Free Motion to Continue - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:07-cr-00115-SLR

Document 21

Filed 12/14/2007

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES A. WEBSTER, Defendant. : : : : : : : : :

Criminal Action No. 07-115 SLR

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE The United States, by and through Colm F. Connolly, United States Attorney for the District of Delaware, and Douglas E. McCann, Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Delaware, hereby moves the Court to continue the scheduling conference in the abovecaptioned case for the reasons set forth below. 1. 2. The Court has set a scheduling conference for December 17, 2007. The parties believe this case might resolve pre-trial, and seek an additional thirty days to

continue their discussions. 3. The defendant, through counsel, has represented to the government that he does not

oppose this motion and does not object to the exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act between December 17, 2007 and the new date for the scheduling conference.

Case 1:07-cr-00115-SLR

Document 21

Filed 12/14/2007

Page 2 of 3

WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully asks the Court to continue the December 17, 2007, scheduling conference for about thirty days, and to exclude the intervening time under the Speedy Trial Act in the interests of justice.

Respectfully submitted, COLM F. CONNOLLY United States Attorney

By: /s/ Douglas E. McCann Douglas E. McCann Assistant United States Attorney 1007 Orange Street, Suite 700 P.O. Box 2046 Wilmington, Delaware 19899-2046

DATED:

December 14, 2007

2

Case 1:07-cr-00115-SLR

Document 21

Filed 12/14/2007

Page 3 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES A. WEBSTER, Defendant. : : : : : : : : :

Criminal Action No. 07-115 SLR

ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this ___ day of _____________________, 2007, that 1. The government's Unopposed Motion to Continue Scheduling Conference is GRANTED; 2. A telephonic scheduling conference in this matter will be held on the _____ day of ___________________ at ________.m.; 3. The Court finds that the possibility that a short continuance might allow this case to resolve without the need for a trial outweighs the public and defendant's interest in a speedy trial, and excludes the time between December 17, 2007, and the date specified in paragraph 2 above under the Speedy Trial Act in the interest of justice.

__________________________________ HONORABLE SUE L. ROBINSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE