Free Declaration - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 LAW OFFICE
STUART ]. REILLY, P.C.
2 PO Box 80410
Phoenix, Arizona 85060-0410
3 Telephone: 602/912-9200
4 E-mail: [email protected]
Stuart]. Reilly, #005275
5 Attorney for Plaintiff
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
10 _
Stuart J. Reilly, )
11 ) Case No. CIV O2-2218 PHX BTM
Plaintiff, )
12 ) DECLARATION OF STUART J.
vs. ) REILLY IN SUPPORT OF
13 ) PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO
14 Charles M. Brewer, Ltd. Profit Sharing Plan ) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
and Trust, a retirement plan, Charles M. ) ATTORNEY’S FEES
15 Brewer, Ltd. Restated Pension Plan, a )
retirement plan, and Charles M. Brewer, )
16 )
Defendants. )
17 )
18 )
19 Plaintiff, Stuart J. Reilly, submits his Declaration in support of Plaintiff Response to
20 Defendants’ Motion for Attorney’s fees pursuant to 29 U.S.C. ll32(g)(l) and Local Rule 54.2.
21
22
23
24
25
26
-1-
DECLARATION OF STUART J. REILLY - PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION PoR ATTORNEY’S PEEs
REILLY y. CMB, LTD. PROFIT SHARING PLAN AND TRUST, ET AL
Ca 2:O2—cv—O2218—BT|VI—LSP Document 316 Fnled O9/29/2006 Page 1 of 3

1 DECLARATION OF STUART J. REILLY
2
3 Stuait J. Reilly, under penalty of perjury declares are follows:
4 1. I am the Plaintiff in the cause of action entitled Reilbz v. Charlesll/L Brewer, Ltal
5 Pr0]7t Sharing Plan ana' Trust, et al., in the United States District Court, District of Arizona,
6 Case No. CIV O2-2218 BTM.
7 2. This suit was filed solely because I was advised by Thomas Shardlow and others
8 before him that I had a meritorious cause of action.
9 3. I did not file this suit nor maintain it for any ulterior reasons.
10 4. From my perspective I participated in settlement discussions in good faith based
11 upon the expert advice I had received. I reduced my opening settlement conference demand by
12 almost 65%, but the parties eventually reached a stalemate.
13 5. I never refused to respond to a call from Mr. Vanic during a recess in the trial. I
14 never received such a call.
15 6. It was not my purpose to force Defendants to incur extraordinary fees.
16 7. My involvement in this suit required a great amount of time and necessitated the
17 reduction of other professional business that otherwise would have been assumed.
18
” @/9;
20
21 Stuart J. Reilly
22
23
-2-
DEcLARAT1oN or stun; gUi;?1p]r2;r1QI]1;)p]ri;%ri)Eg)si$ §ESsI1;g;\1?C;r1g>L1;1;Ir/}iE1]gii~I;rJsSiTivi];>;§>LN ron ATTORNEY’S mas
Ca 2:02-cv-02218-BTIVI-LSP Document 316 Filed O9/29/2006 Page 2 of 3

1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2 I hereby certify that on September 29th, 2006, I electronically transmitted the attached
3 document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice
of Electronic Filing to be electronically mailed to:
4
Ed Hendricks, Esq.
5 Michael K. Dana, Esq.
MEYER HENDRICKS PLLC
6 3003 North Central Avenue, Suite 1200
Phoenix, AZ 85012
7
8 Michael Vanic, Esq.
C. Frederick Reish, Esq.
9 REISH LUFTMAN REICHER & COHEN
11755 Wilshire Blvd., 10th Floor
1Q Los Angeles, CA 90025-1539
11 Courtesy copy of the attached document mailed this 29th day of September 2006 to:
12 Hon. Barry Ted Moskowitz
13 United States District Court
5160 Courthouse
14 940 Front Street
San Diego, CA 92101
15
s/ Marisa J. Reilly
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-3-
DECLARATION or STUART J. REILLY - PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION Fon ATTORNEY’S FEEs
REILLY v. 0MB, LTD. PROFIT SHARING PLAN AND TRUsT, ET AL
Ca 2:02-cv-02218-BTIVI-LSP Document 316 Filed O9/29/2006 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02218-BTM-LSP

Document 316

Filed 09/29/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02218-BTM-LSP

Document 316

Filed 09/29/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02218-BTM-LSP

Document 316

Filed 09/29/2006

Page 3 of 3