Free Order on Motion to Compel - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:02-cv—01663—RNC Document 66 Filed 10/12/2004 Page1 0f1 !
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ,m W__
DISTRICT or CONNECTICUT
LETROY HUNDIEY, ; ZW! UCI I2 :3 Lp US
Pisinfiffr E Iii *;$;=3l" z>:w.;;:;g·
v. 5 CASE NO. 3:O2CVl66SlRRClfDEM)
OFFICER PAMELA CHRISTIE, Z
Defendant. Z
ENDORSEMENT RULING
Plaintiff's motion to compel discovery and for sanctions (doc.
#64) is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff is advised that the
Local Rules of Civil Procedure require that before any discovery
motion can be heard by the court, a memoranda shall be filed which
contains "a concise statement of the nature of the case and a
specific verbatim listing of each of the items of discovery sought
or opposed, and immediately following each specification shall set
forth the reason why the item should be allowed or disallowed. . .
. Every 1nemorandum shall include, as exhibits, copies of the
discovery requests in dispute." See Local Rule of Civil Procedure
37(a)(3). Plaintiff may refile the motion in compliance with the
local rules.
SO ORDERED at Hartford, Connectfcgl this R2? day of October,
20041. Il l x
Dbnne F. Maftinek I”___r__Ar7 I
United States Magistrate Judge
1
I
I



"TI ”I""`I S if iiiii