Free Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 97.1 kB
Pages: 4
Date: September 6, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 759 Words, 4,631 Characters
Page Size: 613 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/39435/16.pdf

Download Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - District Court of Delaware ( 97.1 kB)


Preview Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - District Court of Delaware
I Case 1 :07-cv—00809-JJ F—LPS Document 16 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, )
2 ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED, )
Q IPR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., and )
SHIONOGI SEIYAKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA, )
)
Plaintiffs, ) C.A. N0. 07-809-JJF
)
v. )
1 )
APOTEX INC., and APOTEX CORP., )
I )
Defendants. )
APOTEX CORPRS MOTION TO DISMISS
Defendant Apotex Corp. hereby moves, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. l2(b)(6), to dismiss
Count I ofthe complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, because
Apotex Corp. is not the party who tiled the Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA") at
issue in this case, and under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(A), only the entity that submits the ANDA
I can be sued for infringement under that section.
L Apotex Corp. also moves to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), because there is
no case or controversy between Plaintiffs and Defendants under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), and any
cause of action based on the preparation and tiling of and ANDA at issue in this case is limited
l to a claim for infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 27l(e)(2)(A). See 35 U.S.C. § 271(3)(l).
Finally, in the event that Apotex Inc.’s contemporaneoasly tiled Rule 12(b)(2) motion to
dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is granted, Apotex Corp. moves to dismiss under Fed. R.
Civ. P. l2(b)(7) because Apotex inc. is an indispensable party and dismissal would be
appropriate under Fed. R. Civ. P. l9(b).
A memorandum in support of this Motion is tiled herewith.

Case 1 :07-cv—00809-JJF—LPS Document 16 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 2 of 3
POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
( OP COUNSEL:
By: /S/ Richard L. Horwitz
, Robert B. Breisblatt Richard L. Horwitz (#2246)
J. Aron Carnahan Kenneth L. Dorsney (#3 726)
1 Laurie A. Haynie Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor
l Welsh & Katz Ltd. 1313 N. Market Street
120 S. Riverside Plaza Wilmington, DE 19899
22nd Floor Tel: (302) 984-6000
Chicago, IL 60606 rhorwitz@_tg0ttera11derso11.com
; Tel: (312) 655-1500 kdoxsmey @,po¤exanderson.com
Dated: January 31, 2008 Attorneys for Defendants
845873 / 32546

Case 1 :07-cv—00809-JJF—LPS Document 16 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
. 1, Richard L. Horwitz, hereby certify that on January 31, 2008, the attached document
was electronically tiled with the Clerk ofthe Court using CM/EGF which will send notification
to the registered attorney(s) of record that the document has been tiled and is available for
viewing and downloading.
I further certify that on January 31, 2008, I have Electronically Mailed the document to
the following person(s):
Mary W. Bourke Ford F. Farabow
Kristen Healey Cramer Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett &
Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP Dunner, L.L.P.
1007 N. Orange Street 901 New York Avenue, N.W.
Wilmington, DE 19899 Washington, DC. 20001
mbourke@,cblh.com ford.farabowg@,tinnegan.co1n
kcramer@,chlh.com ‘
. Charlie E. Lipsey Henry J. Renk
. York M. Faulkner Colleen Tracy
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dennis Gregory
Dunner, L.L.P. Fitzoatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
[email protected] 30 Rockefeller Plaza
york.faulknerg@,fin11egan.com New York, NY 10112
hrenk@,fchs.co1n
[email protected]
clgregorygc11fchs.com
i /s/Richard L. Horwitz
. Richard L. Horwitz
y Kenneth L. Dorsney
1 Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP
Hercules Plaza —— Sixth Floor
A 1313 North Market Street
P1). Box 951
Wilmington, DE 19899-0951
(302) 984-6000
- rhorwitz@ gotterandersoncom
dmooregggpotteranderson.com
843476/ 32546

Case 1 :07-cv-00809-JJ F-LPS Document 16-2 Filed 01/31 /2008 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
- FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, )
ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED, )
IPR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., and )
SHIONOGI SEIYAKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA, )
E )
Plaintiffs, ) CA. No. 07-809-IJF
` )
v· )
)
APOTEX INC., and APOTEX CORP., )
. )
Defendants. )
ORDER
2 Having considered Defendant Apotex Corpfs Motion to Dismiss;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this day of , 2008 that the
Motion is GRANTED.
2 United States Distxict Judge
845873 /32546

Case 1:07-cv-00809-JJF-LPS

Document 16

Filed 01/31/2008

Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-00809-JJF-LPS

Document 16

Filed 01/31/2008

Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-00809-JJF-LPS

Document 16

Filed 01/31/2008

Page 3 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-00809-JJF-LPS

Document 16-2

Filed 01/31/2008

Page 1 of 1