Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

. -...-_- ..... .-..._. _ ._..._.......H..I_.....T.---L...t ---T--·J· —-·—-·-—----
I I
Case 3:02-cv—O1663—RNC Document 74 Filed 11/1 •I2004 Page 1 of 1 I
I I
I I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT coun
DISTRICT or CONNECTICUT I §:IIm§§[)
I
. ZUUU
LETROY uumorsy, ; { NUVIU FD b=Uu
’ I II? Bit ¤
pi ‘ t TT, I “:·.RIIICT I
am 1 I I MII-IIII-ԤIRD,%IIURT I
v. I CASE NO.I3:O2CVl663 {smc)
= I
LEEN connomo, ET AL., I
Defendants. I
sNooAssMsNT RULTNG I I
I I
Plaintiff’s "Motion for Request for Adlission under Rule ‘
36(aI" (doc. #70) is denied. Under Rule 36(a) OI the Federal Rules
I
of Civil Procedure, "[a] party may serve uponIany other party a
I
written request for the admission, for purpo·es of the pending
action only, of the truth of any nmtters wiIhin the scope of
[discovery]." Permission from the court to sIrve a request for I
admission is not necessary in this instance. Ilaintiff may serve I
the Request for Admission directly on the defendfnt Pamela Christee
I
in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Irocedure. I
SO ORDERED at Hartford, Connecticut this "F%day of November,
2004. _ I I
I I r
Donna F. Martinel `
United States Maeistrate Judge
I
I I
li7F7FTTT7q iift·t—-—e—~—— ee .» .i Irllll-QQHIHI “I“I"I"l` `l`l`l I `F`F`0‘0 ‘I I·I·
VF°FDDFFTCT*it?fvt·r·~——~—e~———e-».e .--lllI Hill--Inlnl “I"I"I"l"l "l"l"i“I“I III
"TCT"TFT‘iYi’itf q'_·i*i··~t··~e—-e——~e——~e - Y, rl “_, __, I I 2 I I I I I I I l 'I-I" ` l`l`l` ` F‘i‘0‘0 · I ·I·I
"FTF??*ftiffiiii#~—~—-—e—-—e—ei.i_lr__ Y,q“é_“I“g'·I“I"I"I"l"l"l"F“ i“I“ IIII I~I~s