Free Order on Motion to Continue Trial - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 IT IS ORDERED granting the parties joint motion to continue the 13 trial set for January 4, 2006. 14 The court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by 15 taking this action outweigh the best interest of the public and the 16 defendant in a speedy trial. 17 conclusion that the failure to grant such a continuance would deny 18 the attorneys for the Government and defendant the reasonable time 19 necessary for effective preparation taking into account the exercise 20 of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(1)(F);(8)(A) and (B)(i)(iv). 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating the January 4, 2006 trial, 22 resetting the matter for Tuesday, April 4, 2006 at 9:00 a.m., in 23 Phoenix, Arizona. 24 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED extending the time to file pretrial 25 motions to and including February 13, 2006. 26 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any subpoenas previously issued and 27 served in this matter remain in effect and are answerable at the new 28 This finding is based on the court's vs. Jeanette B. Wilcher, Defendant. United States of America, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CR 03-1098-01-PHX-EHC O R D E R IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 2:03-cr-01098-EHC

Document 177

Filed 12/29/2005

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

trial date and the party who served the subpoena should advise the witnesses of the new trial date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that excludable time is found to exist between December 24, 2005 and April 4, 2006 , pursuant to the provisions of 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(1)(F);h)(8)(A) and (h)(8)(B)(i)(iv) for a total of 102 days.

DATED this 28th day of December 2005.

Case 2:03-cr-01098-EHC

-2Document 177 Filed 12/29/2005

Page 2 of 2