Free Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 39.7 kB
Pages: 2
Date: April 11, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 399 Words, 2,326 Characters
Page Size: 610 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/40081/11.pdf

Download Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware ( 39.7 kB)


Preview Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware
“ Case 1 :08-cr-00060-GIVIS Document 11 Filed 04/ 2 8 Page 1 ot 2
c O EY
REDACTED ·’ l
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
Plaintiff] g
v. g Criminal Action No. 08- Q O
MALIK A. SAMUELS, 3
Defendant. 3
INDICTMENT
The Grand Jury for the District of Delaware charges that:
COUNTI
On or about March 6, 2008, in the State and District of Delaware, Malik A. Samuels,
defendant herein, did knowingly possess in and affecting interstate commerce, a firearm, that is, a
Smith & Wesson .38 caliber revolver, Model Number 64-1, Serial Number D759789, after having
been convicted on or about September 25, 2006, of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term
exceeding one year, in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County,
in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 922(g)(l) & 924(a)(2).
NOTICE OF FORFEITURE
Upon conviction of the offense alleged in Count One of this Indictment, defendant Malik A.
Samuels, shall forfeit to the United States pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 92·4(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 246l(c),
all firearms and ammunition involved in the commission of the offense, including but not limited
to a Smith & Wesson .38 caliber revolver, Model Number 64-l, Serial Number D759789.
If any of the above—described forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission of the
defendant:
(a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;

‘ Case 1 :08-cr-00060-GIVIS Document 11 Filed 04/10/2008 Page 2 ot 2
(b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party;
(c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court;
(d) has been substantially diminished in value; or
(e) has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without difficulty;
it is the intent ofthe United States, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p) as incorporated by 28 U.S.C. §
246l(c), to seek forfeiture of any other property of said defendant up to the value ofthe forfeitable
property described above.
A TRUE BILL:
Foreperson
COLM F. CONNOLLY
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
By: f
Robert F. Kravetz
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Dated: April 10, 2008
2

Case 1:08-cr-00060-GMS

Document 11

Filed 04/10/2008

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:08-cr-00060-GMS

Document 11

Filed 04/10/2008

Page 2 of 2