Free Remark - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 19 Page 1 of 19

CLOSED, DISCMAG, JURY, PATENT

U.S. District Court [LIVE] Eastern District of TEXAS LIVE (Marshall) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE

Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Charter Communications, Inc., et al Assigned to: Judge T. John Ward Referred to: Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham Cause: 35:271 Patent Infringement Plaintiff Rembrandt Technologies, LP

Date Filed: 06/01/2006 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 830 Patent Jurisdiction: Federal Question

represented by Robert M Parker Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth, P.C. 100 E Ferguson Suite 1114 Tyler, TX 75702 903/531-3535 Fax: 9035339687 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Samuel Franklin Baxter McKool Smith - Marshall P O Box O Marshall, TX 75671 US 903/927-2111 Fax: 903/927-2622 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Bradley Wayne Caldwell McKool Smith 300 Crescent Court Suite 1500 Dallas, TX 75201 214/978-4000 Fax: 2149784044 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Charles Ainsworth Parker Bunt & Ainsworth 100 E Ferguson Suite 1114

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 2 of 19 Page 2 of 19

Tyler, TX 75702 US 903/531-3535 Fax: 903/533-9687 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Franklin Jones, Jr Jones & Jones - Marshall 201 W Houston St PO Drawer 1249 Marshall, TX 75670 903/938-4395 Fax: 9039383360 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jeffrey A Carter McKool Smith - Dallas 300 Crescent Court Suite 1200 Dallas, TX 75201 214/978-4006 Fax: 12149784044 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED John Franklin Garvish, II McKool Smith - Austin 300 W 6th St Ste 1700 Austin, TX 78701 512/692-8731 Fax: 512/692-8744 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Robert Christopher Bunt Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth, P.C. 100 East Ferguson, Ste. 1114 Tyler, TX 75702 903/531-3535 Fax: 903/533-9687 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Thomas Guy Fasone, III McKool Smith 300 Crescent Court Suite 1500

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 3 of 19 Page 3 of 19

Dallas, TX 75201 214/978-4000 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Travis Gordon White McKool Smith 300 W 6th St Ste 1700 Austin, TX 78701 512/692-8701 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED V. Defendant Charter Communications, Inc., represented by Allen Franklin Gardner Potter Minton PC 110 N College Suite 500 PO Box 359 Tyler, TX 75710-0359 903/597-8311 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Bradford P Lyerla Marshall Gerstein & Borun 233 S Wacker Dr 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606-6357 312/474-6300 Fax: 312/474-0448 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Charles Edward Juister Marshall Gerstein & Borun 233 S Wacker Dr 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606-6357 312/474-6300 Fax: 312/474-0448 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Diane DeVasto Potter Minton

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 4 of 19 Page 4 of 19

110 N. College Street, Suite 500 Tyler, Tx 75702 US 903-597-8311 Fax: 903-593-0846 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Gregory E Stanton Marshall Gerstein & Borun 233 S Wacker Dr 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606-6357 312/474-6300 Fax: 312/474-0448 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jon-Thomas Bloch Marshall Gerstein & Borun 233 S Wacker Dr 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606-6357 312/474-6300 Fax: 312/474-0448 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Kevin D Hogg Marshall Gerstein & Borun 233 S Wacker Dr 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606-6357 312/474-6300 Fax: 317/474-0448 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Margaret Lynn Begalle Marshall Gerstein & Borun 233 S Wacker Dr 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606-6357 312/474-6300 Fax: 312/474-0448 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Paul Bryan Stephens

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 5 of 19 Page 5 of 19

Marshall Gerstein & Borun 233 S Wacker Dr 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606-6357 312/474-6300 Fax: 312/474-0448 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED William Joseph Kramer Marshall Gerstein & Borun 233 S Wacker Dr 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606-6357 312/474-6300 Fax: 312/474-0448 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Defendant Charter Communications Operating, LLC represented by Allen Franklin Gardner (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Bradford P Lyerla (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Charles Edward Juister (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Diane DeVasto (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Gregory E Stanton (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jon-Thomas Bloch (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Kevin D Hogg (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Margaret Lynn Begalle (See above for address)

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 6 of 19 Page 6 of 19

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Paul Bryan Stephens (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED William Joseph Kramer (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Defendant Cox Communications, Inc. TERMINATED: 09/19/2006 represented by Candice C Decaire Kilpatrick Stockton LLP - Atlanta 1100 Peachtree St Ste 2800 Atlanta, GA 30309-4530 404/815-6033 Fax: 404/541-3218 Email: [email protected] Leroy M Toliver Kilpatrick Stockton 1100 Peachtree St Suite 2800 Atlanta, GA 30309 404/815-6483 Fax: 404/541-3274 Email: [email protected] Michael Edwin Jones Potter Minton PC 110 N College Suite 500 PO Box 359 Tyler, TX 75710-0359 903/597/8311 Fax: 9035930846 Email: [email protected] Mitchell G Stockwell Kilpatrick Stockton LLP 1100 Peachtree St Ste 2800 Atlanta, GA 30309-4530 404/815-6214 Fax: 14048156555 Email: [email protected]

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 7 of 19 Page 7 of 19

Defendant Cox Enterprises, Inc,. TERMINATED: 09/19/2006 represented by Candice C Decaire (See above for address) Leroy M Toliver (See above for address) Michael Edwin Jones (See above for address) Mitchell G Stockwell (See above for address) Defendant Coxcom, Inc., represented by Allen Franklin Gardner (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Candice C Decaire (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Diane DeVasto (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Leroy M Toliver (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Michael Edwin Jones (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Mitchell G Stockwell (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Tonya R Deem Kilpatrick Stockton LLP NC 1001 W Fourth Street Winston-Salem, NC 27101 336-607-7485 Fax: 336-607-7500 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Defendant CSC Holdings, Inc.

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 8 of 19 Page 8 of 19

Defendant Cablevision Systems Corporation Defendant All Defendants Movant Coxcom, Inc., Movant Comcast Cable Communications, LLC Movant Comcast Corporation Movant Comcast of Plano, LP Counter Claimant Charter Communications, Inc., represented by Michael Edwin Jones (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Counter Claimant Charter Communications Operating, LLC represented by Michael Edwin Jones (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V. Counter Defendant Rembrandt Technologies, LP Counter Claimant Coxcom, Inc., V. Counter Defendant Rembrandt Technologies, LP Date Filed 06/01/2006 # Docket Text 1 COMPLAINT against Cablevision Systems Corporation, Charter Communications, Inc.,, Charter Communications Operating, LLC, Cox Communications, Inc., Cox Enterprises, Inc,., Coxcom, Inc.,, CSC

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 9 of 19 Page 9 of 19

Holdings, Inc. (Filing fee $ 350.) , filed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ehs, ) (Entered: 06/02/2006) 06/01/2006 06/01/2006 06/02/2006 06/28/2006 07/06/2006 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (ehs, ) (Entered: 06/02/2006) 2 Form mailed to Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks. (ehs, ) (Entered: 06/02/2006) Filing fee: $ 350.00, receipt number 2-1-1540 (ehs, ) (Entered: 06/06/2006) 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Franklin Jones, Jr on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Jones, Franklin) (Entered: 06/28/2006) 4 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (Bunt, Robert) Additional attachment(s) added on 7/7/2006 (mll, ). (Entered: 07/06/2006) 5 ORDER granting 4 Motion to Withdraw Fish & Richardson PC as Attorney. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 7/10/06. (fnt, ) (Entered: 07/11/2006) 16 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Leroy M Toliver for Coxcom, Inc.,; Cox Communications, Inc. and Cox Enterprises, Inc,.. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/07/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Toliver; Fee: $25, receipt number: 6-16091 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/07/2006) Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (ehs, ) (Entered: 09/06/2006) 6 NOTICE of Designation of Attorney in Charge to Samuel Franklin Baxter on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 07/25/2006) 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Travis Gordon White on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (White, Travis) (Entered: 07/25/2006) 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jeffrey A Carter on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Carter, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/25/2006) 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Bradley Wayne Caldwell on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Caldwell, Bradley) (Entered: 07/25/2006) 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John Franklin Garvish, II on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Garvish, John) (Entered: 07/25/2006) 15 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Mitchell G Stockwell for Coxcom, Inc.,; Cox Communications, Inc. and Cox Enterprises, Inc,.. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/07/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Stockwell; Fee: $25, receipt number: 21-1728 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/07/2006)

07/11/2006

07/24/2006

07/24/2006 07/24/2006 07/25/2006

07/25/2006 07/25/2006 07/25/2006

07/25/2006 07/26/2006

07/26/2006

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 10 of 19 Page 10 of 19

08/02/2006

12 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. Cablevision Systems Corporation served on 7/28/2006, answer due 8/17/2006. (ehs, ) (Entered: 08/04/2006) 14 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. Charter Communications Operating, LLC served on 7/28/2006, answer due 8/17/2006. (ehs, ) (Entered: 08/04/2006) 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael Edwin Jones on behalf of Cox Communications, Inc., Cox Enterprises, Inc,., Coxcom, Inc., (Jones, Michael) (Entered: 08/04/2006) 13 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. Charter Communications, Inc., served on 7/28/2006, answer due 8/17/2006. (ehs, ) (Entered: 08/04/2006) 17 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Candice C Decaire for Coxcom, Inc.,; Cox Communications, Inc. and Cox Enterprises, Inc,.. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/10/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Decaire; Fee: $25, receipt number: 2-11763 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/10/2006) 21 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Candice C Decaire for Coxcom, Inc.,; Cox Communications, Inc. and Cox Enterprises, Inc,.APPROVED (poa, ) (Entered: 08/14/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Decaire; Fee: $25, receipt number: 2-11763 (poa, ) (Entered: 08/14/2006) 18 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Returned Executed Certified Mail by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. Cox Communications, Inc. served on 8/2/2006, answer due 8/22/2006. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/10/2006) 19 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Returned Executed Certified Mail by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. Coxcom, Inc., served on 8/2/2006, answer due 8/22/2006. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/10/2006) 20 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Returned Executed Certified Mail by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. CSC Holdings, Inc. served on 7/31/2006, answer due 8/21/2006. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/10/2006) 22 Defendants' Charter Communications, Inc. and Charter Communications Operating LLC ANSWER to Complaint , Affirmative Defenses and, COUNTERCLAIM against Rembrandt Technologies, LP by Charter Communications, Inc.,, Charter Communications Operating, LLC.(Jones, Michael) (Entered: 08/17/2006) 26 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Bradford P Lyerla for Charter Communications, Inc., and Charter Communications Operating, LLC. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/24/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Lyerla; Fee: $25, receipt number: 6-16391 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/24/2006)

08/02/2006

08/04/2006

08/04/2006

08/07/2006

08/07/2006 08/07/2006

08/07/2006 08/09/2006

08/09/2006

08/09/2006

08/17/2006

08/17/2006

08/17/2006

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 11 of 19 Page 11 of 19

08/17/2006

27 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Kevin D Hogg for Charter Communications, Inc., and Charter Communications Operating, LLC. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/24/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Hogg; Fee: $25, receipt number: 6-16391 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/24/2006) 28 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney William Joseph Kramer for Charter Communications, Inc., and Charter Communications Operating, LLC. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/24/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Kramer; Fee: $25, receipt number: 6-16391 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/24/2006) 29 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Paul Bryan Stephens for Charter Communications, Inc., and Charter Communications Operating, LLC. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/24/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Stephens; Fee: $25, receipt number: 6-16391 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/24/2006) 30 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Margaret Lynn Begalle for Charter Communications, Inc., and Charter Communications Operating, LLC. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/25/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Begalle; Fee: $25, receipt number: 6-16391 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/25/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Begalle; Fee: $25, receipt number: 6-16391 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/25/2006) 31 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Gregory E Stanton for Charter Communications, Inc., and Charter Communications Operating, LLC. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/25/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Stanton; Fee: $25, receipt number: 6-16391 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/25/2006) 32 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Charles Edward Juister for Charter Communications, Inc., and Charter Communications Operating, LLC. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/25/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Juister; Fee: $25, receipt number: 6-16391 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/25/2006) 33 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Jon-Thomas Bloch for Charter Communications, Inc., and Charter Communications Operating, LLC. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/25/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Bloch; Fee: $25, receipt number: 6-16391 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/25/2006) 23 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. Cox Enterprises, Inc,. served on 8/8/2006, answer due 8/28/2006. (ehs, ) (Entered: 08/18/2006)

08/17/2006 08/17/2006

08/17/2006 08/17/2006

08/17/2006 08/17/2006

08/17/2006 08/17/2006 08/17/2006

08/17/2006 08/17/2006

08/17/2006 08/17/2006

08/17/2006 08/18/2006

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 12 of 19 Page 12 of 19

08/21/2006

24 ***FILED IN ERROR; PLEASE IGNORE*** MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer /Respond to Rembrandt Technologies, LP's Complaint for Patent Infringement by Cox Communications, Inc., Cox Enterprises, Inc,., Coxcom, Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Agreed Motion to Extension of Time to Respond to Rembrandt Technologies, LP's Complaint for Patent Infringement)(Stockwell, Mitchell) Modified on 8/28/2006 (mpv, ). (Entered: 08/21/2006)

08/21/2006

25 ***FILED IN ERROR; ATTY USED WRONG EVENT TO DOCKET; PLEASE IGNORE*** ***FILED IN ERROR. Document # 24, Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer/Respond to Rembrandt Technologies, LP's Complaint for Patent Infringement. PLEASE IGNORE.*** Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Rembrandt Technologies, LP'S Complaint for Patent Infringement (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Rembrandt Technologies, LP's Complaint for Patent Infringement)(Decaire, Candice) Modified on 8/28/2006 (mpv, ). (Entered: 08/21/2006)

08/21/2006

34 ***REPLACES #24 & #25*** MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer/Respond re 1 Complaint, by Cox Communications, Inc., Cox Enterprises, Inc, Coxcom, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (mpv, ) Modified on 8/28/2006 (mpv, ). (Entered: 08/28/2006)

08/21/2006

***FILED IN ERROR. Document # 24, MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer /Respond to Rembrandt Technologies, LP's Complaint for Patent Infringement. PLEASE IGNORE. REPLACED BY #34*** (mpv, ) (Entered: 08/28/2006)

08/21/2006

***FILED IN ERROR. Document # 25, Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Rembrandt Technologies, LP'S Complaint for Patent Infringement. PLEASE IGNORE. DOCKETED INCORRECTLY BY ATTORNEY AS NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION; REPLACED BY #34*** (mpv, ) (Entered: 08/28/2006)

08/29/2006

35 ORDER granting 34 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Dft's Cox Communications, Inc., Coxcom, Inc., and Cox Enterprises, Inc. Deadline to answer Pla's Complaint is 9/27/06 . Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 8/29/06. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/29/2006) Answer Due Deadline Updated for Cox Communications, Inc. to

08/29/2006

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 13 of 19 Page 13 of 19

9/27/2006; Cox Enterprises, Inc,. to 9/27/2006; Coxcom, Inc., to 9/27/2006. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/29/2006) 09/06/2006 36 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 09/06/2006) 37 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 09/08/2006) 38 *** FILED IN ERROR - PLEASE IGNORE - TO BE REFILED ***ANSWER to Counterclaim, COUNTERCLAIM against Rembrandt Technologies, LP by Rembrandt Technologies, LP.(Baxter, Samuel) Modified on 9/11/2006 (rml, ). (Entered: 09/11/2006) ***FILED IN ERROR. Document # 38, Answer & Crossclaim. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (rml, ) (Entered: 09/11/2006) 09/11/2006 39 ***REPLACES #38*** RESPONSE to 22 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim,, PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (Baxter, Samuel) Modified on 9/12/2006 (mpv, ). (Entered: 09/11/2006) 09/19/2006 40 ORDER dismissing defts Cox Communications, Inc. and Cox Enterprises, Inc. without prejudice. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 9/19/06. (ehs, ) (Entered: 09/19/2006) 41 ORDER - the court transfers this case to the Honorable T. John Ward. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 9/20/06. (ch, ) (Entered: 09/20/2006) 42 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert Christopher Bunt on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Bunt, Robert) (Entered: 09/21/2006) 43 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Charles Ainsworth on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Ainsworth, Charles) (Entered: 09/21/2006) 44 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Rembrandt Technologies, LP's Complaint for Patent Infringement by Coxcom, Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Answer)(Decaire, Candice) (Entered: 09/27/2006) 45 ORDER granting 44 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Deadline extended to 10/6/06 for deft Coxcom, Inc. to answer . Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 9/28/06. (ehs, ) (Entered: 09/28/2006) Answer Due Deadline Updated for Coxcom, Inc., to 10/6/2006. (ehs, ) (Entered: 09/28/2006) 46 ANSWER to Complaint and, COUNTERCLAIM against Rembrandt Technologies, LP by Coxcom, Inc.,.(Jones, Michael) (Entered:

09/08/2006 09/11/2006

09/11/2006

09/20/2006 09/21/2006 09/21/2006 09/27/2006

09/28/2006

09/28/2006 10/06/2006

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 14 of 19 Page 14 of 19

10/06/2006) 10/16/2006 47 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 10/16/2006) 48 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Charter Communications, Inc.,, Charter Communications Operating, LLC identifying Charter Communications, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Jones, Michael) (Entered: 10/18/2006) 49 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Coxcom, Inc., identifying Cox Communications, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Cox Enterprises, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Toliver, Leroy) (Entered: 10/24/2006) 50 ANSWER to Counterclaim by Rembrandt Technologies, LP.(Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 10/27/2006) 55 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Tonya R Deem for Cox Communications. (ch, ) (Entered: 01/09/2007) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Deem; Fee: $25, receipt number: 1-13130 (ch, ) (Entered: 01/09/2007) 51 ORDER - granting 47 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. Dft Cablebvision Systems Corporation and CSC Holdings, Inc. are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 11/13/06. (ch, ) (Entered: 11/13/2006) 52 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) and Brief in Support by Coxcom, Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Order USA Video case# 2 Exhibit 2 - Spalding Declaration# 3 Exhibit 3 Website# 4 Text of Proposed Order)(Jones, Michael) (Entered: 12/14/2006) 53 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS OF COXCOM, INC. by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 12/21/2006) 54 ORDER granting 53 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS OF COXCOM, INC. Responses due by 1/10/2007. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 12/29/06. (ch, ) (Entered: 12/29/2006) 56 RESPONSE in Opposition re 52 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) and Brief in Support filed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Jeffrey A. Carter# 2 Exhibit A# 3 Affidavit of Anthony Joseph Magee# 4 Exhibit A# 5 Exhibit B# 6 Exhibit C# 7 Exhibit D Part 1# 8 Exhibit D Part 2# 9 Exhibit E Part 1# 10 Exhibit E Part 2# 11 Exhibit F# 12 Exhibit G# 13 Exhibit H# 14 Exhibit I# 15 Exhibit J# 16 Exhibit K# 17 Exhibit L# 18

10/18/2006

10/24/2006

10/27/2006 10/30/2006 10/30/2006 11/13/2006

12/14/2006

12/21/2006

12/29/2006

01/10/2007

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 15 of 19 Page 15 of 19

Exhibit M# 19 Exhibit N# 20 Exhibit O# 21 Exhibit P# 22 Exhibit Q# 23 Exhibit R# 24 Exhibit S# 25 Exhibit T# 26 Exhibit U Part 1# 27 Exhibit U Part 2# 28 Exhibit V)(Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 01/10/2007) 01/22/2007 57 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 52 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) and Brief in Support by Coxcom, Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jones, Michael) (Entered: 01/22/2007) 58 ORDER granting 57 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply in support of motion to dismiss. Responses due by 1/26/2007. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 1/23/07. (ehs, ) (Entered: 01/23/2007) 59 REPLY to Response to Motion re 52 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) and Brief in Support filed by Coxcom, Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Supplemental Declaration of J. Spalding# 2 Exhibit 1# 3 Exhibit 2# 4 Exhibit 3# 5 Exhibit 4A-D)(Jones, Michael) (Entered: 01/26/2007) 60 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Allen Franklin Gardner on behalf of Charter Communications, Inc.,, Charter Communications Operating, LLC (Gardner, Allen) (Entered: 01/29/2007) 61 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Allen Franklin Gardner on behalf of Coxcom, Inc., (Gardner, Allen) (Entered: 01/29/2007) 62 REPLY to Response to Motion re 52 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) and Brief in Support SURREPLY IN OPPOSITION TO COXCOM INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION filed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 02/05/2007) 63 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Charter Communications, Inc.,, Charter Communications Operating, LLC, Coxcom, Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(DeVasto, Diane) (Entered: 03/02/2007) 64 NOTICE of Hearing: Scheduling Conference set for 4/3/2007 at 2:00 PM in Ctrm 106 (Marshall) before Judge T. John Ward. (shd, ) (Entered: 03/08/2007) 65 NOTICE by Coxcom, Inc., of Filing Motion for Transfer and Consolidation of Rembrandt Technologies, LP Patent Litigation Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407 (Attachments: # 1 MDL Motion for Transfer and Consolidation# 2 Motion Ex. A# 3 Motion Ex. B# 4 MDL Memorandum# 5 MDL Exhibit List# 6 MDL Notice of Appearance# 7 MDL Corporate Disclosure# 8 MDL Certificate of Service)(Stockwell, Mitchell) (Entered: 03/09/2007) 66 Additional Attachments to Main Document: 65 Notice (Other), Notice (Other).. (Attachments: # 1 MDL Ex. 1# 2 MDL Ex. 2# 3 MDL Ex. 3# 4 MDL Ex. 4# 5 MDL Ex. 5# 6 MDL Ex. 6# 7 MDL Ex. 7# 8 MDL Ex. 8# 9 MDL Ex. 9# 10 MDL Ex. 10# 11 MDL Ex. 11# 12 MDL Ex. 12# 13 MDL Ex. 13# 14 MDL Ex. 14# 15 MDL Ex. 15# 16 MDL Ex. 16# 17

01/23/2007

01/26/2007

01/29/2007

01/29/2007 02/05/2007

03/02/2007

03/08/2007

03/09/2007

03/09/2007

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 16 of 19 Page 16 of 19

MDL Ex. 17# 18 MDL Ex. 18# 19 MDL Ex. 19# 20 MDL Ex. 20# 21 MDL Ex. 21# 22 MDL Ex. 22# 23 MDL Ex. 23# 24 MDL Ex. 24# 25 MDL Ex. 25# 26 MDL Ex. 26# 27 MDL Ex. 27# 28 MDL Ex. 28# 29 MDL Ex. 29# 30 MDL Ex. 30# 31 MDL EX. 31# 32 MDL Ex. 32# 33 MDL Ex. 33# 34 MDL Ex. 34# 35 MDL Ex. 35# 36 MDL Ex. 36# 37 MDL Ex. 37# 38 MDL Ex. 38# 39 MDL Ex. 39# 40 MDL Ex. 40# 41 MDL Ex. 41# 42 MDL Ex. 42# 43 MDL Ex. 43)(Stockwell, Mitchell) (Entered: 03/09/2007) 03/14/2007 67 NOTICE of Scheduling conference, proposed deadlines for docket control order and discovery. Scheduling Conference set for 4/3/07 at 2:00 pm, in Marshall, Tx (djh, ) (Entered: 03/14/2007) 68 RESPONSE in Opposition re 63 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 03/19/2007) 69 Consent MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Charter Communications, Inc.,, Charter Communications Operating, LLC, Coxcom, Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order # 2 Exhibit 1) (DeVasto, Diane) (Entered: 03/26/2007) 70 NOTICE by Charter Communications, Inc.,, Charter Communications Operating, LLC, Coxcom, Inc., of Developments in Related Cases (Attachments: # 1 Order Staying Civil Actions)(Jones, Michael) (Entered: 03/29/2007) 71 NOTICE by Rembrandt Technologies, LP Joint Notice of Conference Regarding Proposed Discovery Order and Docket Control Order (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Discovery Order and Docket Control Order)(Carter, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/30/2007) 72 ORDER granting 69 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages concerning deft's reply memorandum in support of motion to consolidate cases for pretrial proceedings. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 4/2/07. (ehs, ) (Entered: 04/02/2007) 73 REPLY to Response to Motion re 63 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Charter Communications, Inc.,, Charter Communications Operating, LLC, Coxcom, Inc.,. (DeVasto, Diane) (Entered: 04/02/2007) 74 ORDER referring case to Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham in accordance with the assignments made by General Order 07-03. The magistrate judge shall conduct pre-trial proceedings pursuant to 28 USC 636. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 4/2/07. (ch, ) (Entered: 04/03/2007) 75 NOTICE by Rembrandt Technologies, LP NOTICE OF FILING OPPOSITION TO COXCOM'S MOTION FOR TRANSFER AND CONSOLIDATION OF REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP PATENT LITIGATION (Attachments: # 1 Reasons Why Oral Argument Should be Heard in Opposition to CoxCom's Motion for Transfer and Consolidation# 2 Response to CoxCom's Motion for Transfer and Consolidation# 3 Rembrandt's Brief in Opposition to CoxCom's Motion

03/19/2007 03/26/2007

03/29/2007

03/30/2007

04/02/2007

04/02/2007

04/03/2007

04/05/2007

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 17 of 19 Page 17 of 19

for Transfer and Consolidation# 4 Exhibit List# 5 Exhibit 1# 6 Exhibit 2# 7 Exhibit 3# 8 Exhibit 4# 9 Exhibit 5# 10 Exhibit 6# 11 Exhibit 7# 12 Exhibit 8# 13 Exhibit 9# 14 Exhibit 10# 15 Exhibit 11# 16 Exhibit 12# 17 Exhibit 13# 18 Proof of Service)(Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 04/05/2007) 04/12/2007 76 RESPONSE to 65 Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Response to the Motion to Consolidate Cases by Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast Corporation, Comcast of Plano, LP. (Doan, Jennifer) Amended Certificate of Service added on 4/13/2007 (mpv, ). Modified on 4/13/2007 (mpv, ). (Entered: 04/12/2007) 77 SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re 63 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 04/12/2007) 78 NOTICE by Charter Communications, Inc.,, Charter Communications Operating, LLC, Coxcom, Inc., Notice of Development (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Hearing)(Gardner, Allen) (Entered: 04/18/2007) 79 ORDER REGARDING THE PROTECTIVE ORDER AND DOCUMENT PRODUCTION. Signed by Judge Charles Everingham on 4/18/07. (ch, ) (Entered: 04/19/2007) 80 DOCKET CONTROL ORDER Respond to Amendeding Pleadings 11/30/07. Amended Pleadings due by 11/16/2007. Discovery due by 5/14/2008. Joinder of Parties due by 5/3/2007.Claims Construction Hearing set for 2/13/2008 - 2/14/08 9:00 AM before Judge T. John Ward. Motions in limine due by 7/21/2008. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 7/21/2008. Jury Selection set for 8/4/2008 9:00AM before Judge T. John Ward. Pretrial Conference set for 7/24/2008 9:30 AM before Judge T. John Ward. Privilege Logs to be exchanged by parties 6/4/07. All other deadlines are set forth herein. Signed by Judge Charles Everingham on 4/19/07. (ch, ) (Entered: 04/19/2007) 81 NOTICE by Rembrandt Technologies, LP NOTICE REGARDING THE PROTECTIVE ORDER (Attachments: # 1 Attachment A)(Baxter, Samuel) CORRECTED PROPOSED ORDER added on 4/25/2007 (mpv, ). Modified on 4/25/2007 (mpv, ). (Entered: 04/24/2007) 82 NOTICE by Rembrandt Technologies, LP NOTICE REGARDING ELECTRONIC PRODUCTION (Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 04/24/2007) NOTICE re 81 Notice (Other) CORRECTED PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER NOW ATTACHED. (mpv, ) (Entered: 04/25/2007) 83 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Charles Everingham : Scheduling Conference held on 4/30/2007. (Court Reporter Debbie Latham.)(delat, ) (Entered: 04/30/2007) TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on 4/3/07 before Judge Chad Everingham. Court Reporter: Transcriber/Susan Simmons. (lss) (Entered:

04/12/2007

04/18/2007

04/19/2007

04/19/2007

04/24/2007

04/24/2007 04/25/2007

04/30/2007

05/03/2007

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 18 of 19 Page 18 of 19

05/03/2007) 05/03/2007 85 NOTICE by Rembrandt Technologies, LP PLAINTIFF REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP'S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH PATENT RULES 3-1 AND 3-2 (Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 05/03/2007) 86 NOTICE by Charter Communications, Inc.,, Charter Communications Operating, LLC of Disclosures (Gardner, Allen) (Entered: 05/03/2007) 87 NOTICE of Disclosure by Coxcom, Inc.,, Coxcom, Inc.,, Coxcom, Inc., Notice of Service of Initial Disclosures (Stockwell, Mitchell) (Entered: 05/04/2007) 88 NOTICE of Disclosure by Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 05/04/2007) 89 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Charles Everingham on 5/4/07. (ehs, ) (Entered: 05/04/2007) 90 NOTICE of Disclosure by Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 05/18/2007) 91 Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct the Docket Control Order to Move the Date for Exchanging Privilege Logs by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Carter, Jeffrey) (Entered: 06/04/2007) 92 ORDER granting 91 Motion to Amend/Correct. Docket Control Order is amended to move the date for parties to exchange privilege logs to 7/10/07. Signed by Judge Charles Everingham on 6/5/07. (ch, ) (Entered: 06/06/2007) 93 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Thomas Guy Fasone, III on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Fasone, Thomas) (Entered: 06/08/2007) 94 NOTICE of Disclosure by Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 06/12/2007) 95 NOTICE of Disclosure by Charter Communications, Inc.,, Charter Communications Operating, LLC P.R. 3-3 and P.R. 3-4 (Gardner, Allen) (Entered: 06/14/2007) 96 NOTICE of Disclosure by Coxcom, Inc., P.R. 3-3 and P.R. 3-4 (Gardner, Allen) (Entered: 06/14/2007) 97 NOTICE by All Defendants of Multi-District Litigation Developments Pursuant to Local Rule CV-42 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Gardner, Allen) (Entered: 06/21/2007) 98 Interdistrict transfer to the District of Delaware, Wilmington, De. Purusant to letter Elizabeth Dinan was notified. Certified copy of Docket Sheet, Complaint, Transfer Order and Letter were mailed to the Federal Blding, Lockbox 18, 844 N. King Street Wilmington, DE(ch, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 6/28/2007 (ch, ). Modified on 6/28/2007 (ch, ). (Entered: 06/27/2007)

05/03/2007 05/04/2007

05/04/2007 05/04/2007 05/18/2007 06/04/2007

06/06/2007

06/08/2007 06/12/2007 06/14/2007

06/14/2007 06/21/2007

06/27/2007

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 19 of 19 Page 19 of 19

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
07/02/2007 13:26:08 PACER Login: Description: ud0037 Docket Report Client Code: Search Criteria: Cost: 2:06-cv-00223-TJWCE 0.80

Billable Pages: 10

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-2 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 21

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 08/07/2006

Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-2 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 21

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 08/07/2006

Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-3 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 22

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 08/17/2006

Page 1 of 9 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ) CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ) OPERATING, LLC, COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC., COXCOM, INC., ) COX ENTERPRISES, INC., CSC HOLDINGS, ) ) INC. AND CABLEVISION SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION ) ) Defendants. ) REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP

Case No. 2:06-CV-223 Judge Leonard E. Davis JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DEFENDANTS' CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING LLC ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, AND COUNTERCLAIMS Defendants Charter Communications, Inc. and Charter Communications Operating LLC (collectively "Charter"), answers Rembrandt Technologies, LP's ("Rembrandt") Complaint For Patent Infringement as follows: The Parties 1. Charter lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth

of the allegations of paragraph 1, and demands strict proof thereof. 2. 3. 4. Charter admits the allegations of paragraph 2 for purposes of this litigation only. Charter admits the allegations of paragraph 3. Charter lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth

of the allegations of paragraph 4.

1

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-3 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 22

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 08/17/2006

Page 2 of 9 Page 2 of 9

5.

Charter lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth

of the allegations of paragraph 5. 6. Charter lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth

of the allegations of paragraph 6. 7. Charter lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth

of the allegations of paragraph 7. 8. Charter lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth

of the allegations of paragraph 8. Jurisdiction and Venue 9. 10. claims. 11. 12. Charter denies the allegations of paragraph 11. Charter admits the allegations of paragraph 12 for purposes of this litigation only. Count 1 ­ Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,243,627 13. Charter restates and incorporates by reference its responses to the allegations of Charter admits that this action invokes the United States patent laws. Charter admits that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over patent law

paragraphs 1-12. 14. Charter lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth

of the allegations of paragraph 14 and demands strict proof thereof. 15. Charter admits that the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO")

issued U.S. Patent No. 5,243,627 ("the `627 patent") on September 7, 1993. Charter lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations of paragraph 15. 16. Charter admits the allegations of paragraph 16.

2

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-3 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 22

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 08/17/2006

Page 3 of 9 Page 3 of 9

17. 18.

Charter denies the allegations of paragraph 17. Charter denies the allegations of paragraph 18. Count II ­ Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,852,631

19.

Charter restates and incorporates by reference its responses to the allegations of

paragraphs 1-18. 20. Charter lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth

of the allegations of paragraph 20 and demands strict proof thereof. 21. Charter admits that the USPTO issued U.S. Patent No. 5,852,631 ("the `631

patent") on December 22, 1998. Charter lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations of paragraph 21. 22. 23. 24. Charter denies the allegations of paragraph 22. Charter denies the allegations of paragraph 23. Charter denies the allegations of paragraph 24. Count III ­ Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,719,858 25. Charter restates and incorporates by reference its responses to the allegations of

paragraphs 1-24. 26. Charter lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth

of the allegations of paragraph 26 and demands strict proof thereof. 27. Charter admits that the USPTO issued U.S. Patent No. 5,719,858 (the `858

patent") on February 17, 1998. Charter lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations of paragraph 27. 28. 29. 30. Charter denies the allegations of paragraph 28. Charter denies the allegations of paragraph 29. Charter denies the allegations of paragraph 30.

3

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-3 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 22

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 08/17/2006

Page 4 of 9 Page 4 of 9

Count IV ­ Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,937,819 31. Charter restates and incorporates by reference its responses to the allegations of

paragraphs 1-30. 32. Charter lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth

of the allegations of paragraph 32 and demands strict proof thereof. 33. Charter admits that the USPTO issued U.S. Patent No. 4,937,819 ("the `819

patent") on June 26, 1990. Charter lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations of paragraph 33. 34. 35. 36. Charter denies the allegations of paragraph 34. Charter denies the allegations of paragraph 35. Charter denies the allegations of paragraph 36. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 1. The claims of the `627 patent are invalid for failure to satisfy one or more of the

requirements of Sections 101, 102, 103 and 112 of Title 35 of the United States Code. 2. The claims of the `631 patent are invalid for failure to satisfy one or more of the

requirements of Sections 101, 102, 103 and 112 of Title 35 of the United States Code. 3. The claims of the `858 patent are invalid for failure to satisfy one or more of the

requirements of Sections 101, 102, 103 and 112 of Title 35 of the United States Code. 4. The claims of the `819 patent are invalid for failure to satisfy one or more of the

requirements of Sections 101, 102, 103 and 112 of Title 35 of the United States Code. 5. The claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the doctrines of laches or estoppel.

4

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-3 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 22

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 08/17/2006

Page 5 of 9 Page 5 of 9

COUNTERCLAIMS Defendant Charter, for its Counterclaims against Rembrandt, states as follows: Jurisdiction 1. These Counterclaims arise under the United States patent laws and the declaratory

judgment statute. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1338(a), 1367, 1400, 2201 and 2202. Factual Background 2. In its Complaint, Rembrandt asserts that Charter has infringed and does infringe

the `627, `631, `858 and `819 patents, directly and/or indirectly. 3. The `627, `631, `858 and `819 patents are invalid, and have not been and are not

infringed by Charter, either directly or indirectly. 4. Consequently, there is an actual case or controversy between the parties over the

infringement, validity, and/or enforceability of the `627, `631, `858 and `819 patents. First Counterclaim 5. Charter restates and incorporates by reference its allegations in paragraphs 1-4 of

its Counterclaims. 6. Charter has not infringed and does not infringe, directly or indirectly, any valid

and enforceable claim of the `627 patent. 7. This is an exceptional case under 35 U.S.C. § 285 because Rembrandt filed its

Complaint with knowledge of the facts stated in this Counterclaim. Second Counterclaim 8. Charter restates and incorporates by reference its allegations in paragraphs 1-4 of

its Counterclaims.

5

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-3 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 22

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 08/17/2006

Page 6 of 9 Page 6 of 9

9.

Charter has not infringed and does not infringe, directly or indirectly, any valid

and enforceable claim of the `631 patent. 10. This is an exceptional case under 35 U.S.C. § 285 because Rembrandt filed its

Complaint with knowledge of the facts stated in this Counterclaim. Third Counterclaim 11. Charter restates and incorporates by reference its allegations in paragraphs 1-4 of

its Counterclaims. 12. Charter has not infringed and does not infringe, directly or indirectly, any valid

and enforceable claim of the `858 patent. 13. This is an exceptional case under 35 U.S.C. § 285 because Rembrandt filed its

Complaint with knowledge of the facts stated in this Counterclaim. Fourth Counterclaim 14. Charter restates and incorporates by reference its allegations in paragraphs 1-4 of

its Counterclaims. 15. Charter has not infringed and does not infringe, directly or indirectly, any valid

and enforceable claim of the `819 patent. 16. This is an exceptional case under 35 U.S.C. § 285 because Rembrandt filed its

Complaint with knowledge of the facts stated in this Counterclaim. Fifth Counterclaim 17. Charter restates and incorporates by reference its allegations in paragraphs 1-4 of

its Counterclaims. 18. The claims of the `627 patent are invalid under one or more of 35 U.S.C. §§ 101,

102, 103 and 112.

6

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-3 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 22

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 08/17/2006

Page 7 of 9 Page 7 of 9

19.

This is an exceptional case under 35 U.S.C. § 285 because Rembrandt filed its

Complaint with knowledge of the facts stated in this Counterclaim. Sixth Counterclaim 20. Charter restates and incorporates by reference its allegations in paragraphs 1-4 of

its Counterclaims. 21. The claims of the `631 patent are invalid under one or more of 35 U.S.C. §§ 101,

102, 103 and 112. 22. This is an exceptional case under 35 U.S.C. § 285 because Rembrandt filed its

Complaint with knowledge of the facts stated in this Counterclaim. Seventh Counterclaim 23. Charter restates and incorporates by reference its allegations in paragraphs 1-4 of

its Counterclaims. 24. The claims of the `858 patent are invalid under one or more of 35 U.S.C. §§ 101,

102, 103 and 112. 25. This is an exceptional case under 35 U.S.C. § 285 because Rembrandt filed its

Complaint with knowledge of the facts stated in this Counterclaim. Eighth Counterclaim 26. Charter restates and incorporates by reference its allegations in paragraphs 1-4 of

its Counterclaims. 27. The claims of the `819 patent are invalid under one or more of 35 U.S.C. §§ 101,

102, 103 and 112. 28. This is an exceptional case under 35 U.S.C. § 285 because Rembrandt filed its

Complaint with knowledge of the facts stated in this Counterclaim.

7

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-3 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 22

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 08/17/2006

Page 8 of 9 Page 8 of 9

PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Charter respectfully requests that this Court order judgment in its favor on each and every Counterclaim set forth above, and award it relief including, but not limited to, the following: (a) (b) Dismissal of all of Rembrandt's claims against Charter with prejudice; Entry of judgment declaring that the claims of the `627, `631, `858 and `819 patents are not infringed by Charter; Entry of judgment declaring that the claims of the `627, `631, `858 and `819 patents are invalid; An injunction permanently enjoining Rembrandt and its officers, agents, servants, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them, from bringing or threatening to bring any suit or charge against Charter relating to alleged infringement of the `627, `631, `858 and `819 patents; A declaration that this action is an exceptional case under 35 U.S.C. § 285 and an award to Charter of its attorneys' fees incurred in defending this action; and Such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper under the circumstances. Respectfully submitted, CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING, LLC By: /s/ Bradford P. Lyerla, by permission Michael E. Jones Bradford P. Lyerla, Attorney in Charge Pro Hac Vice Pending Email: [email protected] Kevin D. Hogg Pro Hac Vice Pending Email: [email protected] William J. Kramer Pro Hac Vice Pending Email: [email protected] Paul B. Stephens Pro Hac Vice Pending Email: [email protected]

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Dated: August 17, 2006

8

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-3 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 22

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 08/17/2006

Page 9 of 9 Page 9 of 9

MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP 6300 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606-6357 Tel: (312) 474-6300 Fax: (312) 474-0448 Michael E. Jones State Bar No. 10929400 POTTER MINTON, PC 110 North College 500 Plaza Tower Tyler, Texas 75702 Tel: (903) 597-8311 Fax: (903) 593-0846 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Defendants, CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument has been forwarded via the Court's CM/ECF Filing System or via first class mail to each attorney/party of record on August 17, 2006.

/s/ Michael E. Jones

9

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS

Document 99-4

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 1

SEALED DOCUMENT

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS

Document 99-5

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 1

FILED IN ERROR

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS

Document 99-6

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 1

FILED IN ERROR

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-7 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 26

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 08/17/2006

Page 1 of 3 Page 1 of 3

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-7 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 26

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 08/17/2006

Page 2 of 3 Page 2 of 3

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-7 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 26

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 08/17/2006

Page 3 of 3 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-8 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 27

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 08/17/2006

Page 1 of 3 Page 1 of 3

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-8 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 27

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 08/17/2006

Page 2 of 3 Page 2 of 3

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-8 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 27

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 08/17/2006

Page 3 of 3 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-9 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 28

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 08/17/2006

Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-9 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 28

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 08/17/2006

Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99-10 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 29

Filed 08/17/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99-10 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 29

Filed 08/17/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99-11 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 30

Filed 08/17/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 3 Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99-11 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 30

Filed 08/17/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 2 of 3 Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99-11 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 30

Filed 08/17/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 3 of 3 Page 3 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99-12 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 31

Filed 08/17/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99-12 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 31

Filed 08/17/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99-13 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 32

Filed 08/17/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99-13 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 32

Filed 08/17/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99-14 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 33

Filed 08/17/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99-14 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 33

Filed 08/17/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-15 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 11 of 4 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Case 2:06-cv-00223-LED Document 25-1 Document 34-1 Filed 06/28/2007 Page of of 4 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ) CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ) OPERATING, LLC, COX ) COMMUNICATIONS, INC., COXCOM, ) INC., COX ENTERPRISES, INC., CSC ) HOLDINGS, INC., and CABLEVISION ) SYSTEMS CORPORATION ) _____________________________________ )

REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP

Case No. 2-06CV-223 LED

AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP'S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff Rembrandt Technologies, LP, by its counsel Mr. Robert Chris Bunt, has agreed that Defendants Cox Communications, Inc., Coxcom, Inc., and Cox Enterprises, Inc. may move the Court to enlarge the period of time for Defendants' response to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement by thirty (30) days, that is ­ up to and including September 27, 2006. Good cause exists for granting this motion, which is made on the ground that additional time is necessary to allow Defendants' counsel sufficiently to confer with their clients and appropriately to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement.

1

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-15 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 22 of 4 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Case 2:06-cv-00223-LED Document 25-1 Document 34-1 Filed 06/28/2007 Page of of 4 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 2 4

Accordingly, Defendants Cox Communications, Inc., Coxcom, Inc., and Cox Enterprises, Inc. respectfully request that the Court enlarge the time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement up until and including September 27, 2006. Respectfully submitted, this 21st day of August, 2006.

___________/s/_______________________
Candice C. Decaire Georgia Bar No. 209815 KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP 1100 Peachtree St NE Suite 2800 Atlanta GA 30309-4530 Telephone: 404-815-6214 Facsimile: 404-815-6555 Michael Edwin Jones POTTER MINTON PC 110 N. College, Suite 500 P.O. Box 359 Tyler, TX 75710-0359 Telephone: 903-597-8311 Facsimile: 903-593-0846 Attorneys for Cox Communications, Inc., Coxcom, Inc., and Cox Enterprises, Inc.

2

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-15 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 33 of 4 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Case 2:06-cv-00223-LED Document 25-1 Document 34-1 Filed 06/28/2007 Page of of 4 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 3 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP Plaintiff, v. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING, LLC, COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC., COXCOM, INC., COX ENTERPRISES, INC., CSC HOLDINGS, INC., and CABLEVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No. 2-06CV-223 LED

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE The undersigned certifies that counsel for Defendants Cox Communications, Inc., Coxcom, Inc., and Cox Enterprises, Inc. conferred with counsel for Plaintiff, Robert Chris Bunt, Esq., and counsel for Plaintiff does not oppose Defendants' motion for extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement.

________/s/___________________ Candice C. Decaire

3

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-15 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 44 of 4 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Case 2:06-cv-00223-LED Document 25-1 Document 34-1 Filed 06/28/2007 Page of of 4 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 4 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES,, LP Plaintiff, v. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING, LLC, COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC., COXCOM, INC., COX ENTERPRISES, INC., CSC HOLDINGS, INC., and CABLEVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No. 2-06CV-223 LED

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of this AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP'S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a) and contemporaneously served upon all counsel who have consented to electronic service. Other counsel shall be served by first class mail.

______________/s/_________________ Candice C. Decaire

4

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-16 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 11 of 1 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Case 2:06-cv-00223-LED Document 25-2 Document 34-2 Filed 06/28/2007 Page of of 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP Plaintiff, v. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING, LLC, COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC., COXCOM, INC., COX ENTERPRISES, INC., CSC HOLDINGS, INC., and CABLEVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No. 2-06CV-223 LED

ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP'S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Upon reviewing the Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Rembrandt Technologies, LP's Complaint for Patent Infringement filed by Defendants Cox Communications, Inc., Coxcom, Inc., and Cox Enterprises, Inc., this Court finds that there is good cause for a thirty (30) day enlargement of time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's complaint and accordingly GRANTS the Agreed Motion. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants Cox Communications, Inc., Coxcom, Inc., and Cox Enterprises, Inc. shall be required to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement on or before September 27, 2006.

_______________________________ United States District Court, E.D. Texas 5

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99-17 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 35 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 1 of 1 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 1 of 1 Case 2:06-cv-00223-LED Document 34 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP Plaintiff, v. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING, LLC, COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC., COXCOM, INC., COX ENTERPRISES, INC., CSC HOLDINGS, INC., and CABLEVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No. 2-06CV-223 LED

ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP'S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Upon reviewing the Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Rembrandt Technologies, LP's Complaint for Patent Infringement filed by Defendants Cox Communications, Inc., Coxcom, Inc., and Cox Enterprises, Inc., this Court finds that there is good cause for a thirty (30) day enlargement of time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's complaint and accordingly GRANTS the Agreed Motion. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants Cox Communications, Inc., Coxcom, Inc., and Cox Enterprises, Inc. shall be required to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement on or before September 27, 2006.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 29th day of August, 2006.

__________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-18 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 36-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/06/2006

Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP

) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2-06CV-223 LED ) CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ) CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ) OPERATING, LLC, COX ) COMMUNICATIONS, INC., COXCOM, ) INC., COX ENTERPRISES, INC., CSC ) HOLDINGS, INC., and CABLEVISION ) SYSTEMS CORPORATION ) _____________________________________ )

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses without prejudice its allegations against Defendants Cox Enterprises, Inc. and Cox Communications, Inc. Respectfully submitted, this 6th day of September, 2006.

_/s/ Sam Baxter___________________ Sam Baxter State Bar No. 01938000 MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. 505 E. Travis, Suite 105 Marshall, Texas 75670 Telephone: 903-927-2111 Facsimile: 903-927-2622 Attorneys for Plaintiff Rembrandt Technologies, LP

/s/ Mitchell G. Stockwell (by SFB w/permission) Mitchell G. Stockwell Lead Attorney Georgia Bar No. 682912 Candice C. Decaire Georgia Bar No. 209815 KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP 1100 Peachtree St NE, Suit 2800 Atlanta GA 30309-4530 Telephone: 404-815-6214 Facsimile: 404-815-6555

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a (1) - PAGE 1
Dallas 225150v1

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-18 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 36-1

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/06/2006

Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2

Robert M. Parker State Bar #15498000 Robert C. Bunt State Bar #00787165 PARKER & BUNT P.C. 100 E. Ferguson, Suite 1114 Tyler, Texas 75702 Tel: 903-533-9288 Fax: 903-533-9687 Attorneys for Plaintiff Rembrandt Technologies, LP

Michael Edwin Jones POTTER MINTON PC 110 N. College, Suite 500 P.O. Box 359 Tyler, TX 75710-0359 Telephone: 903-597-8311 Facsimile: 903-593-0846 Attorneys for Cox Communications, Inc., Coxcom, Inc., and Cox Enterprises, Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of this NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(A)(1) was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a) and contemporaneously served upon all counsel who have consented to electronic service. Other counsel shall be served by first class mail on this the 6th day of September, 2006.

/s/ Sam Baxter________________________ Sam Baxter

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a (1) - PAGE 2
Dallas 225150v1

Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 99-19 Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 36-2

Filed 06/28/2007 Filed 09/06/2006

Page 1 of 1 Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION § § Plaintiff, § § vs. § Case No. 2:06-CV-223 LED § CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; § CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING, § LLC; COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; § JURY TRIAL REQUESTED COX ENTERPRISES, INC.; COXCOM, INC.; § CSC HOLDINGS, INC. and CABLEVISION § SYSTEMS CORPORATION, § § Defendants. § REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP,

ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS COX ENTERPRISES INC. AND COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Plaintiff Rembrandt Technologies, LP ("Rembrandt") filed a "Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice, Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)" to dismiss Defendants Cox Enterprises, Inc. and Cox Communications, Inc. from this action. After

considering the Notice and finding that neither Cox Enterprises, Inc. nor Cox Communications, Inc., has filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment in this action, the Court hereby dismisses, without prejudice, the allegations against Cox Enterprises, Inc. and Cox Communications, Inc.

Dallas 224931v1

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99-20 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 37

Filed 09/08/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 3 Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP, Plaintiff, v. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING, LLC, COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC., COXCOM, INC., COX ENTERPRISES, INC., CSC HOLDINGS, INC. AND CABLEVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § §

CASE NO. 2:06-CV-223 [LED] JURY TRIAL REQUESTED

REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP'S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Rembrandt Technologies, LP ("Rembrandt"), hereby advises the Court that Rembrandt, a New Jersey limited partnership, has no parent corporation, nor is there any publicly held corporation that has a 10% or more ownership interest in Rembrandt.

REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES,LP'S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - PAGE 1
Dallas 225066v1

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 99-20 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 37

Filed 09/08/2006 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 2 of 3 Page 2 of 3

DATED: September 8, 2006

Respectfully submitted,

___/s/ Sam Baxter___________________ Sam Baxter State Bar No. 01938000 McKOOL SMITH, P.C. 505 E. Travis, Suite 105 Marshall, Texas 75670 Telephone: (903) 927-2111 Telecopier: (903) 927-2622 [email protected] Jeffrey A. Carter State Bar No. 03919400 McKOOL SMITH, P.C. 300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 978-4006 Telecopier: (214) 978-4044 [email protected] Travis Gordon White State Bar No. 21333000 McKOOL SMITH, P.C. 300 W. 6th Street, Suite 1700 Austin, Texas 78701 Telephone: (512) 692-8700 Telecopier: (512) 692-8744 [email protected] Robert M. Parker State Bar No. 15498000 Robert Christopher Bunt State Bar No. 00787165 PARKER & BUNT, P.C. 100 E. Ferguson, Suite 1114 Tyler, Texas 75702 Telephone: (903) 531-3535 Tel