Free Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

7 w§;g;2T5;§§i$} $L§§§SE§;I;£n Q§§¥” ;§Q;” @Z””.£wg§ "$”” #W y
"
Y
UNITED `STATES DZZ5T§i%E@COOP»T
DI svmcw 01* C¤>¤d@z•.»4+¤m`t`5 5:0.,
CASE, }2gg%Ug&1;;;@§T§U‘6|{?é3'tMc` ‘;>rM’ .
LE.THD}’HUNDL1:'Z/ *347%/00 Pz¤s·;‘;%.L,»»6`/° DAT; ’(9fé iUByCU”“ n
F ./5
/°/XMJZL/X CH/’}I5`f`»€, ’0e,Ymc5mV ‘
.
Q i
‘M0}{0n FOB DKCLATOZY BeJ·é.r Am] Monkmy
Q DAMAGES-
PBOSE |>>¢·,S.2;d¥¤\|y r‘20v'E.‘$ T|‘|E_ COURT VOB [Tuégmm}
E Inpqygr O? TI-\EQ P}a,Znjr§W4_¤ QQPM 0{ We. }
* DlZ,@lq_’mr~y |°>e,h.cwO P>e,Qy¢3,5¥. BASED On THE 62000:}.5
THE c0nnu,&Qw ¥ 0.0.6, GP>§e.vmce, PP{O§€<;¤UK—L x
@0125 O0} €,xc,MP1L THe 5).0.; QPOM \Q.c_G¤\:J:y of
§ C}a,'af’). G _ .
G5. ‘}‘/GS":} CJKLLMS TO Dae C}cZ•r*>$ COMf‘1·&mrJ&F
= Only Teh} &Z500 zh Do/ws THE Hbnmjé ckclm @Xce,cc$5
TH15 i£m1\ ikgve, {ov Pf%0rvp\i¤g +\»c clvli Q|¤}M» _ _ q
Xx }~`$T02NE)V G€.00K‘cs.\5 H6;.5 OWL kP€¤$ “°·$ da"`,) A5 C`°:`°°
FJ P\Z,(J\Of}Q@,A VUV |")0OT\'\.5.
Y PJGJMQW P>&5Pc2d$0\\y -ITDViEf.5 THE. COULT T·`0L KuJgnpn’r
l ON M0n ¥c¤?,y DM'}/XGES nun Bzvcz YM THE. Plaldiw As msuzy
gm} EM0Y¤;>m\ DAWMB5 Hm Ifjgeb Aaéweé As 6Jc-JX As LH
l 0,0,; \Q]O_C$¤\]}y E,5¥a<3\}5H€<:]M HIM \
Q "$y~%W{ __ L
L LFLTZO} HU/d>bLl;}’ 277/06 \
¤ (
.3* _ . _. _ _

_ ’ - nD;cgJment57 Fued 04/08/2004 Page20f2
T UNITED STATES DI ST WLCT COQFT 0
Y DI STRICT OF COAINECTICU T a
j Ogg; No ·_·,;0,1cv1&»éfb‘¤·~¤' i>¤*M’ T
] \_—\;·yBDy Hgxgygy $z7*U0é’ R2.o1a.,»>»éJ¤b# T
nfs y
{ PAMLA cmsw ic, *0e.S&nAm\` =
, §,, %y,¢’/~»@/ T
Q 900 H.gl¤I Guzsuxve. 6+. 00*110 T
I H&f€.i’>y O2<*¥\Ty`TT\1\T A COP}! of D
T THE }`c>raG0§ng (QA 3 5e,nT Qy M4.!
To THE. F0}|0¢.J{¤g On TH} 5 DA;/...Q_...
Lynn D. vWHe.0bvXnY>
Assgsm Awmnmzy éenemn
Fédaval GAB M0 CT. 045575
H0 SHERMAN STBEET
g HMT Yard 6%. O6}05
2.,. www
l.,E.TBO/ HU/\IDLJ§}’ .279006
T
T K
1
E ,` \ `