Free Stipulation - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 60.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 466 Words, 3,164 Characters
Page Size: 622 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/39971/5.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of Delaware ( 60.4 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:08-cv—OO162-JJF Document 5 Filed O4/14/2008 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
PFIZER INC, PFIZER IRELAND )
PHARIVEACEUTICALS, WARNER- )
LAMBERT COMPANY, WARNEIL )
LAMBERT COMPANY, LLC and )
WARNEILLAMBERT EXPORT LTI). )
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
V- ) C. A. N0. 08-162—~JJF
RANBAXY LABORATORISE LIMITED, g
RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. )
and RANBAXY INC., )
Defendants. g
STIPULATEI) BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON RANBAXY’S MOTION TO DISMISS
PFIZ.ER’S COMPLAINT
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Ptizer Inc, Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals, Warnen
Lambert Company, Warner—La1r1bert Company, LLC and Warner-Lambert Export Ltd.
(collectively, “Piaintiffs") tiled their Complaint in this matter on March 24, 2008;
WHEREAS, Defendants Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Ranbaxy
Phannaceutioais, Inc. and Ranbaxy Inc. (collectively, "Det°endants") intend to tile a
Motion to Dismiss that Complaint, and have discussed that intention with Plaintiffs;
WHEREAS Defendants time to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint is extended
pursuant to the following briefing schedule;
IT IS HEREBY STIPUIATED by and between the parties, through their
attorneys, that the following briefing schedule be set for Dei’endar1ts’ Motion to Dismiss:
I. Defendants’ Opening Brief on their Motion to Dismiss shall be tiled on April
24, 2008;
2. Plaintit”t’s’ Opposition brief shall he tiled on May 19, 2008;
RL.Fi·32?2li46—l

Case 1:08-cv—OO162-JJF Document 5 Filed O4/14/2008 Page 2 of 2
3. Defendant? Reply brief shall be tiled on June 2, 2008;
4. Should an Answer to Plaintiffs’ Complaint be necessary, the parties will
mutually agree to a schedule for such Answer.
Plaintiffs reserve the right to seek discovery relating to the jurisdictional facts
supporting their Opposition brief Defendants reserve their right to oppose any such
jurisdictional discovery by Plaintiffs The parties recognize that, should (l) Plaintiffs
request jurisdictional discovery which Defendants oppose, thereby requiring a ruling by
the Court and (2) Plaintiffs are allowed any such jurisdictioital discovery by Court Order,
the abovestipulated briefing schedule will need to be revised to, inter alia, allow time tor
Plaintiffs to apply to the Court for discovery and/or to take the jurisdictional discovery
allowed, and the parties will work in cooperation to reach a mutually agreeable schedule.
/s/Mary W Bourke /s/F1’edar·iclcL. Cottrell, HI
RudolfE. I-Iutz (#484) Frederick L. Cottrell, Ill (#2555)
Jeffrey B. Bove (#998) [email protected]
Mary W. Bourke (#2356) Richards, Layton & Finger
Connolly Bove Lodge 8:. Hutz LLP One Rodney Square
The Nemours Building PO. Box 55l
1007 North Orange Street Wilmington, DE l9899
PO. Box 2207 (302) 65 l~7700
Wilmington, DE l9899—2207
(302) 658-9l4l
Attorneiufor the Ploinryjfs Attorneys for the Dejianczlcmts
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS day of 2008.
United States District Judge
2
ntridzizaaa-1

Case 1:08-cv-00162-JJF

Document 5

Filed 04/14/2008

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:08-cv-00162-JJF

Document 5

Filed 04/14/2008

Page 2 of 2