Free Stipulation - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 105.3 kB
Pages: 3
Date: February 12, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 534 Words, 3,342 Characters
Page Size: 612.48 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/7515/350.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of Delaware ( 105.3 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of Delaware
. Case 1 :04-cv-00163-GIVIS Document 350 Filed 02/12/2007 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
DONALD M. DURKIN CONTRACTING, INC. )
I
Plaintiff, )
I
v. ) No. 04-0163-GMS
`
CITY OF NEWARK, HAROLD F. GODWIN, )
_ JOHN H. FARRELL, IV, TERRY CLIFTON, ) ‘
KARL G. KALBACHER, DAVID J. ATHEY, )
FRANK J. OSBORNE, IR., and CHRISTINA )
REWA, )
I
Defendants/ I
Third Party Plaintiffs, )
vg )
I
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, )
1 I
I Third—Party Defendant. )
I
I
CITY OF NEWARK, I
I
Third-Party Plaintiff, )
` I
v. )
I
URS CORPORATION, )
I
Third-Party Defendant. I
{ |PROPOSED| STIPULATION FOR PARTIAL STAY OF BRIEFING
WHEREAS, on December 20, 2006, the Court entered a stipulated briefing schedule on
all post-trial motions;
WHEREAS, on January 26, 2007, the parties filed post-trial briefs on their respective
post-trial motions;

Case 1 :04-cv—00163-GIVIS Document 350 Filed 02/12/2007 Page 2 of 3
WHEREAS, plaintiffs post-trial motions may be substantially affected by the Court’s
rulings on defendants’ post-trial motions, and the parties desire to conserve the Court’s judicial
resources by deferring further briefing on plaintiffs post-trial motions until after the Court has
ruled on defendants’ post-trial motions; and
WHEREAS, deferring briefing on plaintiff s post-trial motions will allow the parties time
to meet and confer after the Court’s ruling on defenda.nts’ post-trial motions, and to simplify and
to narrow any remaining issues presented by plaintiff s post-trial motions.
lt is therefore stipulated by the parties, subject to approval by the Court, that briefing on
plaintiffs post-trial motions is stayed pending the Court’s rulings on defendants’ post-trial
motions. Following the Court’s ruling on defendants’ motions, the parties shall, within 10 days
of the Court’s ruling, meet and confer to consider the Court’s ruling and its impact on plaintiffs
l post-trial motions. Within 5 days thereafter, the parties shall submit for the Court’s approval a
briefing schedule to resolve any unresolved issues in plaintiffs post-trial motions.
POWELL, TRACHTMAN, LOGAN, CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP
CARRLE & LOMBARDO, P.C.
/s/ Collins J Seitz, Jr.
/s/ Paul Logan Collins J. Seitz, Jr. (Bar No. 223 7)
Paul Logan (Bar No. 3339) Max B. Walton (Bar No. 3876)
475 Allendale Road, Suite 200 1007 North Orange Street
King of Prussia, PA 19406 P.O. Box 2207
A (610) 354—9700 Wilmington, DE 19899
(302) 658—9141
TYBOUT REDFEARN & PELL
Attorneys for Dejendants, City of
Newark Harold R Godwin, John H
/s/ David G. Culley Farrell, IV] Jerry Clwon, Karl G.
David G. Culley (Bar No. 2141) Kalbacher, David J Athey, F rankJ
750 South Madison Street, Suite 400 Osborne, Jr., and Christina Rewa
Wilmington, DE 19899
(302) 658-6901
Attorneys for Plaintwf DATED: February 12, 2007
Donald M Durkin Contracting Inc. ‘
2

Case 1 :04-cv—00163-GIVIS Document 350 Filed 02/12/2007 Page 3 of 3
IT IS $0 ORDERED, this day of February, 2007.
Gregory M. Sleet, U.S.D.J.
3

Case 1:04-cv-00163-GMS

Document 350

Filed 02/12/2007

Page 1 of 3

Case 1:04-cv-00163-GMS

Document 350

Filed 02/12/2007

Page 2 of 3

Case 1:04-cv-00163-GMS

Document 350

Filed 02/12/2007

Page 3 of 3