Free Statement - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

` In ___ FILED _— LODGED
1 Ammar Halloum ·—·- RECEWED —~·— COPY
P. O. Box 26662
2 Tempe, AZ sszss MAR 2 7 2007
E°" %%%‘%%%*‘%‘$‘$
x: - - CLER
3 Pilaintiff (pro se) #¤§TglgTD§g2|§l§gr§iJHT
4
5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA -
7 I
8 Ammar Halloum NO. CIV-02-02245-PHX—EHC
9 Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S STATEMENT OF
10 CONSULTATIONS
Vs. `
11
Intel Corporation,
12 Defendant.
13 P
14 Intel Corporation,
1 5 Counterclaimant,
16 Vs.
17 Ammar Halloum and Sawsan Hamad
Counterdefendants.
18
19 _ _
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Ammar Halloum hereby advises this Honorable Court
20
21 that Defendant Intel acted in bad faith to show that it did an effort to resolve the attorneys
22 fees in exchange for sto ing the Plaintiff from filin an appeal to this case, and dro in
PP S PP E
23 the existing appeal for the whistle blowing case.
24
The Statement of Consultation filed by Mr. Michael D. Moberl , Attome for
25 Y y
26 Defendant Intel Corporation is untrue and deceiving, which goes along with the continued
27 fabrication, lies, and deception that this Counsel represented in order to eam his living in
- 28 ,.-/“
Case 2:02-cv—O2245-EHCI Document 209 Filed O3/27/2007 Page 1 of3 lg W

1 protecting a company that remains above the law. n
2 V On February 5, 2007, Intel’s Counsel contacted the Plaintiff by telephone and
3 asked him if he would be open to settle the two cases by dropping some of the attorneys
5 fees, or possibly all of it ($5,000). Plaintiff advised the Cotmsel that he may settle for an
6 amount that would compensate him for his out of pocket costs in the two cases, which
7 included attorneys fees, and medical bills, and some for the pain and suffering. Counsel
Z advised that he didn’t think Defendant Intel would settle for that, but promised to consult
10 the Defendant and get back with Plaintiff.
11 On February 6, 2007, in good faith, Plaintiff faxed Defendant’s counsel a written p
12 proposal outlining his attorneys and court costs, medical bills and prescriptions, cost of
E court witnesses, the three months unpaid salary by Intel while keeping the Plaintiff out of
15 work, and the amount to compensate for some of the pain and suffering. Plaintiff sent this
16 proposal after he was mislead by Defendant’s Counsel that Intel was interested in a
ll "global settlement" not in settling the alleged attorneys fees. _
E On February 7, 2007, Plaintiff received an insulting and unrealistic proposal by
20 Defendant’s Counsel that Intel would waive few hundred dollars from the illegitimate
" 21 attomey fees that Defendant is pursuing.
22 On the same day, Plaintiff responded genuinely that as expected Intel was not
ij interested in settling the issue, and explained that Intel continues with unethical tactic
25 similar to taking Plaintiffs attorneys to side rooms, and having under the table deals
26 instead making clean presentations in- open court. Intel’s proposal was so ridicules and
27 sarcastic that carried a message that Intel was not interested in a good faith negotiation,
28 _
-2-
Case 2:O2—cv—O2245-EHC Document 209 Filed O3/27/2007 Page 2 of 3

._ '
1 but continuation of bad faith dealing.
2 The final paragraph submitted to the court by Intel’s counsel "the undersigned
3
4 advised the Court that despite good faith efforts, no resolution of the attorneys fee issue
5 has been reached." is very in accurate, and deceiving because Intel dealt in bad faith and
6 was attempting to settle the two cases in addition to the attorney’s fees for few hundred
7 dollars.
8
9
10
H RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this ZZ day of March, 2007.
12 BY
13 Plainti f mmar Halloum
i 14
1 15 Original submitted to
this LZ day of March, 2007
16 Honorable Judge Earl H. Carroll
17 And l
United States District Court
18
19 Copy of the foregoing mailed to
this gg day of March, 2007
20
21 Michael D. Moberly
One North Central Avenue, Suite 1200
22 Phoenix, AZ 85001-4414
Attorney for Defendant Intel Corporation
23 Q
24 I
25
26 I ‘
27
28
-3-
Case 2:O2—cv—O2245-EHC Document 209 Filed O3/27/2007 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02245-EHC

Document 209

Filed 03/27/2007

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02245-EHC

Document 209

Filed 03/27/2007

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02245-EHC

Document 209

Filed 03/27/2007

Page 3 of 3