Free Remark - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 19 Page 1 of 19

CLOSED, DISCMAG, JURY, PATENT

U.S. District Court [LIVE] Eastern District of TEXAS LIVE (Marshall) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE

Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Charter Communications, Inc., et al Assigned to: Judge T. John Ward Referred to: Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham Cause: 35:271 Patent Infringement Plaintiff Rembrandt Technologies, LP

Date Filed: 06/01/2006 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 830 Patent Jurisdiction: Federal Question

represented by Robert M Parker Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth, P.C. 100 E Ferguson Suite 1114 Tyler, TX 75702 903/531-3535 Fax: 9035339687 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Samuel Franklin Baxter McKool Smith - Marshall P O Box O Marshall, TX 75671 US 903/927-2111 Fax: 903/927-2622 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Bradley Wayne Caldwell McKool Smith 300 Crescent Court Suite 1500 Dallas, TX 75201 214/978-4000 Fax: 2149784044 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Charles Ainsworth Parker Bunt & Ainsworth 100 E Ferguson Suite 1114

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 2 of 19 Page 2 of 19

Tyler, TX 75702 US 903/531-3535 Fax: 903/533-9687 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Franklin Jones, Jr Jones & Jones - Marshall 201 W Houston St PO Drawer 1249 Marshall, TX 75670 903/938-4395 Fax: 9039383360 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jeffrey A Carter McKool Smith - Dallas 300 Crescent Court Suite 1200 Dallas, TX 75201 214/978-4006 Fax: 12149784044 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED John Franklin Garvish, II McKool Smith - Austin 300 W 6th St Ste 1700 Austin, TX 78701 512/692-8731 Fax: 512/692-8744 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Robert Christopher Bunt Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth, P.C. 100 East Ferguson, Ste. 1114 Tyler, TX 75702 903/531-3535 Fax: 903/533-9687 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Thomas Guy Fasone, III McKool Smith 300 Crescent Court Suite 1500

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 3 of 19 Page 3 of 19

Dallas, TX 75201 214/978-4000 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Travis Gordon White McKool Smith 300 W 6th St Ste 1700 Austin, TX 78701 512/692-8701 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED V. Defendant Charter Communications, Inc., represented by Allen Franklin Gardner Potter Minton PC 110 N College Suite 500 PO Box 359 Tyler, TX 75710-0359 903/597-8311 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Bradford P Lyerla Marshall Gerstein & Borun 233 S Wacker Dr 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606-6357 312/474-6300 Fax: 312/474-0448 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Charles Edward Juister Marshall Gerstein & Borun 233 S Wacker Dr 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606-6357 312/474-6300 Fax: 312/474-0448 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Diane DeVasto Potter Minton

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 4 of 19 Page 4 of 19

110 N. College Street, Suite 500 Tyler, Tx 75702 US 903-597-8311 Fax: 903-593-0846 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Gregory E Stanton Marshall Gerstein & Borun 233 S Wacker Dr 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606-6357 312/474-6300 Fax: 312/474-0448 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jon-Thomas Bloch Marshall Gerstein & Borun 233 S Wacker Dr 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606-6357 312/474-6300 Fax: 312/474-0448 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Kevin D Hogg Marshall Gerstein & Borun 233 S Wacker Dr 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606-6357 312/474-6300 Fax: 317/474-0448 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Margaret Lynn Begalle Marshall Gerstein & Borun 233 S Wacker Dr 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606-6357 312/474-6300 Fax: 312/474-0448 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Paul Bryan Stephens

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 5 of 19 Page 5 of 19

Marshall Gerstein & Borun 233 S Wacker Dr 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606-6357 312/474-6300 Fax: 312/474-0448 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED William Joseph Kramer Marshall Gerstein & Borun 233 S Wacker Dr 6300 Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606-6357 312/474-6300 Fax: 312/474-0448 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Defendant Charter Communications Operating, LLC represented by Allen Franklin Gardner (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Bradford P Lyerla (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Charles Edward Juister (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Diane DeVasto (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Gregory E Stanton (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jon-Thomas Bloch (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Kevin D Hogg (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Margaret Lynn Begalle (See above for address)

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 6 of 19 Page 6 of 19

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Paul Bryan Stephens (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED William Joseph Kramer (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Defendant Cox Communications, Inc. TERMINATED: 09/19/2006 represented by Candice C Decaire Kilpatrick Stockton LLP - Atlanta 1100 Peachtree St Ste 2800 Atlanta, GA 30309-4530 404/815-6033 Fax: 404/541-3218 Email: [email protected] Leroy M Toliver Kilpatrick Stockton 1100 Peachtree St Suite 2800 Atlanta, GA 30309 404/815-6483 Fax: 404/541-3274 Email: [email protected] Michael Edwin Jones Potter Minton PC 110 N College Suite 500 PO Box 359 Tyler, TX 75710-0359 903/597/8311 Fax: 9035930846 Email: [email protected] Mitchell G Stockwell Kilpatrick Stockton LLP 1100 Peachtree St Ste 2800 Atlanta, GA 30309-4530 404/815-6214 Fax: 14048156555 Email: [email protected]

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 7 of 19 Page 7 of 19

Defendant Cox Enterprises, Inc,. TERMINATED: 09/19/2006 represented by Candice C Decaire (See above for address) Leroy M Toliver (See above for address) Michael Edwin Jones (See above for address) Mitchell G Stockwell (See above for address) Defendant Coxcom, Inc., represented by Allen Franklin Gardner (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Candice C Decaire (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Diane DeVasto (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Leroy M Toliver (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Michael Edwin Jones (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Mitchell G Stockwell (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Tonya R Deem Kilpatrick Stockton LLP NC 1001 W Fourth Street Winston-Salem, NC 27101 336-607-7485 Fax: 336-607-7500 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Defendant CSC Holdings, Inc.

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 8 of 19 Page 8 of 19

Defendant Cablevision Systems Corporation Defendant All Defendants Movant Coxcom, Inc., Movant Comcast Cable Communications, LLC Movant Comcast Corporation Movant Comcast of Plano, LP Counter Claimant Charter Communications, Inc., represented by Michael Edwin Jones (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Counter Claimant Charter Communications Operating, LLC represented by Michael Edwin Jones (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V. Counter Defendant Rembrandt Technologies, LP Counter Claimant Coxcom, Inc., V. Counter Defendant Rembrandt Technologies, LP Date Filed 06/01/2006 # Docket Text 1 COMPLAINT against Cablevision Systems Corporation, Charter Communications, Inc.,, Charter Communications Operating, LLC, Cox Communications, Inc., Cox Enterprises, Inc,., Coxcom, Inc.,, CSC

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104

Filed 06/28/2007

Page 9 of 19 Page 9 of 19

Holdings, Inc. (Filing fee $ 350.) , filed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ehs, ) (Entered: 06/02/2006) 06/01/2006 06/01/2006 06/02/2006 06/28/2006 07/06/2006 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (ehs, ) (Entered: 06/02/2006) 2 Form mailed to Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks. (ehs, ) (Entered: 06/02/2006) Filing fee: $ 350.00, receipt number 2-1-1540 (ehs, ) (Entered: 06/06/2006) 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Franklin Jones, Jr on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Jones, Franklin) (Entered: 06/28/2006) 4 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (Bunt, Robert) Additional attachment(s) added on 7/7/2006 (mll, ). (Entered: 07/06/2006) 5 ORDER granting 4 Motion to Withdraw Fish & Richardson PC as Attorney. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 7/10/06. (fnt, ) (Entered: 07/11/2006) 16 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Leroy M Toliver for Coxcom, Inc.,; Cox Communications, Inc. and Cox Enterprises, Inc,.. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/07/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Toliver; Fee: $25, receipt number: 6-16091 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/07/2006) Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (ehs, ) (Entered: 09/06/2006) 6 NOTICE of Designation of Attorney in Charge to Samuel Franklin Baxter on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 07/25/2006) 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Travis Gordon White on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (White, Travis) (Entered: 07/25/2006) 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jeffrey A Carter on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Carter, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/25/2006) 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Bradley Wayne Caldwell on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Caldwell, Bradley) (Entered: 07/25/2006) 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John Franklin Garvish, II on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Garvish, John) (Entered: 07/25/2006) 15 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Mitchell G Stockwell for Coxcom, Inc.,; Cox Communications, Inc. and Cox Enterprises, Inc,.. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/07/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Stockwell; Fee: $25, receipt number: 21-1728 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/07/2006)

07/11/2006

07/24/2006

07/24/2006 07/24/2006 07/25/2006

07/25/2006 07/25/2006 07/25/2006

07/25/2006 07/26/2006

07/26/2006

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 10 of 19 Page 10 of 19

08/02/2006

12 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. Cablevision Systems Corporation served on 7/28/2006, answer due 8/17/2006. (ehs, ) (Entered: 08/04/2006) 14 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. Charter Communications Operating, LLC served on 7/28/2006, answer due 8/17/2006. (ehs, ) (Entered: 08/04/2006) 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael Edwin Jones on behalf of Cox Communications, Inc., Cox Enterprises, Inc,., Coxcom, Inc., (Jones, Michael) (Entered: 08/04/2006) 13 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. Charter Communications, Inc., served on 7/28/2006, answer due 8/17/2006. (ehs, ) (Entered: 08/04/2006) 17 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Candice C Decaire for Coxcom, Inc.,; Cox Communications, Inc. and Cox Enterprises, Inc,.. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/10/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Decaire; Fee: $25, receipt number: 2-11763 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/10/2006) 21 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Candice C Decaire for Coxcom, Inc.,; Cox Communications, Inc. and Cox Enterprises, Inc,.APPROVED (poa, ) (Entered: 08/14/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Decaire; Fee: $25, receipt number: 2-11763 (poa, ) (Entered: 08/14/2006) 18 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Returned Executed Certified Mail by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. Cox Communications, Inc. served on 8/2/2006, answer due 8/22/2006. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/10/2006) 19 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Returned Executed Certified Mail by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. Coxcom, Inc., served on 8/2/2006, answer due 8/22/2006. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/10/2006) 20 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Returned Executed Certified Mail by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. CSC Holdings, Inc. served on 7/31/2006, answer due 8/21/2006. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/10/2006) 22 Defendants' Charter Communications, Inc. and Charter Communications Operating LLC ANSWER to Complaint , Affirmative Defenses and, COUNTERCLAIM against Rembrandt Technologies, LP by Charter Communications, Inc.,, Charter Communications Operating, LLC.(Jones, Michael) (Entered: 08/17/2006) 26 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Bradford P Lyerla for Charter Communications, Inc., and Charter Communications Operating, LLC. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/24/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Lyerla; Fee: $25, receipt number: 6-16391 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/24/2006)

08/02/2006

08/04/2006

08/04/2006

08/07/2006

08/07/2006 08/07/2006

08/07/2006 08/09/2006

08/09/2006

08/09/2006

08/17/2006

08/17/2006

08/17/2006

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 11 of 19 Page 11 of 19

08/17/2006

27 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Kevin D Hogg for Charter Communications, Inc., and Charter Communications Operating, LLC. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/24/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Hogg; Fee: $25, receipt number: 6-16391 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/24/2006) 28 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney William Joseph Kramer for Charter Communications, Inc., and Charter Communications Operating, LLC. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/24/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Kramer; Fee: $25, receipt number: 6-16391 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/24/2006) 29 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Paul Bryan Stephens for Charter Communications, Inc., and Charter Communications Operating, LLC. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/24/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Stephens; Fee: $25, receipt number: 6-16391 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/24/2006) 30 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Margaret Lynn Begalle for Charter Communications, Inc., and Charter Communications Operating, LLC. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/25/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Begalle; Fee: $25, receipt number: 6-16391 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/25/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Begalle; Fee: $25, receipt number: 6-16391 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/25/2006) 31 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Gregory E Stanton for Charter Communications, Inc., and Charter Communications Operating, LLC. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/25/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Stanton; Fee: $25, receipt number: 6-16391 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/25/2006) 32 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Charles Edward Juister for Charter Communications, Inc., and Charter Communications Operating, LLC. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/25/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Juister; Fee: $25, receipt number: 6-16391 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/25/2006) 33 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Jon-Thomas Bloch for Charter Communications, Inc., and Charter Communications Operating, LLC. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/25/2006) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Bloch; Fee: $25, receipt number: 6-16391 (ch, ) (Entered: 08/25/2006) 23 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. Cox Enterprises, Inc,. served on 8/8/2006, answer due 8/28/2006. (ehs, ) (Entered: 08/18/2006)

08/17/2006 08/17/2006

08/17/2006 08/17/2006

08/17/2006 08/17/2006

08/17/2006 08/17/2006 08/17/2006

08/17/2006 08/17/2006

08/17/2006 08/17/2006

08/17/2006 08/18/2006

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 12 of 19 Page 12 of 19

08/21/2006

24 ***FILED IN ERROR; PLEASE IGNORE*** MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer /Respond to Rembrandt Technologies, LP's Complaint for Patent Infringement by Cox Communications, Inc., Cox Enterprises, Inc,., Coxcom, Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Agreed Motion to Extension of Time to Respond to Rembrandt Technologies, LP's Complaint for Patent Infringement)(Stockwell, Mitchell) Modified on 8/28/2006 (mpv, ). (Entered: 08/21/2006)

08/21/2006

25 ***FILED IN ERROR; ATTY USED WRONG EVENT TO DOCKET; PLEASE IGNORE*** ***FILED IN ERROR. Document # 24, Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer/Respond to Rembrandt Technologies, LP's Complaint for Patent Infringement. PLEASE IGNORE.*** Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Rembrandt Technologies, LP'S Complaint for Patent Infringement (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Rembrandt Technologies, LP's Complaint for Patent Infringement)(Decaire, Candice) Modified on 8/28/2006 (mpv, ). (Entered: 08/21/2006)

08/21/2006

34 ***REPLACES #24 & #25*** MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer/Respond re 1 Complaint, by Cox Communications, Inc., Cox Enterprises, Inc, Coxcom, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (mpv, ) Modified on 8/28/2006 (mpv, ). (Entered: 08/28/2006)

08/21/2006

***FILED IN ERROR. Document # 24, MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer /Respond to Rembrandt Technologies, LP's Complaint for Patent Infringement. PLEASE IGNORE. REPLACED BY #34*** (mpv, ) (Entered: 08/28/2006)

08/21/2006

***FILED IN ERROR. Document # 25, Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Rembrandt Technologies, LP'S Complaint for Patent Infringement. PLEASE IGNORE. DOCKETED INCORRECTLY BY ATTORNEY AS NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION; REPLACED BY #34*** (mpv, ) (Entered: 08/28/2006)

08/29/2006

35 ORDER granting 34 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Dft's Cox Communications, Inc., Coxcom, Inc., and Cox Enterprises, Inc. Deadline to answer Pla's Complaint is 9/27/06 . Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 8/29/06. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/29/2006) Answer Due Deadline Updated for Cox Communications, Inc. to

08/29/2006

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 13 of 19 Page 13 of 19

9/27/2006; Cox Enterprises, Inc,. to 9/27/2006; Coxcom, Inc., to 9/27/2006. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/29/2006) 09/06/2006 36 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 09/06/2006) 37 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 09/08/2006) 38 *** FILED IN ERROR - PLEASE IGNORE - TO BE REFILED ***ANSWER to Counterclaim, COUNTERCLAIM against Rembrandt Technologies, LP by Rembrandt Technologies, LP.(Baxter, Samuel) Modified on 9/11/2006 (rml, ). (Entered: 09/11/2006) ***FILED IN ERROR. Document # 38, Answer & Crossclaim. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (rml, ) (Entered: 09/11/2006) 09/11/2006 39 ***REPLACES #38*** RESPONSE to 22 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim,, PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (Baxter, Samuel) Modified on 9/12/2006 (mpv, ). (Entered: 09/11/2006) 09/19/2006 40 ORDER dismissing defts Cox Communications, Inc. and Cox Enterprises, Inc. without prejudice. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 9/19/06. (ehs, ) (Entered: 09/19/2006) 41 ORDER - the court transfers this case to the Honorable T. John Ward. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 9/20/06. (ch, ) (Entered: 09/20/2006) 42 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert Christopher Bunt on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Bunt, Robert) (Entered: 09/21/2006) 43 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Charles Ainsworth on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Ainsworth, Charles) (Entered: 09/21/2006) 44 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Rembrandt Technologies, LP's Complaint for Patent Infringement by Coxcom, Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Answer)(Decaire, Candice) (Entered: 09/27/2006) 45 ORDER granting 44 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Deadline extended to 10/6/06 for deft Coxcom, Inc. to answer . Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 9/28/06. (ehs, ) (Entered: 09/28/2006) Answer Due Deadline Updated for Coxcom, Inc., to 10/6/2006. (ehs, ) (Entered: 09/28/2006) 46 ANSWER to Complaint and, COUNTERCLAIM against Rembrandt Technologies, LP by Coxcom, Inc.,.(Jones, Michael) (Entered:

09/08/2006 09/11/2006

09/11/2006

09/20/2006 09/21/2006 09/21/2006 09/27/2006

09/28/2006

09/28/2006 10/06/2006

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 14 of 19 Page 14 of 19

10/06/2006) 10/16/2006 47 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 10/16/2006) 48 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Charter Communications, Inc.,, Charter Communications Operating, LLC identifying Charter Communications, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Jones, Michael) (Entered: 10/18/2006) 49 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Coxcom, Inc., identifying Cox Communications, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Cox Enterprises, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Toliver, Leroy) (Entered: 10/24/2006) 50 ANSWER to Counterclaim by Rembrandt Technologies, LP.(Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 10/27/2006) 55 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Tonya R Deem for Cox Communications. (ch, ) (Entered: 01/09/2007) Pro Hac Vice Filing fee paid by Deem; Fee: $25, receipt number: 1-13130 (ch, ) (Entered: 01/09/2007) 51 ORDER - granting 47 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. Dft Cablebvision Systems Corporation and CSC Holdings, Inc. are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 11/13/06. (ch, ) (Entered: 11/13/2006) 52 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) and Brief in Support by Coxcom, Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Order USA Video case# 2 Exhibit 2 - Spalding Declaration# 3 Exhibit 3 Website# 4 Text of Proposed Order)(Jones, Michael) (Entered: 12/14/2006) 53 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS OF COXCOM, INC. by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 12/21/2006) 54 ORDER granting 53 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS OF COXCOM, INC. Responses due by 1/10/2007. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 12/29/06. (ch, ) (Entered: 12/29/2006) 56 RESPONSE in Opposition re 52 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) and Brief in Support filed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Jeffrey A. Carter# 2 Exhibit A# 3 Affidavit of Anthony Joseph Magee# 4 Exhibit A# 5 Exhibit B# 6 Exhibit C# 7 Exhibit D Part 1# 8 Exhibit D Part 2# 9 Exhibit E Part 1# 10 Exhibit E Part 2# 11 Exhibit F# 12 Exhibit G# 13 Exhibit H# 14 Exhibit I# 15 Exhibit J# 16 Exhibit K# 17 Exhibit L# 18

10/18/2006

10/24/2006

10/27/2006 10/30/2006 10/30/2006 11/13/2006

12/14/2006

12/21/2006

12/29/2006

01/10/2007

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 15 of 19 Page 15 of 19

Exhibit M# 19 Exhibit N# 20 Exhibit O# 21 Exhibit P# 22 Exhibit Q# 23 Exhibit R# 24 Exhibit S# 25 Exhibit T# 26 Exhibit U Part 1# 27 Exhibit U Part 2# 28 Exhibit V)(Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 01/10/2007) 01/22/2007 57 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 52 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) and Brief in Support by Coxcom, Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jones, Michael) (Entered: 01/22/2007) 58 ORDER granting 57 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply in support of motion to dismiss. Responses due by 1/26/2007. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 1/23/07. (ehs, ) (Entered: 01/23/2007) 59 REPLY to Response to Motion re 52 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) and Brief in Support filed by Coxcom, Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Supplemental Declaration of J. Spalding# 2 Exhibit 1# 3 Exhibit 2# 4 Exhibit 3# 5 Exhibit 4A-D)(Jones, Michael) (Entered: 01/26/2007) 60 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Allen Franklin Gardner on behalf of Charter Communications, Inc.,, Charter Communications Operating, LLC (Gardner, Allen) (Entered: 01/29/2007) 61 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Allen Franklin Gardner on behalf of Coxcom, Inc., (Gardner, Allen) (Entered: 01/29/2007) 62 REPLY to Response to Motion re 52 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) and Brief in Support SURREPLY IN OPPOSITION TO COXCOM INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION filed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 02/05/2007) 63 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Charter Communications, Inc.,, Charter Communications Operating, LLC, Coxcom, Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(DeVasto, Diane) (Entered: 03/02/2007) 64 NOTICE of Hearing: Scheduling Conference set for 4/3/2007 at 2:00 PM in Ctrm 106 (Marshall) before Judge T. John Ward. (shd, ) (Entered: 03/08/2007) 65 NOTICE by Coxcom, Inc., of Filing Motion for Transfer and Consolidation of Rembrandt Technologies, LP Patent Litigation Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407 (Attachments: # 1 MDL Motion for Transfer and Consolidation# 2 Motion Ex. A# 3 Motion Ex. B# 4 MDL Memorandum# 5 MDL Exhibit List# 6 MDL Notice of Appearance# 7 MDL Corporate Disclosure# 8 MDL Certificate of Service)(Stockwell, Mitchell) (Entered: 03/09/2007) 66 Additional Attachments to Main Document: 65 Notice (Other), Notice (Other).. (Attachments: # 1 MDL Ex. 1# 2 MDL Ex. 2# 3 MDL Ex. 3# 4 MDL Ex. 4# 5 MDL Ex. 5# 6 MDL Ex. 6# 7 MDL Ex. 7# 8 MDL Ex. 8# 9 MDL Ex. 9# 10 MDL Ex. 10# 11 MDL Ex. 11# 12 MDL Ex. 12# 13 MDL Ex. 13# 14 MDL Ex. 14# 15 MDL Ex. 15# 16 MDL Ex. 16# 17

01/23/2007

01/26/2007

01/29/2007

01/29/2007 02/05/2007

03/02/2007

03/08/2007

03/09/2007

03/09/2007

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 16 of 19 Page 16 of 19

MDL Ex. 17# 18 MDL Ex. 18# 19 MDL Ex. 19# 20 MDL Ex. 20# 21 MDL Ex. 21# 22 MDL Ex. 22# 23 MDL Ex. 23# 24 MDL Ex. 24# 25 MDL Ex. 25# 26 MDL Ex. 26# 27 MDL Ex. 27# 28 MDL Ex. 28# 29 MDL Ex. 29# 30 MDL Ex. 30# 31 MDL EX. 31# 32 MDL Ex. 32# 33 MDL Ex. 33# 34 MDL Ex. 34# 35 MDL Ex. 35# 36 MDL Ex. 36# 37 MDL Ex. 37# 38 MDL Ex. 38# 39 MDL Ex. 39# 40 MDL Ex. 40# 41 MDL Ex. 41# 42 MDL Ex. 42# 43 MDL Ex. 43)(Stockwell, Mitchell) (Entered: 03/09/2007) 03/14/2007 67 NOTICE of Scheduling conference, proposed deadlines for docket control order and discovery. Scheduling Conference set for 4/3/07 at 2:00 pm, in Marshall, Tx (djh, ) (Entered: 03/14/2007) 68 RESPONSE in Opposition re 63 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 03/19/2007) 69 Consent MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Charter Communications, Inc.,, Charter Communications Operating, LLC, Coxcom, Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order # 2 Exhibit 1) (DeVasto, Diane) (Entered: 03/26/2007) 70 NOTICE by Charter Communications, Inc.,, Charter Communications Operating, LLC, Coxcom, Inc., of Developments in Related Cases (Attachments: # 1 Order Staying Civil Actions)(Jones, Michael) (Entered: 03/29/2007) 71 NOTICE by Rembrandt Technologies, LP Joint Notice of Conference Regarding Proposed Discovery Order and Docket Control Order (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Discovery Order and Docket Control Order)(Carter, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/30/2007) 72 ORDER granting 69 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages concerning deft's reply memorandum in support of motion to consolidate cases for pretrial proceedings. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 4/2/07. (ehs, ) (Entered: 04/02/2007) 73 REPLY to Response to Motion re 63 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Charter Communications, Inc.,, Charter Communications Operating, LLC, Coxcom, Inc.,. (DeVasto, Diane) (Entered: 04/02/2007) 74 ORDER referring case to Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham in accordance with the assignments made by General Order 07-03. The magistrate judge shall conduct pre-trial proceedings pursuant to 28 USC 636. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 4/2/07. (ch, ) (Entered: 04/03/2007) 75 NOTICE by Rembrandt Technologies, LP NOTICE OF FILING OPPOSITION TO COXCOM'S MOTION FOR TRANSFER AND CONSOLIDATION OF REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP PATENT LITIGATION (Attachments: # 1 Reasons Why Oral Argument Should be Heard in Opposition to CoxCom's Motion for Transfer and Consolidation# 2 Response to CoxCom's Motion for Transfer and Consolidation# 3 Rembrandt's Brief in Opposition to CoxCom's Motion

03/19/2007 03/26/2007

03/29/2007

03/30/2007

04/02/2007

04/02/2007

04/03/2007

04/05/2007

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 17 of 19 Page 17 of 19

for Transfer and Consolidation# 4 Exhibit List# 5 Exhibit 1# 6 Exhibit 2# 7 Exhibit 3# 8 Exhibit 4# 9 Exhibit 5# 10 Exhibit 6# 11 Exhibit 7# 12 Exhibit 8# 13 Exhibit 9# 14 Exhibit 10# 15 Exhibit 11# 16 Exhibit 12# 17 Exhibit 13# 18 Proof of Service)(Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 04/05/2007) 04/12/2007 76 RESPONSE to 65 Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Response to the Motion to Consolidate Cases by Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast Corporation, Comcast of Plano, LP. (Doan, Jennifer) Amended Certificate of Service added on 4/13/2007 (mpv, ). Modified on 4/13/2007 (mpv, ). (Entered: 04/12/2007) 77 SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re 63 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 04/12/2007) 78 NOTICE by Charter Communications, Inc.,, Charter Communications Operating, LLC, Coxcom, Inc., Notice of Development (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Hearing)(Gardner, Allen) (Entered: 04/18/2007) 79 ORDER REGARDING THE PROTECTIVE ORDER AND DOCUMENT PRODUCTION. Signed by Judge Charles Everingham on 4/18/07. (ch, ) (Entered: 04/19/2007) 80 DOCKET CONTROL ORDER Respond to Amendeding Pleadings 11/30/07. Amended Pleadings due by 11/16/2007. Discovery due by 5/14/2008. Joinder of Parties due by 5/3/2007.Claims Construction Hearing set for 2/13/2008 - 2/14/08 9:00 AM before Judge T. John Ward. Motions in limine due by 7/21/2008. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 7/21/2008. Jury Selection set for 8/4/2008 9:00AM before Judge T. John Ward. Pretrial Conference set for 7/24/2008 9:30 AM before Judge T. John Ward. Privilege Logs to be exchanged by parties 6/4/07. All other deadlines are set forth herein. Signed by Judge Charles Everingham on 4/19/07. (ch, ) (Entered: 04/19/2007) 81 NOTICE by Rembrandt Technologies, LP NOTICE REGARDING THE PROTECTIVE ORDER (Attachments: # 1 Attachment A)(Baxter, Samuel) CORRECTED PROPOSED ORDER added on 4/25/2007 (mpv, ). Modified on 4/25/2007 (mpv, ). (Entered: 04/24/2007) 82 NOTICE by Rembrandt Technologies, LP NOTICE REGARDING ELECTRONIC PRODUCTION (Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 04/24/2007) NOTICE re 81 Notice (Other) CORRECTED PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER NOW ATTACHED. (mpv, ) (Entered: 04/25/2007) 83 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Charles Everingham : Scheduling Conference held on 4/30/2007. (Court Reporter Debbie Latham.)(delat, ) (Entered: 04/30/2007) TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on 4/3/07 before Judge Chad Everingham. Court Reporter: Transcriber/Susan Simmons. (lss) (Entered:

04/12/2007

04/18/2007

04/19/2007

04/19/2007

04/24/2007

04/24/2007 04/25/2007

04/30/2007

05/03/2007

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 18 of 19 Page 18 of 19

05/03/2007) 05/03/2007 85 NOTICE by Rembrandt Technologies, LP PLAINTIFF REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP'S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH PATENT RULES 3-1 AND 3-2 (Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 05/03/2007) 86 NOTICE by Charter Communications, Inc.,, Charter Communications Operating, LLC of Disclosures (Gardner, Allen) (Entered: 05/03/2007) 87 NOTICE of Disclosure by Coxcom, Inc.,, Coxcom, Inc.,, Coxcom, Inc., Notice of Service of Initial Disclosures (Stockwell, Mitchell) (Entered: 05/04/2007) 88 NOTICE of Disclosure by Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 05/04/2007) 89 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Charles Everingham on 5/4/07. (ehs, ) (Entered: 05/04/2007) 90 NOTICE of Disclosure by Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 05/18/2007) 91 Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct the Docket Control Order to Move the Date for Exchanging Privilege Logs by Rembrandt Technologies, LP. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Carter, Jeffrey) (Entered: 06/04/2007) 92 ORDER granting 91 Motion to Amend/Correct. Docket Control Order is amended to move the date for parties to exchange privilege logs to 7/10/07. Signed by Judge Charles Everingham on 6/5/07. (ch, ) (Entered: 06/06/2007) 93 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Thomas Guy Fasone, III on behalf of Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Fasone, Thomas) (Entered: 06/08/2007) 94 NOTICE of Disclosure by Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Baxter, Samuel) (Entered: 06/12/2007) 95 NOTICE of Disclosure by Charter Communications, Inc.,, Charter Communications Operating, LLC P.R. 3-3 and P.R. 3-4 (Gardner, Allen) (Entered: 06/14/2007) 96 NOTICE of Disclosure by Coxcom, Inc., P.R. 3-3 and P.R. 3-4 (Gardner, Allen) (Entered: 06/14/2007) 97 NOTICE by All Defendants of Multi-District Litigation Developments Pursuant to Local Rule CV-42 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Gardner, Allen) (Entered: 06/21/2007) 98 Interdistrict transfer to the District of Delaware, Wilmington, De. Purusant to letter Elizabeth Dinan was notified. Certified copy of Docket Sheet, Complaint, Transfer Order and Letter were mailed to the Federal Blding, Lockbox 18, 844 N. King Street Wilmington, DE(ch, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 6/28/2007 (ch, ). Modified on 6/28/2007 (ch, ). (Entered: 06/27/2007)

05/03/2007 05/04/2007

05/04/2007 05/04/2007 05/18/2007 06/04/2007

06/06/2007

06/08/2007 06/12/2007 06/14/2007

06/14/2007 06/21/2007

06/27/2007

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txed - Docket Report Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 19 of 19 Page 19 of 19

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
07/02/2007 13:26:08 PACER Login: Description: ud0037 Docket Report Client Code: Search Criteria: Cost: 2:06-cv-00223-TJWCE 0.80

Billable Pages: 10

https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?113886844695837-L_923_0-1

7/2/2007

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104-2 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 67

Filed 03/14/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 1 of 22 Page 1 of 22

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP V. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ET AL. § § § § § §

CIVIL NO. 2:06-CV-223(TJW)

NOTICE OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, PROPOSED DEADLINES FOR DOCKET CONTROL ORDER AND DISCOVERY ORDER The court, sua sponte, issues this Notice of Scheduling Conference, Proposed Deadlines for Docket Control Order and Discovery Order. Notice of Scheduling Conference Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 and Local Rule CV-16, the Scheduling Conference in this case is set for April 3, 2007, at 2:00 p.m. in Marshall, Texas. The parties are directed to meet and confer in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) prior to the conference. The parties are excused from the requirement of filing a written proposed discovery plan in this case. Proposed Deadlines for Docket Control Order The proposed deadlines for docket control order set forth in the attached Appendix A shall be discussed at the Scheduling Conference. The court will not modify the proposed trial date except for good cause shown. Discovery Order After a review of the pleaded claims and defenses in this action and in furtherance of the management of the court's docket under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, it is ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Disclosures. Except as provided by paragraph 1(h), and, to the extent not already disclosed,

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104-2 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 67

Filed 03/14/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 2 of 22 Page 2 of 22

within thirty (30) days after the Scheduling Conference, each party shall disclose to every other party the following information: (a) (b) (c) the correct names of the parties to the lawsuit; the name, address, and telephone number of any potential parties; the legal theories and, in general, the factual bases of the disclosing party's claims or defenses (the disclosing party need not marshal all evidence that may be offered at trial); (d) the name, address, and telephone number of persons having knowledge of relevant facts, a brief statement of each identified person's connection with the case, and a brief, fair summary of the substance of the information known by any such person; (e) any indemnity and insuring agreements under which any person or entity carrying on an insurance business may be liable to satisfy part or all of a judgment entered in this action or to indemnify or reimburse for payments made to satisfy the judgment; (f) (g) (h) any settlement agreements relevant to the subject matter of this action; any statement of any party to the litigation; for any testifying expert, by the date set by the court in the Docket Control Order, each party shall disclose to the other party or parties: a. b. c. the expert's name, address, and telephone number; the subject matter on which the expert will testify; if the witness is retained or specially employed to provide expert testimony in the case or whose duties as an employee of the disclosing party regularly involve giving expert testimony: (a) all documents, tangible things, reports, models, or data compilations

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104-2 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 67

Filed 03/14/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 3 of 22 Page 3 of 22

that have been provided to, reviewed by, or prepared by or for the expert in anticipation of the expert's testimony; and (b) the disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B) and Local Rule CV-26. d. for all other experts, the general substance of the expert's mental impressions and opinions and a brief summary of the basis for them or documents reflecting such information; Any party may move to modify these disclosures for good cause shown. 2. Protective Orders. Upon the request of any party before or after the Scheduling

Conference, the court shall issue the Protective Order in the form attached as Appendix B. Any party may oppose the issuance of or move to modify the terms of the Protective Order for good cause. 3. Additional Disclosures. In addition to the disclosures required in Paragraph 1 of this Order, at the Scheduling Conference, the court shall amend this discovery order and require each party, without awaiting a discovery request, to provide, to the extent not already provided, to every other party the following: (a) (b) the disclosures required by the Patent Rules for the Eastern District of Texas; within forty-five (45) days after the Scheduling Conference, a copy of all documents, data compilations, and tangible things in the possession, custody, or control of the party that are relevant to the case, except to the extent these disclosures are affected by the time limits set forth in the Patent Rules for the Eastern District of Texas. By written agreement of all parties, alternative forms of disclosure may be provided in lieu of paper copies. For example, the parties may agree to exchange images of

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104-2 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 67

Filed 03/14/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 4 of 22 Page 4 of 22

documents electronically or by means of computer disk; or the parties may agree to review and copy disclosure materials at the offices of the attorneys representing the parties instead of requiring each side to furnish paper copies of the disclosure materials; (c) within forty-five (45) days after the Scheduling Conference, a complete computation of any category of damages claimed by any party to the action, making available for inspection and copying as under Rule 34, the documents or other evidentiary material on which such computation is based, including materials bearing on the nature and extent of injuries suffered; and (d) within forty-five (45) days after the Scheduling Conference, those documents and authorizations described in Local Rule CV-34; and The court shall order these disclosures in the absence of a showing of good cause by any party objecting to such disclosures. 4. Discovery Limitations. At the Scheduling Conference, the court shall also amend this discovery order to limit discovery in this cause to the disclosures described in Paragraphs 1 and 3 together with 60 interrogatories, 60 requests for admissions, the depositions of the parties, depositions on written questions of custodians of business records for third parties, depositions of three (3) expert witnesses per side and forty (40) hours of additional depositions per side. "Side" means a party or a group of parties with a common interest. Any party may move to modify these limitations for good cause. 5. Privileged Information. There is no duty to disclose privileged documents or information. However, the parties are directed to meet and confer concerning privileged documents or information after the Scheduling Conference. Within sixty (60) days after the Scheduling

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104-2 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 67

Filed 03/14/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 5 of 22 Page 5 of 22

Conference, the parties shall exchange privilege logs identifying the documents or information and the basis for any disputed claim of privilege in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, with enable the other parties to assess the applicability of the privilege or protection. Any party may move the court for an order compelling the production of any documents or information identified on any other party's privilege log. If such a motion is made, the party asserting privilege shall respond to the motion within the time period provided by Local Rule CV-7. The party asserting privilege shall then file with the Court within thirty (30) days of the filing of the motion to compel any proof in the form of declarations or affidavits to support their assertions of privilege, along with the documents over which privilege is asserted for in camera inspection. If the parties have no disputes concerning privileged documents or information, then the parties shall inform the court of that fact within sixty (60) days after the Scheduling Conference. 6. Pre-trial disclosures. Absent a showing of good cause by any party, the court shall require the following additional disclosures: Each party shall provide to every other party regarding the evidence that the disclosing party may present at trial as follows: (a) The name and, if not previously provided, the address and telephone number, of each witness, separately identifying those whom the party expects to present at trial and those whom the party may call if the need arises. (b) The designation of those witnesses whose testimony is expected to be presented by means of a deposition and, if not taken stenographically, a transcript of the pertinent portions of the deposition testimony. (c) An appropriate identification of each document or other exhibit, including summaries

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104-2 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 67

Filed 03/14/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 6 of 22 Page 6 of 22

of other evidence, separately identifying those which the party expects to offer and those which the party may offer if the need arises. Unless otherwise directed by the court, these disclosures shall be made at least 30 days before trial. Within 14 days thereafter, unless a different time is specified by the court, a party may serve and file a list disclosing (1) any objections to the use under Rule 32(a) of a deposition designated by another party under subparagraph (B), and (2) any objections, together with the grounds therefor, that may be made to the admissibility of materials identified under subparagraph (c). Objections not so disclosed, other than objections under Rules 402 and 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, shall be deemed waived unless excused by the court for good cause shown. 7. Signature. The disclosures required by this order shall be made in writing and signed by the party or counsel and shall constitute a certification that, to the best of the signer's knowledge, information and belief, such disclosure is complete and correct as of the time it is made. If feasible, counsel shall meet to exchange disclosures required by this order; otherwise, such disclosures shall be served as provided by Fed. R. Civ. P. 5. The parties shall promptly file a notice with the court that the disclosures required under this order have taken place. 8. Duty to Supplement. After disclosure is made pursuant to this order, each party is under a duty to supplement or correct its disclosures immediately if the party obtains information on the basis of which it knows that the information disclosed was either incomplete or incorrect when made, or is no longer complete or true. 9. Disputes. (a) Except in cases involving claims of privilege, any party entitled to receive disclosures may, after the deadline for making disclosures, serve upon a party required to make

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104-2 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 67

Filed 03/14/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 7 of 22 Page 7 of 22

disclosures a written statement, in letter form or otherwise, of any reason why the party entitled to receive disclosures believes that the disclosures are insufficient. The written statement shall list, by category, the items the party entitled to receive disclosures contends should be produced. The parties shall promptly meet and confer. If the parties are unable to resolve their dispute, then the party required to make disclosures shall, within fourteen (14) days after service of the written statement upon it, serve upon the party entitled to receive disclosures a written statement, in letter form or otherwise, which identifies (1) the requested items that will be disclosed, if any, and (2) the reasons why any requested items will not be disclosed. The party entitled to receive disclosures may thereafter file a motion to compel. (b) Counsel are directed to contact the chambers of the undersigned for any "hot-line" disputes before contacting the Discovery Hotline provided by Local Rule CV-26(e). If the undersigned is not available, the parties shall proceed in accordance with Local Rule CV-26(e). 10. No Excuses. A party is not excused from the requirements of this Discovery Order because it has not fully completed its investigation of the case, or because it challenges the sufficiency of another party's disclosures, or because another party has not made its disclosures. Absent court order to the contrary, a party is not excused from disclosure because there are pending motions to dismiss, to remand or to change venue. 11. Filings. Any filings in excess of twenty (20) pages, counsel is directed to provide a courtesy copy to Chambers, simultaneously with the date of filing.

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104-2 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 67

Filed 03/14/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 8 of 22 Page 8 of 22

12.

Modifications to Patent Rules. The attached Appendix C applies to this case and supplements the Patent Rules for the Eastern District of Texas. These modifications are not intended to apply to any other case except as may be expressly provided by order of this Court.

SIGNED this 14th day of March, 2007.

__________________________________________ T. JOHN WARD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104-2 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 67

Filed 03/14/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 9 of 22 Page 9 of 22

APPENDIX A

PROPOSED DEADLINES FOR DOCKET CONTROL ORDER

PROPOSED DEADLINES TO BE DISCUSSED AT THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE APRIL 3, 2007

Monday, August 4, 2008

Jury Selection - 9:00 a.m. in Marshall, Texas

July 24, 2008

Pretrial Conference - 9:30 a.m. in Marshall, Texas

July 21, 2008

Joint Pretrial Order, Joint Proposed Jury Instructions and Form of the Verdict.

July 21, 2008

Motions in Limine (due three days before final Pre-Trial Conference). Three (3) days prior to the pre-trial conference provided for herein, the parties shall furnish a copy of their respective Motions in Limine to the Court by facsimile transmission, 903/935-2295. The parties are directed to confer and advise the Court on or before 3:00 o'clock p.m. the day before the pre-trial conference which paragraphs are agreed to and those that need to be addressed at the pre-trial conference. The parties shall limit their motions in limine to those issues which, if improperly introduced into the trial of the cause, would be so prejudicial that the Court could not alleviate the prejudice with appropriate instruction(s). Response to Dispositive Motions (including Daubert motions) Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real Time Reporting of Court Proceedings. If a daily transcript or real time reporting of court proceedings is requested for trial, the party or parties making said request shall file a notice with the Court and e-mail the Court Reporter, Susan Simmons, at [email protected].

July 7, 2008

July 7, 2008

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104-2 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 67

Filed 03/14/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 10 of 22 Page 10 of 22

June 20, 2008

For Filing Dispositive Motions and any other motions that may require a hearing (including Daubert motions) Responses to dispositive motions filed prior to the dispositive motion deadline, including Daubert Motions, shall be due in accordance with Local Rule CV-7(e). Motions for Summary Judgment shall comply with Local Rule CV56.

May 21, 2008

Defendant to Identify Trial Witnesses

May 7, 2008

Plaintiff to Identify Trial Witnesses

May 7, 2008

Discovery Deadline

30 Days after claim construction ruling Designate Rebuttal Expert Witnesses other than claims construction Expert witness report due Refer to Discovery Order for required information.

15 Days after claim construction ruling Comply with P.R. 3-8.

15 Days after claim construction ruling Party with the burden of proof to designate Expert Witnesses other than claims construction Expert witness report due Refer to Discovery Order for required information.

February 6, 2008

Claim construction hearing 9:00 a.m., Marshall, Texas.

January 14, 2008

Comply with P.R. 4-5(c).

January 7, 2008

Comply with P.R. 4-5(b).

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104-2 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 67

Filed 03/14/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 11 of 22 Page 11 of 22

December 24, 2007

Comply with P.R. 4-5(a).

November 30, 2007

Discovery deadline­claims construction issues

November 23, 2007

Respond to Amended Pleadings

November 9, 2007

Amend Pleadings (It is not necessary to file a Motion for Leave to Amend before the deadline to amend pleadings except to the extent the amendment seeks to add a new patent in suit. It is necessary to file a Motion for Leave to Amend after November 9, 2007).

November 9, 2007

Comply with P.R. 4-3.

October 9, 2007

Comply with P.R. 4-2.

September 19, 2007

Comply with P.R. 4-1.

May 18, 2007

Comply with P.R. 3-3.

June 4, 2007

Privilege Logs to be exchanged by parties (or a letter to the Court stating that there are no disputes as to claims of privileged documents).

May 3, 2007

Join Additional Parties

April 13, 2007

Comply with P.R. 3-1

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104-2 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 67

Filed 03/14/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 12 of 22 Page 12 of 22

To be discussed at Scheduling Conference

Mediation to be completed If the parties agree that mediation is an option, the Court will appoint a mediator or the parties will mutually agree upon a mediator. If the parties choose the mediator, they are to inform the Court by letter the name and address of the mediator. The courtroom deputy will immediately mail out a "mediation packet" to the mediator for the case. The mediator shall be deemed to have agreed to the terms of Court Ordered Mediation Plan of the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Texas by going forth with the mediation. General Order 99-2. Scheduling Conference (All attorneys are directed to Local Rule CV-16 for scope of the Scheduling Conference).

April 3, 2007

The parties are directed to Local Rule CV-7(d), which provides in part that "[i]n the event a party fails to oppose a motion in the manner prescribed herein the court will assume that the party has no opposition." Local Rule CV-7(e) provides that a party opposing a motion has 12 days, in addition to any added time permitted under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(e), in which to serve and file a response and any supporting documents, after which the court will consider the submitted motion for decision.

OTHER LIMITATIONS 1. All depositions to be read into evidence as part of the parties' case-in-chief shall be EDITED so as to exclude all unnecessary, repetitious, and irrelevant testimony; ONLY those portions which are relevant to the issues in controversy shall be read into evidence. The Court will refuse to entertain any motion to compel discovery filed after the date of this Order unless the movant advises the Court within the body of the motion that counsel for the parties have first conferred in a good faith attempt to resolve the matter. See Eastern District of Texas Local Rule CV-7(h). The following excuses will not warrant a continuance nor justify a failure to comply with the discovery deadline: (a) The fact that there are motions for summary judgment or motions to dismiss pending;

2.

3.

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104-2 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 67

Filed 03/14/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 13 of 22 Page 13 of 22

(b)

The fact that one or more of the attorneys is set for trial in another court on the same day, unless the other setting was made prior to the date of this order or was made as a special provision for the parties in the other case; The failure to complete discovery prior to trial, unless the parties can demonstrate that it was impossible to complete discovery despite their good faith effort to do so.

(c)

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104-2 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 67

Filed 03/14/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 14 of 22 Page 14 of 22

APPENDIX B

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP V. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ET AL. § § § § § §

CIVIL NO. 2:06-CV-223(TJW)

STANDARD PROTECTIVE ORDER The Court, sua sponte, issues this Protective Order to facilitate document disclosure and production under the Local Rules of this Court and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Unless modified pursuant to the terms contained in this Order, this Order shall remain in effect through the conclusion of this litigation. In support of this order, the court finds that: 1. Documents or information containing confidential proprietary and business information

and/or trade secrets ("Confidential Information") that bear significantly on the parties' claims or defenses is likely to be disclosed or produced during the course of discovery in this litigation; 2. The parties to this litigation may assert that public dissemination and disclosure of

Confidential Information could severely injure or damage the party disclosing or producing the Confidential Information and could place that party at a competitive disadvantage; 3. Counsel for the party or parties receiving Confidential Information are presently without

sufficient information to accept the representation(s) made by the party or parties producing Confidential Information as to the confidential, proprietary, and/or trade secret nature of such

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104-2 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 67

Filed 03/14/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 15 of 22 Page 15 of 22

Confidential Information; and 4. To protect the respective interests of the parties and to facilitate the progress of disclosure

and discovery in this case, the following Order should issue: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Documents or discovery responses containing Confidential Information disclosed or produced by any party in this litigation are referred to as "Protected Documents." Except as otherwise indicated below, all documents or discovery responses designated by the producing party as "Confidential" and which are disclosed or produced to the attorney's for the other parties to this litigation are Protected Documents and are entitled to confidential treatment as described below. 2. Protected Documents shall not include (a) advertising materials, (b) materials that on their face show that they have been published to the general public, or (c) documents that have submitted to any governmental entity without request for confidential treatment. 3. At any time after the delivery of Protected Documents, counsel for the party or parties receiving the Protected Documents may challenge the Confidential designation of all or any portion thereof by providing written notice thereof to counsel for the party disclosing or producing the Protected Documents. If the parties are unable to agree as to whether the confidential designation of discovery material is appropriate, the party or parties receiving the Protected Documents shall certify to the Court that the parties cannot reach an agreement as to the confidential nature of all or a portion of the Protected Documents. Thereafter, the party or parties disclosing or producing the Protected Documents shall have ten (10) days from the date of certification to file a motion for protective order with regard to any Protected Documents in dispute. The party or parties producing the Protected Documents shall have

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104-2 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 67

Filed 03/14/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 16 of 22 Page 16 of 22

the burden of establishing that the disputed Protected Documents are entitled to confidential treatment. If the party or parties producing the Protected Documents do not timely file a motion for protective order, then the Protected Documents in dispute shall no longer be subject to confidential treatment as provided in this Order. All Protected Documents are entitled to confidential treatment pursuant to the terms of this Order until and unless the parties formally agree in writing to the contrary, a party fails to timely move for a protective order, or a contrary determination is made by the Court as to whether all or a portion of a Protected Document is entitled to confidential treatment. 4. Confidential Treatment. Protected Documents and any information contained therein shall not be used or shown, disseminated, copied, or in any way communicated to anyone for any purpose whatsoever, except as provided for below. 5. Protected Documents and any information contained therein shall be disclosed only to the following persons ("Qualified Persons"): (a) Counsel of record in this action for the party or party receiving Protected Documents or any information contained therein; Employees of such counsel (excluding experts and investigators) assigned to and necessary to assist such counsel in the preparation and trial of this action; and The Court.

(b)

(c)

Protected Documents and any information contained therein shall be used solely for the prosecution of this litigation. 6. Counsel of record for the party or parties receiving Protected Documents may create an index of the Protected Documents and furnish it to attorneys of record representing or having represented parties involved in litigation involving the claims alleged in this suit against the party or parties disclosing or producing the Protected Documents. The index may only

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104-2 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 67

Filed 03/14/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 17 of 22 Page 17 of 22

identify the document, date, author, and general subject matter of any Protected Document, but may not reveal the substance of any such document. Counsel for the party or parties receiving Protected Documents shall maintain a current log of the names and addresses of persons to whom the index was furnished. 7. The term "copy" as used herein means any photographic, mechanical or computerized copy or reproduction of any document or thing, or any verbatim transcript, in whole or in part, of such document or thing. 8. To the extent that Protected Documents or information contained therein are used in depositions, at hearings, or at trial, such documents or information shall remain subject to the provisions of this Order, along with the transcript pages of the deposition testimony and/or trial testimony referring to the Protected Documents or information contained therein. 9. Any court reporter or transcriber who reports or transcribes testimony in this action shall agree that all "confidential" information designated as such under this Order shall remain "confidential" and shall not be disclosed by them, except pursuant to the terms of this Order, and that any notes or transcriptions of such testimony (and any accompanying exhibits) will be retained by the reporter or delivered to counsel of record. 10. Inadvertent or unintentional production of documents or information containing Confidential Information which are not designated "confidential" shall not be deemed a waiver in whole or in part of a claim for confidential treatment. 11. The party or parties receiving Protected Documents shall not under any circumstances sell, offer for sale, advertise, or publicize Protected Documents or any information contained therein. 12. After termination of this litigation, the provisions of this Order shall continue to be binding,

Case 1:07-cv-00400-GMS Document 104-2 Case 2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE Document 67

Filed 03/14/2007 Filed 06/28/2007

Page 18 of 22 Page 18 of 22

except with respect to those documents and information that become a matter of public record. This Court retains and shall have continuing jurisdiction over the parties and recipients of the Protected Documents for enforcement of the provisions of this Order following termination of this litigation. 13. Upon termination of this action by dismissal, judgment, or settlement, counsel for the party or parties receiving Protected Documents shall return the Protected Documents to the counsel for the party or parties disclosing or producing the Protected Documents. The party or parties receiving the Protected Documents shall keep their attorney work product which refers or relates to any Protected Documents. Attorney work product may be used in subsequent litigation provided that such use does not disclose Protected Documents or any information contained therein. 14. This Order shall be binding upon the parties and their attorneys, successors, executors, personal representatives, administrators, heirs, legal representatives, assigns, subsidiaries, divisions, employees, agents, independent contractors, or other persons or organizations over which they have control. 15. The Court anticipates and encourages the parties to file a motion to modify the terms hereof with respect to the sharing of Protected Documents with experts and consultants; shifting the cost burden of production equitably; and other terms that may be reasonably required to protect a pa