Free Stipulation - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 104.7 kB
Pages: 3
Date: February 8, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 508 Words, 3,281 Characters
Page Size: 612.48 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/7515/348.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of Delaware ( 104.7 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :04-cv-00163-GIVIS Document 348 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
DONALD M. DURKIN CONTRACTING, INC. )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) No. 04-0163-GMS
)
CITY OF NEWARK, HAROLD F. GODWIN, )
JOHN H. FARRELL, IV, JERRY CLIFTON, )
KARL G. KALBACHER, DAVID J. ATHEY, ) I
FRANK J. OSBORNE, JR., and CHRISTINA )
REWA, )
Defendants/ _ )
I Third Party Plaintiffs, )
. v. ` )
)
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, )
)
Third-Party Defendant. )
J
)
CITY OF NEWARK, ‘ ) -
)
Third—Party Plaintiff )
)
v. ) . .
)
URS CORPORATION, )
)
Third—Party Defendant. )
‘ |PROPOSED| STIPULATION FOR PARTIAL STAY OF BRIEFING
WHEREAS, on December 20, 2006, the Court entered a stipulated briefing schedule on
all post—trial motions;
WHEREAS, on January 26, 2007, the parties tiled post-trial briefs on their respective
post-trial motions;

Case 1 :04-cv—00163-GIVIS Document 348 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 2 of 3
WHEREAS, plaintiffs post-trial motions may be substantially affected by the Cou1t’s
rulings on defendants’ post-trial motions, and the parties desire to conserve the Court’s judicial
resources by deferring further briefing on plaintiffs post-trial motions until after the Court has
ruled on defendants’ post-trial motions; and
WHEREAS, deferring brieting on plaintiff s post—trial motions will allow the parties time
to meet and confer after the Court’s ruling on defendants’ post-trial motions, and to simplify and
to narrow any remaining issues presented by plaintiffs post—trial motions.
It is therefore stipulated by the parties, subject to approval by the Court, that briefing on
T plaintiffs post—trial motions is stayed pending the Court’s rulings on defendants’ post-trial
i motions. Following the Court’s ruling on defendants’ motions, the parties shall meet and confer
to consider the Court’s ruling and its impact on plaintiffs post-trial motions. Counsel shall
thereafter propose a schedule to resolve any unresolved issues in plaintiffs post—trial motions.
POWELL, TRACHTMAN, LOGAN, CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP
CARRLE & LOMBARDO, P.C.
/s/ Collins J Seitz, Jr.
/s/ Paul Logan Collins J. Seitz, Jr. (Bar No. 2237)
Paul Logan (Bar No. 3339) Max B. Walton (Bar No. 3876)
475 Allendale Road, Suite 200 1007 North Orange Street
King of Prussia, PA 19406 P.O. Box 2207
(610) 354-9700 Wilmington, DE 19899
(302) 658-9141
TYBOUT REDFEARN & PELL
Attorneys for Dekndants, City of
Newar/q Harold F Godwin, John H
/s/ David G. Culley Farrell, [VQ Jerry Clyton, Karl G.
David G. Culley (Bar No. 2141) Kalhacher, David J Athey, Frankl
750 South Madison Street, Suite 400 Osborne, Jr., and Christina Rewa
Wilmington, DE 19899
(302) 658-6901 ‘
Attorneys for Plaintwf DATED: February 8, 2007
Donald M Durkin Contracting, Inc. ·
2

Case 1 :04-cv—00163-GIVIS Document 348 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 3 of 3
IT IS SO ORDERED, this day 0fFeb1·ua.ry, 2007.
Gregmy M. Slcet, U.S.D.J.
3

Case 1:04-cv-00163-GMS

Document 348

Filed 02/08/2007

Page 1 of 3

Case 1:04-cv-00163-GMS

Document 348

Filed 02/08/2007

Page 2 of 3

Case 1:04-cv-00163-GMS

Document 348

Filed 02/08/2007

Page 3 of 3