Free Consent of Defendant & Order of Referral - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

A in THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
· j FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA N
UNITED STATES ot AMERICA, y cap} ·* 6/5// ", ;@'>’A’···
J 1
Plaintiff, J CONSENT or DEFENDANT (J J
vs. ) AND ’
é]/ . S15? EZ,) __ _ ORDER OF REFERRAL . E M
/' ¢£/ J ( S5/Q 3 [PROBATION/SUPERVISED RELEASE
C ·) - VIOLATION)
Defendant. ) _ .
_ g
ORDER OF REFERRAL
Defendant ' ' having requested
/;E{ to enter admissi nie) (or) mean evidentiary hearing re:_revocation and having l
consented to go forward with that proceeding before a United States gistrate ·
Judge, the Court refers the matter to Magistrate Judge gjlgad I
to make findings as follows; _
I (A) whether defendant is (1} competent; (2} understands the violation
a.11egati.0n[s); and in the event: the defendant: chooses to enter an admissiong
h _ __ _(3) the- defendant knowingly and voluntarily wishes to make the admission(s] and
in I `(4`) there exists a factual basis forthe admissionis}- `
If the defendant chooses to admit the al1egation(sJ, fthe Magistrate Judge
is to make a recommendation as whether the admission should be accepted by the
` District Court.
j.-.
` U.S. D` ` u•ge ·
CONSENT or DEFENDANT
After full consultation with counsel, I voluntarily consent to go forward
T·“rrwitthrmyt%1¤.dm issitnrstlrcrrg rev identi·ary··1·i·eari:nv;re#revoc ati onrbeforerth€tUni·t edu "—?‘
States Magistrate Judge.
i I conse, the- ove referral: . l
Defe .
/»'
— Co or Defendant . Assistant U.S. Attorney
Dr°—`Yé Fi|€dl2/01/2005 Pagél ¤f1 E

Case 2:03-cr-00441-DCB-JJM

Document 40

Filed 12/01/2005

Page 1 of 1