Free Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 .LAW OFFICES
RONAN & FIRESTONE, PLC T
2 9300 EAST RAINTREE DRIVE. SUITE l20 {
SFOTTSDALE. ARIZONA 85260
3 (480) 222-9100 E
mbf.asst@ronan·Hrestone.com j
4 Merrick B. Firestone, SB #012] 38 {
Veronica L. Manolio, SB #020230 ;
5 Attorneys for Defendant Makings .
6E;
7 l UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i
8 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
9 DIANE MANN, as Trustee for the Estate of No. CIV—O2—2099—PHX—RCB
10 LeapSource, Inc.; CHRISTINE V. KIRK, et al., _
. H Plaintiffs, MOTION TO EXCEED i
PAGE LIMIT ON REPLY
12 v. RE: SUMMARY JUDGMENT I
13 GTCR GOLDER RAUNER, L.L.C.; et al., A
I 4 Defendants.
I 5 MICHAEL MAKINGS,
1 6 Counterclaimant, p
17 v. I
18 LEAPSOURCE, INC., et al.,
19 Counterdefendants. K
QQ Defendant Michael Makings ("Makings") hereby respectfully requests that he be permitted I
2] to file his Reply regarding summary judgment in excess ofthe I I-page limit mandated by our federal ;
22 Local Rule of Procedure (L.R.Civ.) 7.2(e). Makings’ motion raised several issues which, as this I
23 Court knows, are complex. And, although Makings has limited his Reply to the issues raised in
24 response, the Reply still necessitates more than an I l—page rebuttal analysis.
25 Makings respectfully asks the Court to allow Makings’ Reply in its entirety and also avows
26 that this motion and the Reply are filed in good faith. If the Court is not inclined to allow this
Case 2:O2—cv—O2099-RCB Document 438 Filed O7/31/2006 Page 1 of 3

1 increased page length, Makings respectfully asks that he be given an additional twenty (20) days to
2 re-draft and re—submit this Reply to meet the presumptive page limitation. 1
3 A proposed from of order allowing the extended page limit is submitted herewith.
4 . .
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 31 S‘ day of July, 2006. / y
5 Wa
RO V ·»‘4* & FIRESTO VA4. , (i//f f) J
6 if A V / AA V { {//J if if/’x}
JK ji ' / (’ WRX ` L-
7 g isrl ’ -
Me ick B. Firesto 1· M" "r~=~ —
8 Veronica L. Manolio s d
9300 East Raintree Drive, Suite 120 p
9 Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
Attorneys for Defendant Ma/rings ;
10 l
11 ORIGINAL tiled electronically with the C1erk’s Office I
and COPIES electronically transmitted to the following 1
12 CM/ECP registrants this same date to:
131 Leo R. Beus
1 lbeusgidbetisgrilbeitt.com p
14} Scot C. Stirling
_ sstirlinggdjbeusgilbert.com
15 Kevin Breger J
kbreger{cv;beusg.ilbert.com r
16 Steven Eric Weinberger
sweinber·g·ei·gqu;beusgilbertcom f
17 Attorneys for Plaintws L
18 Steven J. Brown
[email protected] {
19 Attorneys for Plaintiff Diane Mann, as Trustee
20 David S. Foster
dav;id.tostei·@lxv.co1n
21 Nicholas B. Gorga [
nicholas.gorga(a`>lw.com
22 Michael J. Faris 1
l michae1.fa1·is¢’@1xr»*.cor11 i
23 Livia M. Kiser ;
livia.kiser{r£>1w.coin y
24 Kevin Russell p
kevin.russellgallwcom I
25 Attorneysfor Certain Defendants
26 / x x I
2
Case 2:O2—cv—O2099-RCB Document 438 Filed O7/31/2006 Page 2 of 3 e

l Don P. Martin ;
dniartingaJ.g;uarles.eoni J
2 Edward A. Salanga ;
esa1angaga)gua.rles.eom
3 Attorneys for Certain Defendants
4 John J. Bouma
jbeuina.(cDsw1aw.eoni
5 Joseph G. Adams P
·;`gadanis(@Dsiwlaw.com i
6 Todd Feltus Y
tfeltus a2swlaw.com ;
7 s Patricia Lee Reio A
refo cuswlawcoin
8 James R. Condo i
`[email protected]
9 Attorneys for Defendant Kirkland & Ellis
10 Foster Robberson
[email protected] .
1 1 Richard A. Halloran
rh alloran qOlrla.w.e-oin 3
12 Candida M. Ruesga
cruesga(£z)1rla\>t¤.coni. 3
13 Jon D. Weiss i
'weiss gDl·rlaw.com I
14 Attorneysfor Defendants Eaton and AEG .
is Y
~ gv gl?
16U COPY delivered this l. ” day ofJuly, 2006 to:
17% The Honorable Broomfield c
United States District Court .
18 230 North First Avenue .
Phoenix, AZ 85025
E 19 i
N E
20 By; MW i s
21 _
22 g
23 J
24 i
25 J
26 1
3 j
Case 2:O2—cv—O2099-RCB Document 438 Filed O7/31/2006 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02099-RCB

Document 438

Filed 07/31/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02099-RCB

Document 438

Filed 07/31/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02099-RCB

Document 438

Filed 07/31/2006

Page 3 of 3