Free Answer to Complaint - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 17.9 kB
Pages: 6
Date: August 13, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 854 Words, 5,615 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/38632/3.pdf

Download Answer to Complaint - District Court of Delaware ( 17.9 kB)


Preview Answer to Complaint - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:07-cv-00453-SLR

Document 3

Filed 08/13/2007

Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

MICHELE HARRIS Plaintiff, v. WILMINGTON TRUST CORPORATION, Defendant.

) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 07-453-SLR ) ) Jury Trial Demanded ) ) )

ANSWER 1. 2. No answer necessary. Defendant does not have sufficient information to admit or deny the

allegations of this averment. 3. 4. Admitted. Admitted that the claim is purported to be based on the FMLA; denied that

any violation of the FMLA has occurred or that this Court has jurisdiction over any of the other claims sought to be brought. 5. 6. Denied that this court has jurisdiction over the alleged state law claims. Denied that Plaintiff is entitled to invoke the doctrine of pendent and

supplemental jurisdiction. For a further answer, Defendant alleges that on information and belief, Plaintiff failed to file charges of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Delaware State Department of Labor, and has no notice of right to sue from either agency.

DB02:6175266.1

044203.1026

Case 1:07-cv-00453-SLR

Document 3

Filed 08/13/2007

Page 2 of 6

7. basis for that relief. 8. 9. 10. 11.

Admitted that the claimed relief is being sought. Denied that there is any

Admitted. Admitted. Admitted. Admitted that Plaintiff received an award in 2004 and was usually rated

competent or satisfactory in performance. For a further answer, Plaintiff had continual attendance problems that ultimately resulted in her termination. 12. 13. Admitted. Defendant does not have sufficient information to admit or deny the

allegations of this averment. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied. Admitted that Plaintiff was confused about the attendance policy. Denied

that Defendant did not follow the policy. 21. Defendant does not have sufficient information to admit or deny the

allegations of this averment. 22. Defendant does not have sufficient information to admit or deny the

allegations of this averment.

2
DB02:6175266.1 044203.1026

Case 1:07-cv-00453-SLR

Document 3

Filed 08/13/2007

Page 3 of 6

23. 24. 25.

Admitted. Admitted. Admitted that Plaintiff was terminated on May 15, 2006. For a further

answer Plaintiff was terminated for having violated the attendance policy repeatedly, resulting in nine (9) occurrences, most of which took place after weekends or holidays. 26. 27. Otherwise denied. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. Admitted. Admitted. Admitted. Admitted. Defendant does not have sufficient information to admit or deny the Denied. Admitted that after the termination, Plaintiff's doctor wrote a note.

allegations of this averment. 33. 34. Denied. Defendant repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1

through 33 of its Answer. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. Admitted. Admitted. Denied. Denied. Defendant repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1

through 38 of its Answer.

3
DB02:6175266.1 044203.1026

Case 1:07-cv-00453-SLR

Document 3

Filed 08/13/2007

Page 4 of 6

40. 41. 42. 43.

Denied. Denied. Denied. Defendant repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1

through 42 of its Answer. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied. Defendant repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1

through 47 of its Answer. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied. Defendant repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1

through 52 of its Answer. 54. 55. 56. 57. Denied. Denied. Denied. Denied AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 58. Plaintiff has failed to state claims upon relief can be granted.

4
DB02:6175266.1 044203.1026

Case 1:07-cv-00453-SLR

Document 3

Filed 08/13/2007

Page 5 of 6

59.

Upon information and relief, Plaintiff has not filed a charge of

discrimination or retaliation with either the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or the State of Delaware Department of Labor, and has not attached a Notice of Right to Sue to the Complaint, as a result of which the Court does not have jurisdiction over Counts II, III and IV. 60. This Court does not have jurisdiction over Count V because the Delaware

General Assembly has specifically declared that the Delaware discrimination statutes constitute the exclusive remedy for claims such as that sought to be made by Plaintiff. 61. To the extent that Plaintiff's Complaint was not filed within 90 days of

receipt of a Notice of Right to Sue, all claims arising out of the underlying charge are time barred. 62. To the extent Plaintiff has failed to mitigate her damages, she is barred

from recovering from Defendant. 63. To the extent the Complaint is based upon conduct that is not the subject

of a timely filed charge of discrimination, Plaintiff's claims are barred for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. 64. amounts authorized. 65. rights of Plaintiff. WHEREFORE, Defendant demands that the Complaint be dismissed and that attorneys' fees and costs be assessed against Plaintiff. Defendant denies that it acted with malice or reckless indifference to the Any compensatory or punitive damages claimed are limited to the

YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP

5
DB02:6175266.1 044203.1026

Case 1:07-cv-00453-SLR

Document 3

Filed 08/13/2007

Page 6 of 6

s/ Sheldon N. Sandler Sheldon N. Sandler, Esquire (No. 245) The Brandywine Building, 17th Floor 1000 West Street P.O. Box 391, Wilmington, Delaware 19899-0391 Telephone: (302) 571-6673 Facsimile: (302) 576-3330 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant DATED: August 13, 2007

6
DB02:6175266.1 044203.1026