 11of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 22of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 33of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 44of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 55of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 66of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 77of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 88of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 99of 17 Page of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 10 of 17 Page 10 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 11 of 17 Page 11 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 12 of 17 Page 12 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 13 of 17 Page 13 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 14 of 17 Page 14 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 15 of 17 Page 15 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 16 of 17 Page 16 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-12 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 17 of 17 Page 17 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-13 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-4

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 11of 33 Page of

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-13 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-4

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 22of 33 Page of

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-13 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 8-4

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 33of 33 Page of

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-14 Filed 10/03/2005 Page 1 1 of 1 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 9 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 1

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-15 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 10

Filed 10/05/2005 Page 11 of 1 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 1

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-16 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 11

Filed 11/01/2005 Page 11 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP DAVID M. BALABANIAN (SBN 37368) CHRISTOPHER B. HOCKETT (SBN 121539) JOY K. FUYUNO (SBN 193890) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 Facsimile: (415) 393-2286 Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DRESSED TO KILL DRAPERIES, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant.

No. C-05-3272-MHP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES PENDING THE OUTCOME OF THE MOTION TO TRANSFER AND COORDINATE OR CONSOLIDATE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1407

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

WHEREAS, on August 10, 2005, Plaintiff filed the instant action in the Northern District of California ("Dressed to Kill Action"); WHEREAS, on or about July 11, 2005, the plaintiffs in Brauch, et al. v. Intel Corp., No. C 05-2743 (BZ) (N. D. Cal., filed July 5, 2005), a related matter, moved before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation ("MDL"), to transfer and coordinate or consolidate for pre-trial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 407 ("MDL Motion"), and the Dressed to Kill Action has been identified as a related action subject to that motion;

SF/21642117.1

Case No. C 05-3272 (MHP)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-16 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 11

Filed 11/01/2005 Page 22 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
SF/21642117.1

WHEREAS, on or about September 29, 2005, Judge Patel issued a Related Case Order relating this case to an earlier filed case assigned to her, and canceling or staying certain but not all dates, events and deadlines in the action; WHEREAS, to date, a decision has not been rendered on the MDL Motion; WHEREAS, the outcome of the MDL Motion will impact significantly the schedule of this case; THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, by and among counsel for Plaintiff Dressed to Kill, and counsel for Defendant Intel Corporation, that any events, dates or deadlines set by the Local Rules or Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including the Local Rules for Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR Local Rules") and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26, and any deadlines established in any case management order applicable to this case should be stayed pending the outcome of the aforementioned MDL Motion; and IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by the aforementioned parties that if a case management conference is rescheduled by the Court, the parties shall adjust the dates for any conference, disclosures or reports required by the Local Rules or Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including the ADR Local Rules and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26 accordingly. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED. Dated: November 1, 2005 DRUMMOND & ASSOCIATES By: /s/ Donald F. Drummond Donald F. Drummond Attorneys for Plaintiff Dressed to Kill Draperies, LLC

2

Case No. C 05-3272 (MHP)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-16 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 11

Filed 11/01/2005 Page 33 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Dated: November 1, 2005

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP By: /s/ Joy K. Fuyuno Joy K. Fuyuno Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES PENDING THE OUTCOME OF THE MDL MOTION Any events, dates or deadlines set by the Local Rules or Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including the Local Rules for Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR Local Rules") and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26, and any deadlines established in any case management order applicable to this case are hereby stayed pending the outcome of the motion to transfer and coordinate or consolidate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 ("MDL Motion"). Upon the determination of the MDL Motion, if it is necessary for the Court to reschedule a case management conference, the parties shall adjust the dates for any conference, disclosures or reports required by the ADR Local Rules and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26 accordingly. The parties shall notify the Clerk of Court within 10 days of the decision on the MDL Motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: Honorable Marilyn H. Patel United States District Court Judge

SF/21642117.1

3

Case No. C 05-3272 (MHP)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-17 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 12

Filed 11/08/2005 Page 11 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-17 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 12

Filed 11/08/2005 Page 22 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-17 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 12

Filed 11/08/2005 Page 33 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-18 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 13-1

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-18 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 13-1

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-19 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 13-2

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 4 Page 1 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-19 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 13-2

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 4 Page 2 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-19 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 13-2

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 3 of 4 Page 3 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-19 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 13-2

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 4 of 4 Page 4 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-20 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 14

Filed 01/05/2006 Page 11 of 1 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 1

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 11 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 22 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 33 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 44 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 55 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 66 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 77 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-21 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 15

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 88 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-22 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 16

Filed 01/11/2006 Page 11 of 2 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94102

_____________

www.cand.uscourts.gov Richard W. Wieking Clerk General Court Number 415.522.2000

January 11, 2006 United States District Court for the District of Delaware Lockbox 18 844 North King Street Boggs Federal Building Wilmington, Delaware 19801 RE: In Re Intel Corporation, Inc., Antitrust Litigation - MDL - 1717 CV 05-2830 MHP 05-894 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2831 MHP 05-895 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2834 MHP 05-896 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2858 MHP 05-897 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2859 MHP 05-898 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2882 MHP 05-899 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2897 MHP 05-900 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2898 MHP 05-901 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2916 MHP 05-902 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2957 MHP 05-903 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3028 MHP 05-904 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3094 MHP 05-905 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3197 MHP 05-906 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3271 MHP 05-907 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3272 MHP 05-908 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3273 MHP 05-909 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3277 MHP 05-910 JJF (D/DE)

Dear Clerk, Pursuant to an order transferring the above captioned cases to your court, transmitted herewith are: (U) (U) (U) Certified copy of docket entries Certified copy of TRANSFERRAL ORDER Original case file documents

(U) Please be advised that the above entitled action was previously designated to the Electronic Case Filing program. You can access electronically filed documents through PACER referencing the Northern District of California case number at https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov Please acknowledge receipt of the above documents on the attached copy of this letter.

Case 1:05-cv-00908-JJF Document 16-22 Case 3:05-cv-03272-MHP Document 16

Filed 01/11/2006 Page 22 of 2 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

Sincerely, RICHARD W. WIEKING, Clerk

by: Gina Agustine-Rivas Case Systems Administrator Enclosures Copies to counsel of record