Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

E I _,_;_,__ ILOOGED
1,____,___,F1E0E|VEQ _g___COPY
. . ox 6 ,
I {Wo"`? H?l%`%"£
2 I Tempe, AZ 85285 JUL 2 8 2005
Tel: 480-593-4444 .,, . , _ _ _.
A Fax; 602_268_6644 EEQIIISTFIICI count
° P'm“’f<¤f¤ Se I IT"."I 'i°TII.’?`.’I"$`I€=·"éI»‘=I»r~e··
5 ` IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
I I
8 Ammar Halloum NO. CIV-02-02245-PHX-EHC
9 I Plaintiff, PLAINTTFF/COUNTER
DEFENDAN'l"S MOTION FOR
10 Vs. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR POST-
H g TRIAL SUBMISSIONS
Intel Corporation, (Second Request)
12 Defendant.
13
. . C I
14 y {md Cmpcmmmj (Hon Judge Earl H arro I)
15 Counterclaitnant,
16 Vs.
U Ammar Hallourn and Sawsan Hamad
Counterdefendants.
18
19 A
20 I Plaintiff/Cotmterdefendant Ammar 1—Ialloum (“I-Ialloum°’ or "Plai111:iff’) hereby
I
21 moves for a brief extension of the current due date by which both parties are required to
I
22 l tile their Proposed Finding of Facts, Conclusion of Law, and other supporting papers from
23 I July 31, 2006 to August 7, 2006 or at least to August 4, 2006.
24 The first extension kindly granted by the Court has turned out to be insufficient
25 because Plaintiff under estimated the amount of work and the time it will take him to
26 I reasonably complete his post-trial submissions under his difficult circumstances that he
27 stated in his first request for extension.. Plaintiff is still out of countiy and he genuinely
28 needs this second extension, which is not requested to cause unnecessary delays or for any
Case 2:O2—cv—O2245-EHC Document 190 Filed O7/28/2006 Page 1 of2

1 I other improper purpose. Plaintiff has tried his best to meet the ctnrent deadline but it is
2 clear that he won’t succeed in his efforts.
3 Plaintiff has not been able to contact the opposing counsel. However, Plaintiff sees
4 I no reason why Defendant lntel would have any objection to this short extension when it
5 might equally benefit and won’t be prejudice in any manner.
I
6 For the foregoing reasons, and the reasons of the first request for extension
7 incorporated here by reference, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the current due date for
3 I the parties to file their respective post-trial papers be extended from July 3l, 2006 to
9 August 7, 2006, or to August 4, 2006, at least.
10 I RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 2,% day of July of 2006.
ll I
’ Ammar Halloum
13 I pisaann
14 I
15 Copy of the foregoing served to
I this ]__$ day of July, 2006
16 I
{7 I Michael D. Moberly
Andrea G. Lisenbee
18 Ryley Carlock & Applewhite
19 l One North Central Avenue, Suite 1200
I Phoenix, Arizona 85004
20 I Attorney for Defendant
21 .rQ;4,;(;`
22 I
23 I
24
I
25
26 I
27 I
28
Case 2:O2—cv—O2245-EHC Document 190 Filed O7/28/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:02-cv-02245-EHC

Document 190

Filed 07/28/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:02-cv-02245-EHC

Document 190

Filed 07/28/2006

Page 2 of 2