Free Scheduling Order - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to the hearing held on September 6, 2005, and the Court being fully advised, IT IS ORDERED setting a jury trial in this matter for Tuesday, November 15, 2005, at 9:00 a.m. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting a pretrial conference in this matter for Monday, October 24, 2005, at 10:00 a.m. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting a final pretrial conference in this matter for Monday, November 7, 2005, at 10:00 a.m.
Case 2:02-cv-02245-EHC Document 109 Filed 09/12/2005 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) Intel Corporation, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) Intel Corporation, ) ) Counterclaimant, ) ) vs. ) ) Ammar Halloum and Sawsan Hamad, ) ) Counterdefendants. ) ) __________________________________)

Ammar Halloum,

No. CIV 02-2245-PHX-EHC ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a joint proposed pretrial order shall be lodged by October 17, 2005. The content of the proposed pretrial order shall include, but not be limited to, that prescribed in the Form of Pretrial Order attached. Statements made shall not be in the form of a question, but should be a concise statement of each party's contention as to each contested and uncontested issue. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in addition to filing a Proposed Pretrial Order, each party shall also submit stipulated jury instructions, proposed voir dire questions, proposed juror questionnaires, if any, and proposed forms of verdict by the same date the Proposed Pretrial Order is due. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any final pretrial disclosures required under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(3) are due 30 days before trial. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that motions in limine shall be filed no later than 30 days before trial. Only responses to motions in limine shall be filed; no replies are permitted. The hearing on motions in limine shall take place at the time of the final pretrial conference, or as otherwise ordered. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the parties agree to proceed to trial before a magistrate judge, they shall submit to this Court an executed "Consent to Exercise of Jurisdiction By a United States Magistrate Judge and Order of Reassignment." IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall keep the Court apprised of the possibility of settlement. If a settlement is reached, the parties shall file a Notice of Settlement with the Clerk of the Court and a Stipulation to Dismiss this action with a proposed form of order dismissing this case.

DATED this 6th day of September, 2005.

-2Case 2:02-cv-02245-EHC Document 109 Filed 09/12/2005 Page 2 of 2