Free Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 90.0 kB
Pages: 4
Date: July 31, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 696 Words, 4,121 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/24156/389.pdf

Download Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages - District Court of Arizona ( 90.0 kB)


Preview Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages - District Court of Arizona
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Gary L. Birnbaum (#004386) [email protected] Charles S. Price (#006197) [email protected] Timothy J. Thomason (#009869) [email protected] Scot L. Claus (#14999) [email protected] MARISCAL, WEEKS, MCINTYRE & FRIEDLANDER, P.A. 2901 North Central Avenue, Suite 200 Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2705 Phone: (602) 285-5000 Fax: (602) 285-5100 Attorneys for Defendant Snell & Wilmer, LLP IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA BILTMORE ASSOCIATES, as Trustee for the Visitalk Creditors' Trust, Plaintiff, CASE NO. CIV 02 2405 PHX HRH MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL PAGES REGARDING THE REPLY BRIEF (Assigned to the Honorable H. Russell Holland)

14 v. 15 PETER THIMMESCH, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
1

Defendant Snell & Wilmer, LLP ("Snell & Wilmer"), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby moves the Court for its Order allowing it to file a reply brief on the Motion for Summary Judgment not to exceed 20-pages. With the Court's permission, Snell & Wilmer filed a Motion for Summary Judgment that was approximately 35-pages. Plaintiff's Response was approximately 35-pages. The issues cannot be adequately dealt within an 11 page reply. Given the length of the Motion and the Response, Snell & Wilmer requests an order from the Court allowing it to file a reply not to exceed 20-pages.

U:\ATTORNEYS\TJT\Snell & Wilmer adv. Visitalk\Pleadings\Motion for Additional Pages Regarding the Reply Brief.doc

Case 2:02-cv-02405-HRH

Document 389

Filed 07/31/2007

Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

The reply brief will be due on August 6, 2007. As such, we request that the Court expedite its Order on this motion. Thank you. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 31st day of July, 2007. MARISCAL, WEEKS, McINTYRE & FRIEDLANDER, P.A.

By:

s/Timothy J. Thomason_ Gary L. Birnbaum Timothy J. Thomason Charles S. Price Scot L. Claus 2901 N. Central Avenue Suite 200 Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2705 Attorneys for Defendant Snell & Wilmer, LLP

U:\ATTORNEYS\TJT\Snell & Wilmer adv. Visitalk\Pleadings\Motion for Additional Pages Regarding the Reply Brief.doc

Case 2:02-cv-02405-HRH

Document 389

2

Filed 07/31/2007

Page 2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Biltmore Associates v. Peter Thimmesch, et al. (Case No. CV 02-2405-PHX-HRH) I hereby certify that on July 31, 2007, a copy of the foregoing will be sent via FedEx to: Judge H. Russel Holland UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 222 West 7th Avenue No. 54 Anchorage, AK 99513 907-677-6251 I hereby certify that on July 31, 2007, I electronically transmitted the attached document(s) to the Clerk's Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants: Christopher R. Kaup [email protected] Robert Royal r [email protected] Gregory W. Seibt [email protected] Tracy C. Morehouse [email protected] Tiffany & Bosco, P.A. Third Floor Camelback Esplanade II 2525 East Camelback Road Phoenix, Arizona 85016-4237 Special Counsel for the Plaintiff

I hereby certify that on July 31, 2007, I caused the attached document to be served by first class mail on the following, who are not registered participants of the CM/ECF System: Cynthia Thimmesch 5512 N 6th Street Phoenix, AZ 85012 Defendant Pro Se Peter Thimmesch 11329 Stonehouse Place Potomac Falls, Virginia 20165-5123 Defendant Pro Se Raymond F. Gaston Betty B. Gaston 5313 E. Pinchot Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85018-8039
3

U:\ATTORNEYS\TJT\Snell & Wilmer adv. Visitalk\Pleadings\Motion for Additional Pages Regarding the Reply Brief.doc

Case 2:02-cv-02405-HRH

Document 389

Filed 07/31/2007

Page 3 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Defendants Pro Se Mark J. Giunta 845 North Third Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1408 Defendant Pro Se

By: s/ Kelly Haverstock

U:\ATTORNEYS\TJT\Snell & Wilmer adv. Visitalk\Pleadings\Motion for Additional Pages Regarding the Reply Brief.doc

Case 2:02-cv-02405-HRH

Document 389

4

Filed 07/31/2007

Page 4 of 4