Free Case Transferred In - District Transfer - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

CAND-ECF - Docket Report Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF

Document 19

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 4 Page 1 of 4

ADRMOP, CLOSED, E-Filing, RELATE, STAYED

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:05-cv-03273-MHP

Kinder v. Intel Corporation Assigned to: Hon. Marilyn H. Patel Demand: $5,000,000 Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle Plaintiff Tracy Kinder

Date Filed: 08/10/2005 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 410 Anti-Trust Jurisdiction: Federal Question

represented by David Boies Straus & Boies, LLP 4041 University Drive Fairfax, VA 22030 703-764-8700 Fax: 703-764-8704 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Donald F. Drummond Drummond & Associates One California Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415-433-2261 Fax: 415-438-9819 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Ian Otto Straus & Boies LLP 4041 University Drive 5th Floor Fairfax, VA 22030 703-764-8700 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Timothy D. Battin Straus & Boies LLP 4041 University Dr. 5th Floor Fairfax, VA 22030 703-764-8700 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY

https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?462110913659608-L_280_0-1

1/18/2006

CAND-ECF - Docket Report Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF

Document 19

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 4 Page 2 of 4

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED V. Defendant Intel Corporation a Delaware corporation represented by Christopher B. Hockett Bingham McCutchen LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 415-393-2000 Fax: 415-393-2286 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Joy K. Fuyuno Bingham McCutchen LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 415-393-2000 Fax: 415-393-2286 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed 08/10/2005

#

Docket Text 1 COMPLAINT-Antitrust, 28 USC 1332(d), Jury Demand, Summons Issued against defendant Intel Corporation ( Filing fee $ 250, receipt number 3375363.). Filed byTracy Kinder. (db, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2005) Additional attachment(s) added on 8/19/2005 (aaa, Court Staff). (Entered: 08/11/2005) 2 ADR SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Statement due by 11/14/2005. Case Management Conference set for 11/18/2005 10:30 AM.. Signed by Judge Chesney on 8/10/05. (db, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2005) Additional attachment(s) added on 8/11/2005 (db, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 08/11/2005) CASE DESIGNATED for Electronic Filing. (db, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2005) (Entered: 08/11/2005) 3 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Maxine M. Chesney for all further proceedings. Judge Samuel Conti no longer assigned to case. Signed by Executive Committee. (db, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2005) Additional attachment(s) added on 8/11/2005 (db, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 08/11/2005) 4 ORDER OF RECUSAL signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 12, 2005. Judge Maxine M. Chesney recused. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2005) (Entered: 08/12/2005)

08/10/2005

08/10/2005 08/10/2005

08/12/2005

https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?462110913659608-L_280_0-1

1/18/2006

CAND-ECF - Docket Report Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF

Document 19

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 3 of 4 Page 3 of 4

08/18/2005

5 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong for all further proceedings. Judge Maxine M. Chesney no longer assigned to case. Signed by EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE on 8/18/05. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2005) (Entered: 08/18/2005) 6 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASES: Case Management Conference set for 12/1/2005 02:45 P.M., via telephone. Signed by Judge Armstrong on 8/26/05. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2005) Modified on 8/29/2005 (jlm, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 08/26/2005) 7 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Intel Corporation. (Hockett, Christopher) (Filed on 9/12/2005) (Entered: 09/12/2005) 8 Statement of Facts DEFENDANT'S FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 7.1 AND CIVIL LOCAL RULE 3-16 DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS filed byIntel Corporation. (Hockett, Christopher) (Filed on 9/12/2005) (Entered: 09/12/2005) 9 ORDER RELATING CASES C 05-3271 EMC, C 05-3272 JL, C 053273 EMC, AND C 05-3277 EDL to C 05-2669 MHP; Case reassigned to Judge Marilyn H. Patel for all further proceedings; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 9/26/2005(awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2005) (Entered: 09/29/2005) 10 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, filed by Intel Corporation. (Hockett, Christopher) (Filed on 10/3/2005) (Entered: 10/03/2005) 11 Declaration of Richard A. Ripley in Support of 10 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, filed byIntel Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C) (Related document(s)10) (Hockett, Christopher) (Filed on 10/3/2005) (Entered: 10/03/2005) 12 Proposed Order re 10 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, by Intel Corporation. (Hockett, Christopher) (Filed on 10/3/2005) (Entered: 10/03/2005) 13 ORDER by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel granting 10 defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2005) (Entered: 10/05/2005) 14 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES PENDING THE OUTCOME OF THE MOTION TO TRANSFER AND COORDINATE OR CONSOLIDATE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1407 by Intel Corporation. (Fuyuno, Joy) (Filed on 11/1/2005) (Entered: 11/01/2005) 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING CASE pending MDL

08/26/2005

09/12/2005

09/12/2005

09/29/2005

10/03/2005

10/03/2005

10/03/2005

10/05/2005

11/01/2005

11/08/2005

https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?462110913659608-L_280_0-1

1/18/2006

CAND-ECF - Docket Report Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF

Document 19

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 4 of 4 Page 4 of 4

determination; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 11/7/2005. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2005) (Entered: 11/08/2005) 11/17/2005 16 Letter from Joy K. Fuyuno re MDL Transfer Order of November 8, 2005. (Attachments: # 1 MDL Transfer Order)(Fuyuno, Joy) (Filed on 11/17/2005) (Entered: 11/17/2005) 17 ORDER STATISTICALLY DISMISSING CASE pending MDL determination; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 1/5/2006. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2006) (Entered: 01/05/2006) 18 ORDER of Transfer by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to transfer case to USDC for the District of Delaware (In Re Intel Corporation, Inc., Antitrust Litigation - MDL - 1717). (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2006) (Entered: 01/11/2006) 19 Certified copy of transfer order, docket sheet along with the original case file sent to USDC for the District of Delaware (MDL - 1717). (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2006) (Entered: 01/11/2006)

01/05/2006

01/10/2006

01/11/2006

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
01/18/2006 09:11:16 PACER Login: ud0037 Description: Billable Pages: 2 Client Code: Cost: 0.16 Docket Report Search Criteria: 3:05-cv-03273-MHP

https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?462110913659608-L_280_0-1

1/18/2006

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 11 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 22 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 33 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 44 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 55 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 66 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 77 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 88 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 99 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 10 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 10 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 11 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 11 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 12 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 12 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 13 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 13 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 14 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 14 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 15 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 15 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 16 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 16 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 17 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 17 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 18 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 18 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 19 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 19 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 20 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 20 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 21 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 21 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 22 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 22 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 23 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 23 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 1

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 24 of 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 24 of 24

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-3 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 2-1

Filed 08/10/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 1 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) TRACY KINDER ) Plaintiff(s) ) ) C 05-03273 MMC -v) ) ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT INTEL CORPORATION ) CONFERENCE Defendant(s) ) ______________________________) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is assigned to the Honorable Maxine M. Chesney. When serving the complaint or notice of removal, the plaintiff or removing defendant must serve on all other parties a copy of this order, the handbook entitled "Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California" and all other documents specified in Civil Local Rule 4-2. Counsel must comply with the case schedule listed below unless the Court otherwise orders. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is assigned to the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Multi-Option Program governed by ADR Local Rule 3. Counsel and clients must familiarize themselves with that rule and with the handbook entitled "Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California." CASE SCHEDULE [ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM]

Date Event Governing Rule ------------------------------------------------------------------------08/10/2005 Complaint filed 10/28/2005 Last day to meet and confer re initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan 10/28/2005 Last day to file Joint ADR Certification with Stipulation to ADR process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference 11/14/2005 Last day to complete initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report, file/serve Case Management Statement, and file/serve Rule 26(f) Report 11/18/2005 Case Management Conference in Ctrm 7, 19th Floor at 10:30 AM FRCivP 26(f) & ADR LR 3-5 Civil L.R. 16-8

FRCivP 26(a)(1) Civil L.R.16-9

Civil L.R. 16-10

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-4 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 2-2

Filed 08/10/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 3 Page 1 of 3

STANDING ORDERS

1.

Counsel shall consult and comply with all provisions of the Local Rules relating to continuance, motions, briefs, and all other matters, unless superseded by these Standing Orders. In all cases that have been assigned to the Electronic Case Filing Program, the parties are required to provide for use in chambers one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically. The paper copy of each such document shall be delivered no later than noon on the day after the document is filed electronically. The paper copy shall be marked "Chambers Copy" and shall be delivered to the Clerk's Office in an envelope clearly marked with the judge's name, case number, and "E-Filing Chambers Copy." Scheduling Days: a. b. c. d. e. Criminal Law and Motion Calendar is conducted on Wednesdays at 2:30 p.m. Civil Law and Motion Calendar is conducted on Fridays at 9:00 a.m. Case Management Conferences are conducted on Fridays at 10:30 a.m., with order of call determined by the Court. Pretrial conferences are generally conducted on Tuesday afternoons at 3:00 p.m. Counsel need not reserve a hearing date for motions, but noticed dates may be reset as the Court's calendar requires.

2.

3.

4.

Proposed Orders Required: Each party filing or opposing a motion shall also serve and file a proposed order which sets forth the relief or action sought and a short statement of the rationale of decision, including citation of authority, that the party requests the Court to adopt. Citation to Authorities: Citation to authorities shall comply with Civil L.R. 3-4(d) and, in particular, any citation to a U.S. Supreme Court case shall be to both the U.S. Reports and the Supreme Court Reporter and citation to a California state court case shall be to both the official reporter and to the West California Reporter. Discovery: Motions to compel discovery will be referred to a Magistrate Judge and shall be noticed for hearing before the assigned Magistrate Judge. Procedural Matters: Parties seeking to continue hearings, request special status conferences, modify briefing schedules, or make other procedural changes shall submit a signed stipulation and proposed order, or, if stipulation is not possible, an administrative request in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-10(b). In either case, no changes in the Court's schedule shall be made except by signed order of the Court and only upon a showing of good cause.

5.

6.

7.

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-4 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 2-2 8.

Filed 08/10/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 3 Page 2 of 3

Service of Standing Orders: Plaintiff is directed to serve copies of these standing orders at once upon all parties to this action and upon those subsequently joined, in accordance with the provisions of Rules 4 and 5, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and to file with the Clerk of the Court a certificate reflecting such service.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 23, 2002

____________________________________ Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-4 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 2-2

Filed 08/10/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 3 of 3 Page 3 of 3

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-5 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 3

Filed 08/10/2005 Page 11 of 1 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 1

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-6 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 4

Filed 08/12/2005 Page 11 of 1 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 TRACY KINDER, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. / No. C 05-03273 MMC ORDER OF RECUSAL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16

I, the undersigned Judge of the Court, finding myself disqualified in the above17 entitled action, hereby recuse myself from this case and request that the case be reassigned 18 pursuant to the provisions of the Assignment Plan. 19 All pending dates of motions, pretrial conferences and trial are hereby vacated 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 12, 2005 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge and are to be reset by the newly assigned Judge. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-7 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 5

Filed 08/18/2005 Page 11 of 2 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94102

_____________

www.cand.uscourts.gov Richard W. Wieking Clerk General Court Number 415.522.2000

August 18, 2005 CASE NUMBER: CV 05-03273 MMC CASE TITLE: TRACY KINDER -v-INTEL CORPORATION REASSIGNMENT ORDER GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned to the OAKLAND division. Honorable SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG for all further proceedings. Counsel are instructed that all future filings shall bear the initials SBA immediately after the case number.

ALL MATTERS PRESENTLY SCHEDULED FOR HEARING ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RENOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THE CASE HAS BEEN REASSIGNED.
Date: 8/18/05 FOR THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE:

________________________________ Clerk

NEW CASE FILE CLERK: Copies to: Courtroom Deputies Log Book Noted Special Projects Entered in Computer 8/18/05HA

CASE SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATOR: Copies to: All Counsel

Transferor CSA

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-7 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 5

Filed 08/18/2005 Page 22 of 2 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-8 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 6

Filed 08/26/2005 Page 11 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 TRACY KINDER, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

No. C 05-03273 SBA CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASES

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

This action having been reassigned to the Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong, IT IS ORDERED that this action is assigned to the Case Management Program and shall be governed by Civil L.R. 16-2. The dates listed in the Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference remain in effect except that the initial Case Management Conference is rescheduled for December 1, 2005, at 2:45 p.m., via telephone. Plaintiff's counsel is to set up the conference call with all the parties on the line and call chambers at (510) 637-3559. (NO PARTY SHALL CONTACT CHAMBERS DIRECTLY WITHOUT PRIOR AUTHORIZATION OF THE COURT.) Plaintiff(s) is directed to serve a copy of this Order at once on all parties to this action in accordance with the provisions of Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Following service, the party causing the service shall file a certificate of service with the Clerk of Court.

Dated: 8/26/05

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge

To:

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-8 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 6

Filed 08/26/2005 Page 22 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

In addition to the requirements set forth in the Civil L.R. 16-10, counsel are expected to comply with the following: A. Filing Case Management Statements

Counsel are expected to comply with this Standing Order concerning the joint filing of the Case Management Statement. In preparing the Case Management Statement, the parties shall use the format enclosed herewith. Note that no party may submit a separate Case Management Statement. Disagreements among parties with respect to any of the matters contained in the Case Management Statement shall be set forth in the appropriate sections. Counsel are further expected to file a Case Management Statement at least ten (10) days before each and every scheduled Case Management Conference conducted in this action. If there is no change in the status of the case from the time the last statement was filed, counsel shall indicate as such in a pleading and attach a copy of the most recently filed Case Management Statement to the pleading. Failure to timely file a Case Management Statement may result in sanctions. B. Appearance At The Case Management Conference

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Each party shall be represented at the Case Management Conference by Counsel prepared to address all of the matters referred to in this and the Civil L.R. 16-10 (b), and with authority to enter into stipulations and make admissions pursuant to this and Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(a) and (c). Representatives of the parties may, but are not required to, attend. Unless otherwise specified, all Case Management Conferences shall take place via telephone. Plaintiff or his/her counsel is responsible for setting up the conference call. Plaintiff or his/her counsel will be notified of the date and time of the telephone conference call by Clerk's Notice shortly after the case is filed. Any request to reschedule the above dates shall be made in compliance with Civil L.R. 16-2(e) and must be made at least ten days prior to the date sought to be modified. Counsel shall not contact the chambers of Judge Armstrong regarding requests to modify provisions of this Standing Order; all requests must be submitted in writing and served on all parties to the action. The parties should be prepared to address and resolve at the Case Management Conference the following: Setting the date and the estimated length of the trial; Setting the date for discovery and motion cutoff; Setting the date to designate experts and other witnesses; Setting the date for the pretrial Conference. Other matters which the Court will take up at the Case Management Conference, in addition to those specified in the Joint Case Management Statement and Proposed Order Form, will include the following: 1. Jurisdiction: Does this Court have subject matter jurisdiction over all of the plaintiff's claim(s) and defendant's counter-claim(s)? What is the bases of that jurisdiction? Are all the parties subject to the Court's jurisdiction? Do any parties remain to be served? 2. Substance of the Action: What are the factual and legal bases for plaintiff's claims, defendant's defenses, defendant's counter-claims and plaintiff's defenses to the counterclaims? 3. dispute? Identification of Issues: What are the factual and legal issues genuinely in

4. Narrowing of Issues: What are the issues that can be narrowed by agreement or by motions? Are there dispositive or partially dispositive issues appropriate for a decision by 2

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-8 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 6

Filed 08/26/2005 Page 33 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

motion? 5. Motions: What are the motion(s) anticipated by the parties?

6. Relief: What relief does the plaintiff seek? What are the amount of damages sought by plaintiff's claim(s)? What are the amount of damages sought by defendant's counterclaim(s)? How are the damages computed? 7. Discovery: What discovery does each party intend to pursue? Can discovery be limited in any manner? Are there any alternative methods available to obtain the necessary information? Should a discovery order and conference be entered pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)? 8. Alternative Means of Disposition: Is the case suitable for reference to binding arbitration, to a master, or to a magistrate for trial? Is the case suitable for reference to the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation? 9. Pretrial Conference and Trial Setting: Will this case be tried by a jury? What is the anticipated length of trial? Is it possible to reduce the length of the trial by stipulation, use of summaries or statements, or other expedited means of presenting evidence? Is it feasible and desirable to bifurcate issues for trial? 10. Related Cases: Are there any related cases pending before the judges of this Court? See Civil L.R. 3-12. 11. Cut-Off Dates: When are the earliest reasonable dates for discovery cutoff, motion cutoff, pretrial conference and trial? 12. Settlement: What are the prospects for settlement? Does any party wish to have a settlement conference with a magistrate? How can settlement efforts be assisted? See ADR L.R. 7-3. 13. Other Matters: Such other matters as any party considers conducive to the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(a) and (c). C. Law and Motion Matters

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Law and Motion matters will be heard on Tuesdays at 1:00 p.m., in Courtroom 3 of the United States Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, 3rd Floor, Oakland, California. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1, 7-2 and 7-3, all civil motions shall be noticed for a hearing not less than thirtyfive (35) calendar days after service. The opposition and supporting papers shall be filed not less than twenty-one (21) days before the noticed hearing date. The reply shall be filed not less than fourteen (14) days before the hearing date. Each party filing or opposing a motion shall also serve and file a proposed order which sets forth the relief sought and a short statement of the rationale of decision including citation of authority, that the party requests the Court to adopt. All parties shall meet and confer before filing any motions before this Court. Note that pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-1(b), the Court may, in its discretion, adjudicate motions without oral argument. Opening and opposition briefs exceeding twenty-five (25) pages and reply briefs exceeding fifteen (15) pages may be filed only with leave of the Court seven (7) days before the filing date of the motion. See Civil L.R. 7-4(b).

3

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-8 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 6

Filed 08/26/2005 Page 44 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Any pleading or brief sought to be filed with the Court after the required time, or in an improper manner or form, shall not be received or considered by the Court. Any attorney in violation of such requirements will be subject to other sanctions. Civil L.R. 1-4. The failure of the opposing party to file a memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion. The parties are not required to file a statement of undisputed facts in connection with a motion for summary judgment. However, if the parties desire to file a statement of undisputed facts, only one joint statement of undisputed facts signed by all parties shall be filed. All separate statements will be stricken. If the parties are unable to agree that a fact is undisputed, they should assume that fact is in dispute. The parties need not reserve hearing dates. However, the parties are advised to check the court's calendar at www.cand.uscourts.gov for the next available hearing date. Matter's are calendared on a first come first serve basis. You MUST submit a hard copy of all motion papers filed in E-FILED cases in order to be placed on calendar!! Failure to comply with this Order or the Local Rules of this Court may result in sanctions. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Civil L.R. 1-4. Dated: 8/26/05

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge

4

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-8 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 6

Filed 08/26/2005 Page 55 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 JUDGE ARMSTRONG'S STANDING ORDERS 1. Counsel are expected to consult and comply with all provisions of the Local Rules of Court relating to continuances, motions and all other matters. 2. Civil Law & Motion will be held at 1:00 p.m., on Tuesdays. Criminal Law & Motion will be held at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesdays. Civil matters shall not be noticed for hearing on a Tuesday following an official court holiday that falls on a Monday. 3. The parties need not reserve a hearing date. However, the parties are advised to check the court's calendar at www.cand.uscourts.gov for the next available hearing date. Matter's are calendared on a first come first serve basis. You MUST submit a hard copy of all motion papers filed in E-FILED cases in order to be placed on calendar!! 4. Before appearing for a matter before this Court all parties shall check the court's calendar at www.cand.uscourts.gov to confirm that their matters are still on calendar. 5. Meet and Confer Requirement; All parties are expected to meet and confer before filing any motion before this court. 6. Summary judgment/ adjudication: The parties are not required to file statements of undisputed facts in connection with a motion for summary judgment. However, if the parties desire to file a statement of undisputed facts, only one joint statement of undisputed facts signed by all parties shall be filed. All separate statements will be stricken. If the parties are unable to agree that a fact is undisputed, they should assume that fact is in dispute. 7. Proposed orders: Each party filing or opposing a motion shall also serve and file a proposed order which sets forth the relief of action which includes that the party requests the Court to adopt, a short statement of the rationale of decision including citation to authority. 8. The failure of the opposing party to file a memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion. 9. Criminal Law & Motion will be held at 9:00 a.m., on Tuesdays. Prior to a plea being entered in a criminal case, a copy of the plea agreement must be submitted to chambers no later then the Friday before the plea is to be taken. All persons pleading guilty must complete an application for permission to enter plea of guilty, which is available on the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. 10. In All "E-Filing" Cases Effective Immediately, when filing papers in connection with any motion or case management conference, the parties shall, in addition to filing papers electronically, lodge with the Clerk's Office a printed copy of the papers by the close of business the following day the papers are filed electronically. These printed copies shall be marked "Chambers Copy" and shall be submitted to the Clerk's Office, in an envelope clearly marked with the judge's name, case number and "E-Filing Chambers Copy." Parties shall not file a paper copy of any other document with the Clerk's Office that has already been filed electronically. You MUST submit a hard copy of all motion papers filed in E-FILED cases in order to be placed on calendar!!

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

5

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-9 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 7

Filed 09/12/2005 Page 11 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP DAVID M. BALABANIAN (SBN 37368) CHRISTOPHER B. HOCKETT (SBN 121539) JOY K. FUYUNO (SBN 193890) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRACY KINDER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

No. C-05-3273 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

IT IS STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL AS FOLLOWS: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Tracy Kinder and Defendant Intel Corporation hereby stipulate that Intel Corporation's response to Plaintiff's complaint be extended 30 days, up to and including October 12, 2005. This is the first stipulation between the parties. Because this litigation has just begun, granting such a stipulation will not have any negative impact on the schedule of this case. /// /// ///
Case No. C-05-3273

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
SF/21635211.1

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-9 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 7

Filed 09/12/2005 Page 22 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2

DATED: September 12, 2005 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
SF/21635211.1

By:

/s/ Joy K. Fuyuno Joy K. Fuyuno Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

DATED: September 12, 2005 DRUMMOND & ASSOCIATES

By:

/s/ Donald F. Drummond Donald F. Drummond Attorneys for Plaintiff Tracy Kinder

Case No. C-05-3273

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-9 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 7

Filed 09/12/2005 Page 33 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5

[Proposed] Order to Extend Response Time IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Intel Corporation shall have up to and including October 12, 2005 to respond to Plaintiff Tracy Kinder's complaint. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September ____, 2005

6 _____________________________ 7 United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
SF/21635211.1

Case No. C-05-3273

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-10 Filed 09/12/2005 Page 1 1 of 2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP DAVID M. BALABANIAN (SBN 37368) CHRISTOPHER B. HOCKETT (SBN 121539) JOY K. FUYUNO (SBN 193890) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

TRACY KINDER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

No. C-05-3273 DEFENDANT'S FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 7.1 AND CIVIL LOCAL RULE 3-16 DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Pursuant to Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the undersigned certifies that there is no parent company and no publicly held entity that owns 10% or more of Intel. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-16, the undersigned certifies that as of this date, other than the named parties, there is no such interest to report. /// /// /// /// ///
Case No. C-05-3273

DEFENDANT'S FRCP 7.1 AND CIVIL L.R. 3-16 DISCLOSURES
SF/21635230.1

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-10 Filed 09/12/2005 Page 2 2 of 2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

1 2

DATED: September 12, 2005 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
DEFENDANT'S FRCP 7.1 AND CIVIL L.R. 3-16 DISCLOSURES
SF/21635230.1

By:

/s/ Joy K. Fuyuno Joy K. Fuyuno Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

Case No. C-05-3273

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-11 Filed 09/29/2005 Page 1 1 of 2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 9 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-11 Filed 09/29/2005 Page 2 2 of 2 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 9 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-12 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 10

Filed 10/03/2005 Page 11 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-12 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 10

Filed 10/03/2005 Page 22 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-12 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 10

Filed 10/03/2005 Page 33 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-12 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 10

Filed 10/03/2005 Page 44 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-12 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 10

Filed 10/03/2005 Page 55 of 5 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 5

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-13 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-1

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 4 Page 1 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-13 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-1

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 4 Page 2 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-13 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-1

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 3 of 4 Page 3 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-13 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-1

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 4 of 4 Page 4 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-14 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 11 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-14 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 11 Page 2 of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-14 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 3 of 11 Page 3 of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-14 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 4 of 11 Page 4 of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-14 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 5 of 11 Page 5 of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-14 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 6 of 11 Page 6 of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-14 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 7 of 11 Page 7 of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-14 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 8 of 11 Page 8 of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-14 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 9 of 11 Page 9 of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-14 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 10 of 11 Page 10 of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-14 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-2

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 11 of 11 Page 11 of 11

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-15 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 17 Page 1 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-15 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 17 Page 2 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-15 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 3 of 17 Page 3 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-15 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 4 of 17 Page 4 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-15 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 5 of 17 Page 5 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-15 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 6 of 17 Page 6 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-15 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 7 of 17 Page 7 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-15 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 8 of 17 Page 8 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-15 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 9 of 17 Page 9 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-15 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 10 of 17 Page 10 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-15 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 11 of 17 Page 11 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-15 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 12 of 17 Page 12 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-15 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 13 of 17 Page 13 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-15 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 14 of 17 Page 14 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-15 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 15 of 17 Page 15 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-15 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 16 of 17 Page 16 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-15 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-3

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 17 of 17 Page 17 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-16 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-4

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 3 Page 1 of 3

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-16 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-4

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 3 Page 2 of 3

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-16 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 11-4

Filed 10/03/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 3 of 3 Page 3 of 3

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-17 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 12

Filed 10/03/2005 Page 11 of 1 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 1

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-18 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 12 13

Filed 10/03/2005 Page 11 of 1 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 1 10/05/2005

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

arily Judge M

n H. Pa

tel

R NIA

RT U O

NO

RT

H

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-19 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 14

Filed 11/01/2005 Page 11 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP DAVID M. BALABANIAN (SBN 37368) CHRISTOPHER B. HOCKETT (SBN 121539) JOY K. FUYUNO (SBN 193890) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 Facsimile: (415) 393-2286 Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

TRACY KINDER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant.

No. C-05-3273-MHP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES PENDING THE OUTCOME OF THE MOTION TO TRANSFER AND COORDINATE OR CONSOLIDATE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1407

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

WHEREAS, on August 10, 2005, Plaintiff filed the instant action in the Northern District of California ("Kinder Action"); WHEREAS, on or about July 11, 2005, the plaintiffs in Brauch, et al. v. Intel Corp., No. C 05-2743 (BZ) (N. D. Cal., filed July 5, 2005), a related matter, moved before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation ("MDL"), to transfer and coordinate or consolidate for pre-trial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 407 ("MDL Motion"), and the Kinder Action has been identified as a related action subject to that motion;

SF/21642118.1

Case No. C 05-3273 (MHP)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-19 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 14

Filed 11/01/2005 Page 22 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
SF/21642118.1

WHEREAS, on or about September 29, 2005, Judge Patel issued a Related Case Order relating this case to an earlier filed case assigned to her, and canceling or staying certain but not all dates, events and deadlines in the action; WHEREAS, to date, a decision has not been rendered on the MDL Motion; WHEREAS, the outcome of the MDL Motion will impact significantly the schedule of this case; THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, by and among counsel for Plaintiff Kinder, and counsel for Defendant Intel Corporation, that any events, dates or deadlines set by the Local Rules or Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including the Local Rules for Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR Local Rules") and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26, and any deadlines established in any case management order applicable to this case should be stayed pending the outcome of the aforementioned MDL Motion; and IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by the aforementioned parties that if a case management conference is rescheduled by the Court, the parties shall adjust the dates for any conference, disclosures or reports required by the Local Rules or Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including the ADR Local Rules and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26 accordingly. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED. Dated: November 1, 2005 DRUMMOND & ASSOCIATES By: /s/ Donald F. Drummond Donald F. Drummond Attorneys for Plaintiff Tracy Kinder

2

Case No. C 05-3273 (MHP)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-19 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 14

Filed 11/01/2005 Page 33 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Dated: November 1, 2005

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP By: _________/s/ Joy K. Fuyuno____ Joy K. Fuyuno Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES PENDING THE OUTCOME OF THE MDL MOTION Any events, dates or deadlines set by the Local Rules or Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including the Local Rules for Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR Local Rules") and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26, and any deadlines established in any case management order applicable to this case are hereby stayed pending the outcome of the motion to transfer and coordinate or consolidate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 ("MDL Motion"). Upon the determination of the MDL Motion, if it is necessary for the Court to reschedule a case management conference, the parties shall adjust the dates for any conference, disclosures or reports required by the ADR Local Rules and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26 accordingly. The parties shall notify the Clerk of Court within 10 days of the decision on the MDL Motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: Honorable Marilyn H. Patel United States District Court Judge

SF/21642118.1

3

Case No. C 05-3273 (MHP)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DATES, EVENTS AND DEADLINES

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-20 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 15

Filed 11/08/2005 Page 11 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-20 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 15

Filed 11/08/2005 Page 22 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-20 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 15

Filed 11/08/2005 Page 33 of 3 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 3

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-21 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 16-1

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-21 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 16-1

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-22 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 16-2

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 4 Page 1 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-22 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 16-2

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 4 Page 2 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-22 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 16-2

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 3 of 4 Page 3 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-22 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 16-2

Filed 11/17/2005 Filed 01/17/2006

Page 4 of 4 Page 4 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-23 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 17

Filed 01/05/2006 Page 11 of 1 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 1

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-24 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 18

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 11 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-24 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 18

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 22 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-24 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 18

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 33 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-24 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 18

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 44 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-24 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 18

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 55 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-24 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 18

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 66 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-24 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 18

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 77 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-24 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 18

Filed 01/10/2006 Page 88 of 8 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 8

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-25 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 19

Filed 01/11/2006 Page 11 of 2 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94102

_____________

www.cand.uscourts.gov Richard W. Wieking Clerk General Court Number 415.522.2000

January 11, 2006 United States District Court for the District of Delaware Lockbox 18 844 North King Street Boggs Federal Building Wilmington, Delaware 19801 RE: In Re Intel Corporation, Inc., Antitrust Litigation - MDL - 1717 CV 05-2830 MHP 05-894 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2831 MHP 05-895 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2834 MHP 05-896 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2858 MHP 05-897 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2859 MHP 05-898 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2882 MHP 05-899 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2897 MHP 05-900 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2898 MHP 05-901 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2916 MHP 05-902 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-2957 MHP 05-903 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3028 MHP 05-904 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3094 MHP 05-905 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3197 MHP 05-906 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3271 MHP 05-907 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3272 MHP 05-908 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3273 MHP 05-909 JJF (D/DE) CV 05-3277 MHP 05-910 JJF (D/DE)

Dear Clerk, Pursuant to an order transferring the above captioned cases to your court, transmitted herewith are: (U) (U) (U) Certified copy of docket entries Certified copy of TRANSFERRAL ORDER Original case file documents

(U) Please be advised that the above entitled action was previously designated to the Electronic Case Filing program. You can access electronically filed documents through PACER referencing the Northern District of California case number at https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov Please acknowledge receipt of the above documents on the attached copy of this letter.

Case 1:05-cv-00909-JJF Document 19-25 Case 3:05-cv-03273-MHP Document 19

Filed 01/11/2006 Page 22 of 2 Filed 01/17/2006 Page of 2

Sincerely, RICHARD W. WIEKING, Clerk

by: Gina Agustine-Rivas Case Systems Administrator Enclosures Copies to counsel of record