Free Motion to Continue - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :07-cr-00115-SLR Document 23 Filed 01/14/2008 Page 1 of 3
lN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, :
Plaintiff,
v. Criminal Action No. 07-l l5 SLR
CHARLES A. WEBSTER,
Defendant.
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
The United States, by and through Colm F. Connolly, United States Attorney for the
District of Delaware, and Douglas E. McCann, Assistant United States Attorney for the District
of Delaware, hereby moves the Court to continue the scheduling conference in the above-
captioned case for the reasons set forth below.
l. The Court has set a scheduling conference for January 15, 2008.
2. The parties believe this case might resolve pre-trial, and seek an additional sixty days to
continue their discussions.
3. The defendant, through counsel, has represented to the government that he does not
oppose this motion and does not obj ect to the exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act
between January 15, 2008 and the new date for the scheduling conference.

Case 1:O7—cr—OO115-SLR Document 23 Filed O1/14/2008 Page 2 of 3
WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully asks the Court to continue the January 15,
2008, scheduling conference for about sixty days, and to exclude the intervening time under the
Speedy Trial Act in the interests of justice.
Respectfully submitted,
COLM F. CONNOLLY
United States Attomey
alg- L
ougl E. McCann
Assistant United States Attorney
1007 Orange Street, Suite 700
P.O. Box 2046
Wilmington, Delaware 19899-2046
DATED: January 14, 2008
2

Case 1:O7—cr—OO115-SLR Document 23 Filed O1/14/2008 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, :
Plaintiff,
v. Criminal Action No. 07-1 15 SLR
CHARLES A. WEBSTER,
Defendant.
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this _ day of , 2008, that
1. The govemment’s Unopposed Motion to Continue Scheduling Conference is
GRANTED;
2. A telephonic scheduling conference in this matter will be held on the 17th day of
March, 2008, at 10:00 a.m.;
3. The Court finds that the possibility that a short continuance might allow this case
to resolve without the need for a trial outweighs the public and defendant’s
interest in a speedy trial, and excludes the time between January 15, 2008, and
March 17, 2008 under the Speedy Trial Act in the interest of justice.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cr-00115-SLR

Document 23

Filed 01/14/2008

Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cr-00115-SLR

Document 23

Filed 01/14/2008

Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cr-00115-SLR

Document 23

Filed 01/14/2008

Page 3 of 3