Free Stipulation - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 96.0 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 484 Words, 3,091 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/38631/83.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of Delaware ( 96.0 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :07-cv-00457-SLR Document 83 Filed 08/1 1/2008 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
)
CANCER RESEARCH )
TECHNOLOGY LIMITED and )
SCHERING CORPORATION, )
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. O'/—457 (SLR)
)
BARR LABORATORIES, INC. AND )
BARR RHARMACEUTICALS, INC., )
)
Defendants. )

STIPULATION REGARDING THE DEPOSITIONS OF
EDWARD LUNT, KENNETH WOOLDRIDGE, SUSAN FODEN AND TERRY MILLER
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 29, plaintiffs Cancer Research Technology Limited and
Schering Corporation and defendants Barr Laboratories, inc. and Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(collectively “the parties") hereby stipulate as follows:
. 1. Plaintiffs will make Edward Lunt, Kenneth R. H. Wooldridge, Terry Miller and
Susan Foden available for depositions in the United Kingdom on dates to be determined by the
parties.
2. The aforementioned depositions will be taken in accordance with the Federal
- Rules of Civil Procedure.
Z 3. The parties waive the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 28 & 30(b)(5). However,
the parties agree that the court reporter shall administer the same oath or affirmation as if the
deposition were taken in the United States, and that no objections shall be made by the parties or
witnesses to the competency of the court reporter to administer such an oath or affirmation or to
the competency ofthe videographer based upon their citizenship or accreditation.

Case 1 :07-cv-00457-SLR Document 83 Filed 08/1 1/2008 Page 2 of 2
4. The parties also agree that Drs. Lunt, Wooldridge, Foden, and Mr. Miller will be
required to testify truthfully and under oath or affirmation, punishable by perjury under any
applicable law in the United Kingdom, and Plaintiffs will not argue that such testimony is
insufficient for use at trial in the United States.
5. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 29, the aforementioned depositions "may be used in
the same way as any other deposition” and the parties expressly waive any objections to the
admissibility of the any ofthe testimony of Drs. Lunt, Wooldridge, Foden and Mr. Miller based
upon the fact that the depositions were taken outside the United States.
Dated: August 11, 2008
Agreed:
/s/ Rodger D. Smith, ll /s/ Brian E. Farnan
Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014) John C. Phillips, Jr. (#110)
Rodger D. Smith ll (#3778) Brian E. Faman (#4089)
Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnel} LLP Phillips, Goldman & Spence, P.A.
1201 N. Market Street 1200 North Broorn Street
Wilmington, DE 19899-—l347 Wilmington, DE 19806
(302) 65 8—9200 (302) 65 5 -4200
Jesse J. Jenner George C. Lombardi
Denise L. Loring Taras A. Gracey
Christopher J. Harnett Ivan M. Poullaos
Matthew A. Traupman J ulia Mano Johnson
ROPES & GRAY LLP WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
1211 Avenue ofthe Americas 35 West Wacker Drive
New York, New York 10036 Chicago, IL 60601
(212) 5963000 (312) 5 58-5600
Attorneys for Plaintwfs Attorneys for Defendants
Cancer Research Technology Limited and Barr Laboratories, Inc. and Barr
Schering Corporation Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- SO ORDERED this day of , 2008.
The Honorable Sue L. Robinson