Free Petition to Revoke Probation/Release - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

r . i :la.gEwM—- ·_ ,-M.:
F§§`fm]§)m • • ;`?ECE’”"E¤ ;
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR'Ii mm 1 gm
for I CLERK L. s ;;;g·,··H,;;r CSM,
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA IB`, ¤.¤ri2·3i~,·,»,
r l--;:..··..*—·....<;~;x——»———-—»__ DEPUTY
United States v. Alberto ELIZONDO Docket No. 00CR00962—001-Pl~lX—RCB
Petition to Revoke Supervised Release T
COMES NOW PROBATION OFFICER ASSISTANT Alicia R. Pineda presenting an official report
on Alberto ELIZONDO who was committed to the Bureau of Prisons November 13, 2000, by the
Honorable Robert C. Broomfield presiding in the District Court of Arizona. A 36-month period of
supervised release was imposed, and supervision commenced upon the offender‘s discharge from
imprisonment May 16, 2003. In addition to the general terms and conditions adopted by the court in
General Order 05-36, the offender was ordered to comply with the following special conditions:
1. lf deported, you shall not re-enter the United States without legal authorization and the express
written order/permission of this Court. .
I Alberto ELIZONDO was convicted of Illegal Re—entry After Deportation, a violation of 8 USC §1326(a)
& (b)(2), a Class C felony.
RESPECTFULLY PRESENTING PETITION FOR ACTION OF COURT FOR CAUSE
AS FOLLOWS:
Allegation A. Violation of Special Condition No. 1: lf deported, you shall not re-enter the United
States without legal authorization and the express written orderlpermission of this Court.
On or about September 22, 2005, Elizondo re-entered the United States without legal authorization. This
was evidenced by his arrest September 22, 2005, by the Department of Corrections in Madera,
California. This arrest was subsequent to his May 17, 2003 deportation. Grade C Violation,
§7B1.1(a)(3).
Allegation B. Violation of Standard Condition No. 1: You shall not commit another federal, state
or local crime during the term of supervision.
On or about September 22, 2005, Elizondo committed the new federal offense of Re-entry After
Deportation, a violation of 8 USC §1326(a) & (b)(2), a Class C felony. This was evidenced by his arrest
September 22, 2005, by the Department of Corrections in Madera, California. This arrest was
subsequent to his May 17, 2003 deportation. Grade B Violation, §7B1.1(a)(2).
Case 2:00-cr—OO962-DGC Document 16 Filed O4/18/2006 Page 1 of 2

Page 2
U.S.A. v. Alberto ELIZONDO • Q
Docket N0. 00CR00962-001-Pl—IX—RCB
April 3, 2006
AFFIDAVIT AND PETITION PRAYING THAT THE COURT WILL ORDER A WARRANT BE ISSUED
In conformance with the provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the
foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Based on the information presented that the
offender has violated conditions of supervision, I am petitioning the Court to issue a warrant.
(2Zcé’[i%;l;£ { Offérggoc
Alicia R. Pineda, Date
U.S. Probation Officer Assistant
Reviewed by
f Lori A. Wantland Date
Supervisory U.S. Probation Officer
R iewed by
y z i 7 6
i ssist t U.S. Attorney Dat;-fig ;
ORDER OF COURT
I find there is probable cause to believe the offender has violated conditions of supervision, supported
by the above affirmation given under penalty of perjury. The Court orders the issuance of a warrant.
Considered and ordered this gfday of , 20 ¤6 and ordered filed and
made a part of the records in the ove case.
_ /
The H orable Robert C. Broomfi d, .
Sr. U . District Judge
Defense Counsel:
James Metcalf
217 South Second Avenue
Yuma, Arizona 85365
Case 2:00-cr—00962-DGC Document 16 Filed O4/18/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:00-cr-00962-DGC

Document 16

Filed 04/18/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:00-cr-00962-DGC

Document 16

Filed 04/18/2006

Page 2 of 2