Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

r rirm)4.-»·.A, ¢.-.. ,__,.. 1
Case 3:02-cv-01663-RNC Document 48 Filed 10/31/2003 €P’%g¤|4·4e31‘U$*€*’l‘*1'“<
5 .
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT _ __ (
msrtucr or connncrrcuitllll UU 2*4 l---’ *2* 20 ,
LETROY HUNDLEY : PRISQNERL l .. _ _Q T ` umcd I
; No. 3:02CV1663(RNC)(DFM)
VS. :
CAPTAIN LEEN COMMONO, ET AL OCTOBER 23, 2003 !
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY
1
JUDGMENT AS TO IQQQAUSTION I
l {
\ The sole remaining defendant in the above-captioned matter, Officer Christie,
Q g respectfully moves for an additional thirty days, up to and including November 22, 2003, within
\ which to file her Motion for Summary Judgment as to the exhaustion issue. In support of this
N l
E \ motion, the defendant represents as follows: I C . . . . l
Ji l. The schedule and case volume of the undersigned counsel hasmade more timely
E filing most difficult;
, l
A ,5 · 5 2. The undersigned counsel is in the process of collecting Affidavits nom various
‘ a
G C ‘ witnesses and is nearing completion, although some witnesses have been more difficult to locate
ve
VY] than others; _
Q 3. This is the first motion for an extension of time as to this deadline; and g
E .__ j 4. Due to his incarceration, the defendant has not ascertained the position of the
Q plaintiff with regard to this motion.
LN] vv, Thefdefendant moved for permission to file a Motion for Summary Judgment solely on I
the ilslsue Olliekliraustion of administrative remedies, reserving her right, if unsuccessful on the
llrfmi motion regarding exhaustion, to file a summary judgment motion with regard to the merits of the
M ,,_ plaii5.€iff’s gdaiisge of action. This motion was granted by the Court on August 27, 2003. '
nusmm ‘___
t* — l
no T i
" Lim
E
‘‘‘‘i’i 2
7; ---; _: _ rn -- - N ..____;r_______k_ ` _ _ I } { - -2;-f:t-5:-Â¥;ru un )
ei*» §